Only people with 130+ IQs can answer this

Only people with 130+ IQs can answer this.

b as in bait

...

it clearly says that event b happened hours later

A, look at the comma

100% of germans can't solve this

If it was a period or a semi-colon it would be A then B

If it was someone speaking then the comma could just be pause, thus B then A

I'm going with B then A

Event B. The comma changes nothing and the alphabet designations are arbitrary. If event A happened first it would have said "hours LATER event B happened."

>only people who watch rick and morty can answer this question

The Jews did it.

commas in german, dont make any, sense, can, confirm

Not enough information.

Open to interpretation.

B8

To be fair, you have to have a very high IQ to understand Rick and Morty. The humour is extremely subtle, and without a solid grasp of theoretical physics most of the jokes will go over a typical viewer’s head. There’s also Rick’s nihilistic outlook, which is deftly woven into his characterisation- his personal philosophy draws heavily from Narodnaya Volya literature, for instance. The fans understand this stuff; they have the intellectual capacity to truly appreciate the depths of these jokes, to realise that they’re not just funny- they say something deep about LIFE. As a consequence people who dislike Rick & Morty truly ARE idiots- of course they wouldn’t appreciate, for instance, the humour in Rick’s existential catchphrase “Wubba Lubba Dub Dub,” which itself is a cryptic reference to Turgenev’s Russian epic Fathers and Sons. I’m smirking right now just imagining one of those addlepated simpletons scratching their heads in confusion as Dan Harmon’s genius wit unfolds itself on their television screens. What fools.. how I pity them.

And yes, by the way, i DO have a Rick & Morty tattoo. And no, you cannot see it. It’s for the ladies’ eyes only- and even then they have to demonstrate that they’re within 5 IQ points of my own (preferably lower) beforehand. Nothin personnel kid

Its bad grammar. Either the comma is uneccesary or its a sentance fragment which should read "Thats when event a happened, hours after event b..."

B. I have a 157 intelligence quotient, but I don’t think that you need a >130+ IQ< to solve this. Nonetheless, I don’t think the ability to complete the riddle is dependent from IQ, but rather a sense of grammar.

A since A comes before B.

>bad grammar and poor punctuation make language difficult to understand

Nigga you have gay boy syndrome

...

C

The punctuation is incorrect as it's written; there are two ways this sentence can be interpreted.

"Event A happened hours after Event B happened." (B -> A)

or

"Event A happened; hours after, Event B happened." (A -> B)

Either way, asking a question with syntactical ambiguity doesn't make you clever. Either answer could be considered correct based on interpretation.

The Egyptian air force on Saturday gunned down several militants and destroyed their vehicles, hours after over 230 worshipers were killed in a terrorist attack at a mosque in the country's restive North Sinai region.

but why bb

>could go either way
>b makes more sense
>bait, fo sho.

I'd assume B, since the sentence does use commas. A comma shows intent of treating the second part (after the comma) as a complete section of the sentence, and additional commas would be needed to clarify any alternative to that. Adding a second comma following "after" would have made it clear that it was A. So if they meant A, they are fucking retarded. If they meant B, they could have worded the sentence more clearly.

Event B, otherwise the comma is redundant.

you're retarded

Very poor use of English.
Event a happened hours after event b happened
Event a happened, hours after, event b happened

Using only one comma makes it nonsense.