What are your thoughts on this man?

What are your thoughts on this man?

Just a reminder: Ideas don't kill people, people kill people

Other urls found in this thread:

socialdemocracy21stcentury.blogspot.com/p/the-labour-theory-of-value-as-presented.html
twitter.com/AnonBabble

hegelian pleb

Too obvious. You are either new at this or female.

He look like Santee Claus lol

some pseudo intellectual NEET that wrote some books on things he never did in his life.

He was living thought cancer. One of the biggest pieces of shit to ever walk the earth.

Solid critique of capitalism and its potential strengths and weaknesses, but his solution to capitalism is equally garbage.

redpilled af and made a brilliant critique of capitalism. however his proposed alternative was retarded.

flawed ideas can kill people

Marxian economics have been debunked since Marginalism was developed in the 1870s. Real economists studied the economic mechanisms that that didn't understand such as money or wages. Eventually they were able to put together models that relaticely accurately described those mechanisms. What Marx did instead was assume that the more abstract parts of economics are actually just oppression to steal resources. Everything that wasn't literally direct exchange of resources is seemingly oppression in his world. In reality abstrsct things like money, capital investment, wage labor, market driven prices, stocks, etc. all came to be naturally. The market over time optimizes itself and these oppressive tools of capitalism are really just symptoms of highly advanced exchange.

Psychopath retard who leeched off of his friends and projected his shitty behavior onto his ideal society which is basically a massive welfare system justified by lack of rationality and scapegoating successful people

>Ideas don't kill people, people kill people
Sure ideas dont have a direct causal relationship with death of a physical person just as the lion's idea of eating you as a meal doesn't cause you to get your neck bitten off

However, it can very well be argued that he is morally responsible, not causally responsibility for the deaths of millions of people.

He brings me presents every year.

>Thanks Santan Chrustmas

Truly red pilled

>Be Marx
>Expend part of your life trying to refute Stirner
>End up just with Ad hominems
>Shit your pants,and only publish the refutal after Stirner is death,because he knows that Stirner would BTFO and make him look like a fool
Kek. Marx was a coward that was scared of the real deal

>Ideas don't kill people, people kill people
Atomic bombs don't kill people, people kill people

The subjective theory of value,just makes Marx critique obsolete.
On top of that half of his philosophy was based on arbitrary terminology.

Pretty good sociological theorist and his analytical work was quite accurate. Shame about the communism shit.

I don't know why he assumes his personal preference in politics should be the end all of the dialectical process. Even worse I don't understand why he took a metaphysical idea and tried to tie into economics and government.

Ideas control people.
People kill people.
Ideas kill people.

Which is why I should be allowed to own a nuke.
>shall not be infringed

what do you think about the labor theory of value. i have a socialist friend that tried telling me that the subjective theory of value was more about stuff on a micro scale but the labor theory of value is on the macro scale, as in they're both correct but cover different things.

One of the greatest monsters in history.

Inventor of worlds greatest weight loss program

Looks strikingly similar to Fredrick Douglass

Marx was well-intentioned but like all those who believe that humanity can reach a utopia he failed to foresee the blowback that his ideas precipitated

Muh 6 million

entitled fucking retard

/thread

>Inventor of worlds greatest weight loss program

You attached the wrong image...

Here I fixed it for you

Highly intelligent yet very naive.

without him fascism and nazism wouldn't have even existed.

Seems like he just copied Hegel's ideas

>Hegel's State is the final culmination of the embodiment of freedom or right (rechte) in the Elements of the Philosophy of Right. The State subsumes family and civil society and fulfills them. All three together are called "ethical life" (Sittlichkeit). The State involves three "moments". In a Hegelian State, citizens both know their place and choose their place. They both know their obligations, and choose to fulfill their obligations. Individuals' "highest duty is to be members of the state."(Philosphy of Right section 258.) The individual has "substantial freedom in the state". The State is "objective spirit" so "it is only through being a member of the state that the individual himself has objectivity, truth, and ethical life."(Section 258) Every member, furthermore, both loves the state with genuine patriotism but has transcended mere "team spirit" by reflectively endorsing their citizenship. Members of a Hegelian State are happy even to sacrifice their lives for the state.

K-E-K
I'm afraid that you're being exploited by your idiot friend. He's relying on your ignorance to push asinine ideas.The LTV is complete and utter bullshit.
socialdemocracy21stcentury.blogspot.com/p/the-labour-theory-of-value-as-presented.html
For a more thorough refutation I would read Eugen von Böhm-Bawerk's Karl Marx and the Close of His System.

marx is to historical materialism as darwin is to evolution

he offered some incredible insights on the capitalist system, some of his big-picture stuff is still spot-on like centralization vs. concentration of capital

sadly he couldn't think out of the box and spouted one of the dumbest most harmful ideas of all time

the way to communism clearly goes through the increasing development and dissemination of robots, not a proletariat revolution

Without a proletariat revolution the robot owners would continue to horde wealth

No,the labour theory of value assumes that the added value of labour has some real value in itself,but this is just false,as an object in itself doesnt have any real value,and labour just changes the object,it doesnt make it more valuable.

let's pitch that to someone

That is assuming that there won't be robots to buy,and that they will be monopolyzed. Which is dumb as hell. The price of automation has been going down with time. Assuming that sooner or later people coukdn't buy robots with little capital needed is just dumb.

>What are your thoughts on this man?
As a man of the working class, I am tired of a bunch of upper middle class PUSSIES attempting to speak on my behalf when I never asked, much less wanted, them to do so.

I don't know whether or not Marx started this trend but he certainly popularized it and we're still seeing it drag on today what with college liberals, social justice, we are the 99% and so on

Why the capitalists not horde something that has the ability to destroy their power and status?

You're only rich if other people are not

That is bullshit. How many people did Bill Gates exploted to make his wealth? Your theory is totally obsolete. You can create wealth out of no where currently,Marx just wasnt intelligent enough to predict this.

A neet shitposter who took himself 100% seriously.

Keked