Who else here is for Veto Johnson?
Gary Johnson
Other urls found in this thread:
weeklystandard.com
twitter.com
T-tr-trannies are h-hot, right?
Fucking OP is always a gigantic faggot.
who?
I too listened to Joe Rogan experience and am now a #GaryMissle
>goldberg
op is a faggot
You're right OP, I'm a #HardJohnsonForJohnson now
I'll vote for Johnson, but I don't agree with him on many issues.
Still represents my politics more than the three clowns we have this cycle from the major parties.
>GOLDBERG
Are they even trying ?
>T-tr-trannies are h-hot, right?
I don't even know.
>Goldberg
>Goldberg
Austin petersen is a much better candidate. There was a debate at the convention 4 hours ago. Delegates are running away from johnson very fast right now.
We'll know sunday when they vote. But it's looking like a few ballots before the winner is offical.
...
Yup, I'm a #GaryFairy.
>Will Sup Forums ever not be right
No, even as a lolbertarian I hate that faggot.
>Goldberg
Every time
The point.
lower.
lower.
lower.
lower.
(You)
faggot.
Johnson wants open borders, he might as well be Chiam Goldstein Shekelberg III, esq.
>goldberg
why Johnson when Romney can actually win ?
weeklystandard.com
are you feeling the johnson
if no one gets 270, the top 3 electoral vote gaining people get sent to the house to be voted on. With the house being mostly R.
All a libertarian would technically have to do is get a couple states and deny the others 270. The house would be too split to elect HRC or trump, so would settle for libertarian.
That sounds like bullshit.
Why would they be split? The Republicans would vote Trump, Democrats Clinton and Trump would win.
You're telling me you think a party with zero representatives in Congress would have its presidential candidate win in such a scenario?
...
I think Amash, sasse, and others would push for Libertarian party. While democrats who are willing to give up most of their principals would vote (L) to make sure they don't get a trump.
Huh, that's strange... This can't be right...
It is bullshit. They would vote in Paul Ryan for President.
>Austin petersen is a much better candidate.
Austin Peterson is a moron. Peterson has actually argued the following for his terrorism policy:
Peterson takes the ancap position with respect to borders. He does not believe in borders at all.
Therefore, any attack on any people, anywhere in the world, is an attack on our "brothers and sisters."
Therefore, the US is entitled to respond aggressively against the attacker, where ever they may be in the world, regardless of who they attacked.
But, he says, he would only use mercenaries, not the US military.
It was unclear in his essay if he would use tax dollars to hire those mercenaries but, if he does, it seems like all he would accomplish is deploying less well equipped people to fight.
Nope the house votes by majority of states not by majority of reps so any republican will win because they have the majority of states
Ryan will come third before any libertarian due to faithless electors
>red states are where the electors vote for their candidate, while grey states electors can vote however they like
>>red states are where the electors vote for their candidate, while grey states electors can vote however they like
What do you mean? I thought all of the states can vote however they like if it goes to the House of Representatives.
Are you talking about the electoral college, with some states having their electors bound and others not?
Yes taliking about electors not congressmen
Gary Johnson is an open borders shill. Fuck him.