> I'm only pretending to be retarded meme
Thanks for contributing to the thread and the discussion at hand. You sure showed me off my wrongs.
Literally no one was able to supply proper proof. All called me a retard for disagreeing and I'm not even religious.
No it doesn't. Are you really that naive? Can you not look at evidence and come up with a conclusion? This is the most basic of problem solving. Its ridiculous the amount of Mental gymnastics people will jump through to try and prove a point. Its Ok to admit you're wrong sometimes.
>start an evolution thread
>it's not just racist bait
>mfw actual productive discussion with a little shitposting thrown in
I like Sup Forums now.
Every day they find new evidence, dissproving the previous. 'Evidence' is nothing more than a momentary 'proof' that people use to contradict another 'evidence'. It's not even worth discussing really.
> 'T-rex and other dinosaurs may have had lips, new study shows
> 7 hours ago
early hour Sup Forums is always like this
the retards go to sleep
My argument was that there is no subtle difference shown. Just 5 skulls that look very different from one another. People claimed that the 5 skulls 'clearly' show a transition, even though they're very different and even broken at some points.
Still no proof of the transition is shown. People have gone to name calling and banter instead of providing proof to defend their claims.
> Read: 'Evolution THEORY'
It's here to be proven wrong by a better theory and you know it.
>I can't use a fucking dictionary
Evidence, pulled directly from yout fucking God, Google:
the available body of facts or information indicating whether a belief or proposition is true or valid.
>absence of evidence is not evidence of absence
Which is why we use axioms and observations to narrow down what is and isn't true. Just because everything is possible does not mean that everything is probable, and declaring that an entire system and all the evidence pertaining to that system is wrong in place of another system is going to need both evidence for itself and against its competitor being true.
>that would prove your theory
What we've already shown is a condensed version of that. You can't honestly expect anyone to compile hundreds of skulls and place them in order, show picture evidence of every change (I don't know how the fuck you're going to show 2mm more sloping of a skull on a camera) and then fit all of this on a graphic ready to post so that people would read it, when you can show the culmination of the changes and achieve literally the exact same result in an easy to digest format. You're acting like a child.
>I want to see small changes
They take thousands of years. Thousands. Thousands of fucking years of evolution is what you want to see? Do you think fossils drop out of the freaking sky?
More like "built upon" actually. Alchemy was proven to be bullshit, but it served as the basis for modern chemistry.
For some nothing will be enough proof.
Look at this guy. Willing to accept evolution happening before his eyes but in denial that is can happen over millions of years.
Have some more examples of species that appear not to have evolved from there ancestral forms.
en.wikipedia.org
>All called me a retard for disagreeing
I did no such thing.
>'Evidence' is nothing more than a momentary 'proof' that people use to contradict another 'evidence'.
Baby'sFirstScienceLesson.jpg
And Europe wakes up.
>It's here to be proven wrong by a better theory and you know it.
Evolution 2.0 stronger and now retard resistant.
What do you expect it to be replaced by?
>actual productive discussion with a little shitposting thrown in
I don't think we're browsing the same thread.