Is Sup Forums too fucking dumb to solve this ?

is Sup Forums too fucking dumb to solve this ?

186, I guess, but it could be literally anything.

Could be anything?

69 ;-)

66, the numbers increase by three when you look at them upside down.

66

It's 186.

Woah. You guys are legit retarded its kinda sad

Thanks

No. Take your lateral thinking and stick it up your literal ass.

126

spot the autistic faggot

Already found you.

easiest thing ever, came to say this exact same thing

ok kevin

It's 99. Just flil the image. Done

its 66 actually

30+6=36
60+36=96
120+96=216

216

You stupid fucknugget, your punctuation is upside down too now which makes the whole thing be completely nonsensical and useless. Your backwards thinking is something you can have fun at on reddit so pls fuck off, and while your at it consider suicide.

That said, it's 186, just like other anons pointed out before.

Roll

The answer to this question is 99. Or 66 if you want to turn it upside down to match the direction other numbers.

216

Now the 3 became an E, doesn't work.

666!!!

126

99 durr

71 you fuckin fools.

216

27

Yeah I thought about that, but then I realised it'd turn the 3 the wrong way. OP I'm sorry to say this and I feel like I shouldn't be the one to tell you, but you're retarded.

Sup Forums is too dumb to wipe their ass to be honest.

what do I win?

156 actually

Glycerine.

>This WOULD be kind of clever if his 3 wasn't fucking backwards.

66, you faggots, it's upside down. Miss me with this seventh grade shit.

You faggots do realise these complete-the-sequence questions have no guaranteed answer, right? The next number doesn't have to be based on an obvious rule. Only brainlets think there's no uncertainty.

186

186

there are more than 1 answer so stick your retarded shit up your ass

66

Good example user

It would only be clear if there was a 2 at the begin

Actually, it still wouldn't be clear. No matter how many numbers you list it's possible to, in theory, contrive some convoluted sequence that defies intuition. I know that's more malicious than any "brainteaser" would reasonably be, but it's an important aspect of inductive reasoning.