>Your name should go like "Name [Political Party] ## tripcode" for easy identification.
>1 namefag = 1 MP >Join an existing political party or create your own
To create a party: >choose name & color (I need a hex code not some random color or you will get the gayest shade of said color I can find color-hex.com) >appoint a party leader >party must have at least 3 avowed members to be officially recognized >making a wiki page or pastebin of your party platform is highly encouraged but not required
Proceedings: >Once we have ~15 MPs we can begin to form party coalitions to determine the ruling government of parliament >We will use the thread to vote (if I suspect jewery we will hold a second vote)
IF YOU ARE THE LEADER OF A PARTY, DIRECT NEW MPs TO REPLY TO THIS POST TO BE REGISTERED!
CHANGE OF PARTY ALSO REPLY TO THIS POST
Caleb Mitchell
Reporting.
Thomas Evans
>tfw no 1 member parties on the op anymore nice and crisp looking op
Adam Perry
In. Not as in reporting you to mods.
Jordan Wright
(OP) # FOUNDING THE ARGUMENT PARTY
ONLY ARGUMENTS ALLOWED!
#FFE975
JOIN NOW! WE WILL ABOLISH NON-ARGUMENTS BY POINTING THEM OUT!
Carter Clark
I understood.
Damn shame about the HRE being broken up. I'd like to see you as a NatSoc one day.
Christian James
Who are the other two members that wish to join your argument party?
Jeremiah Murphy
DEUS VULT
Nathaniel Reed
green text the happenings after I left last night
Jayden Foster
I was one of the independents last time so just change one grey to the hex code I provided which is a quite argumentative yellow I must admit.
Kayden Smith
Lurking here, posting from phone at a coffee shop because I just got back from a lecture.
Carson Cooper
Starting the Government Men party. This is a party for special agents, from the real world government, to gather and control Sup Forums from the inside. Colour is #FFFF69
Lucas Lopez
We need a President of Parliament, like the US president.
John James
Until you get 3 people in the Argument Party, you aren't a party and thusly will not be represented separately on the poliament diagram.
I'll add your name and trip to the list of registered MPs. Once There are two other MPs that wish the join the Argument Party your party will be shown on the graphic.
Thomas Perez
For any newcomers, here's a little info on the GALACTIC EMPIRE party.
We are a /tg/ based party that seeks to unite all the boards of Sup Forums under a single banner in order to present a STRONG, UNITED FRONT against the other shitty websites.
We promote the CREATION OF ORIGINAL CONTENT, the ABOLITION OF FILTHY SUBHUMANS and STRONG, CENTRAL LEADERSHIP.
Are you sick of the pointless bickering and weak leadership that has plagued Sup Forums? Are you tired of having to repeat the same shit over and over again because no actual progress is being made? Do you really like dank STAR WARS memes?
Then join the Galactic Empire today, and cast your vote for a STRONG Sup Forums.
Our Parliament is a mess. It needs orderly, representative, efficient and standardized procedures. Therefore, the Unity Party introduces a five-point plan which may be drafted as legislation:
1. To be considered, legislation must have the backing of at least three MPs. 2. To be passed, considered legislation must receive votes of assent from the majority of the Parliament. 3. Votes must be processed and tallied through virtual third-party polling platforms, which forbid users from voting more than once. 4. The legitimacy of a tally is called into question after a fifth of the Parliament expresses doubt. 5. Once the legitimacy of a vote is called into question, the legislation is suspended and voted upon in the thread until a majority of MPs pass it.
Every legislation that the UPP makes seeks to benefit them, and thus can't be passed.
Thomas Jenkins
>3. Votes must be processed and tallied through virtual third-party polling platforms, which forbid users from voting more than once. gay. all votes should be in the thread.
Easton Campbell
This is good stuff, but it may be too soon, as we don't have a framework for how or when voting sessions are even held yet.
Eli Hall
That also works. Then it looks like I make two.
Julian Miller
This desu
Daniel Bell
3. Disagree- Votes in Thread are fine as they have 3 forms of identification, Thread specific ID, flag (Vague form of ID), and Tripcode. Where as non-thread voting has a million ways of being hacked. 4. Not needed if you vote in the thread the first time 5. Not needed if you vote in the thread the first time.
Connor Sanchez
>2. To be passed, considered legislation must receive votes of assent from the majority of the Parliament. This will never happen. We won't even get half of parliament in our quorum.
Cooper Mitchell
Whoops forgot trip
Adam Robinson
Actually, seeing the arguments against, I'll retract this.
Joseph Nelson
this desu
anyone who wants to use a third party site is a cuck who wants to vote rig. I can rig all votes on voting sites and if you attempt to push voting to them then I will do just that.
Voting in thread is literally the purest form of voting and the least likely to be abused.
Samuel Rodriguez
Not an argument. Jk We got three people already! ARGUMENTS! Please put the Argument Party in the graphic!
Noah Moore
No you don't.
Zachary Bell
We need to develop a framework, urgently. These threads are becoming cancerous.
Voting in thread is inefficient, and prevents legitimate majorities. It's a problem that needs to be resolved. There are plenty of secure polling sites which can be used.
A link to a poll lasts forever, while threads only last an hour. We need external platforms, if we hope to achieve consistent and representative results on legislation.
Landon Barnes
Not An Argument.
1+1+1=3
Isaac Allen
>There are plenty of secure polling sites which can be used. List them.
Julian Moore
That's doubleplusungood think. Big brother says 2+2 is five, and likewise I say 1+1+1 is two.
David Gray
Oh shit nigga, would you mind changing my name to "Stefan", that was a typo.
Jack Clark
NOT
Jaxon Sanchez
fixed, and your party has been added to the graphic. Next thread you'll see it
Lucas Reyes
desu all of your laws make it harder for people to participate and only make the parliament more complicated and bureaucratic and benefit you. You are only a speck of sand compared to other parties. Voting in thread is easier to keep track of and more efficient.
However, we do need a framework. I'm working on one now.
Well, first, we need to figure out what the duties of a speaker are, and how many sessions we want per day.
From where I'm standing, a speaker would need to:
>OP parliament on the day of the voting session. >Put bills up from the legislative docket for voting. >Count votes and announce the results.
That all seems pretty straightforward, yes?
Eli Peterson
Both of those have been used is past parliaments and both have been abused. All I need to do is turn my phone on airplane mode and off and I'll have a new IP. Enjoy my multiple votes.
William Morgan
Releasing Registry to the public
>National Socialist Party of Sup Forums Members: (17) #b71513 Götz von Berlichingen [NatSoc][Party Leader] !!ENJKyU61aqU Richard Wagner [NatSoc] !uoRBQ2R7lQ Nigel [NatSoc] !!FBt7IKHg7MG Namefag.mp3 [NatSoc] !!Em9OPjqCM8T Aeneas [Natsoc] !RpAAIH5t6w Percy Fitzpatrick [NatSoc] !!fNNgYDcr9yg Shadow Reichsminister of Forestry Alexander [Nat Soc] !!bZv95O7fSFV gondola [Nat Soc] !!1PliTUSZqRm Cecil John Zuma [NatSoc] !Jpbgjc.2q2 Reich Warfel [National Socialist Party] !c.owXYv3w2 Unbekannt rumänisch Soldat [NatSoc] !Ab9tqSi59Q Ulysses !!X0knJf55xKh Huetler[NatSoc] !7NyaRfkuKU Sarma [Nat Soc] !kRYbPKmydE Shillkrieg [Nat Soc] !!E/iO50MnHEf Kaiser [NatSoc] !mrPIY/ReVE Fidelio [NatSoc] !Y5Xin5TjhE Spurdo Spärde [NatSoc][Pact of Steel] !IcIsZbenis
>Templars: (11) #b84f38 Grand Master Godfrey !!g1aA4GzLUYd Crusaderkun !!SuwteC25JH9 Malleus Maleficarum !nmPf4V1esE Crusader Gibson !.BxecfigoM Bruce Norman lnkYxlAbaw MuksiSaksalainen !.NcPWosamA Texasfag !n4q0Sm62oI bigot[Templar] !ZgH1O2XoqY Srpski [Templars] !!bVhx9gTXcI4 Remy-Alexander Les Paul [Templar][Pact of Steel] !RjIFoLVWK2 Eddie Kessler [Templar Order] [Pact of steel] !!SUISs9WrlG9
>Trumpic Imperial Party:(7) #4682b4 May [Trumpic Imperial Party] !!GjqLpOpGXpf Tiberius [Trumpic Imperial Party] !TRUMPWA8VE Designated Shitposting OP [Trumpic Imperial Party] !Poojeet.mA Bill Nye The Science Goy [Trumpic Imperial] !2quM74gD1E Rabbi shlomo shekelstein [Trumpic Imperial party] !!L6zziHG8/KZ William Howard Taft [Trumpic Imperial Party] !!AxXnzOQlUE+ Pursuit of burger [TIP](Pact of Steel) !87RlhPRNuY
>Burger Libertarians: (3) #FFFF00 Johannes Cuckburg [Burger Libertarians] !!Lvr82lz2fbx Papa Cheese [Burger Libertarians] !!J9DP9yXhYoO fedora [Burger Libertarians] !!OYY3dR3+5wQ
>Crypto-Anarchists: (6) #48a385 SHA-512 [Crypto-Anarchists][Party Leader] !QSDSS70XPQ Chain [Crypto-Anarchists] !KfKCJ9/OO2 ... Elliot ... [Crypto-Anarchists] !ecXmUF7x32 Adam Kokehed [Crypto-Anarchists] !lF9FswyVNs J[Crypto-Anarchists] !!O+Si7CNDV/W Big Willy Billy [Crypto-Anarchists] !ePUl/AW9M2
>[Argument Party] (3): #FFE975 Stefan Molyneux [Argument Party] !9EOvfGw1Jw Not an [Argument Party] !!S/vN1z7ECsA Ronnie Donnie [Argument Party] !5NMkdyhrjU
Connor Lee
>to benefit you
The Pact of Steel is the alliance whose been pushing through legislation without legitimate majorities, to be frank. Of course you're against this legislation. Utilizing modern, third-party, polling platforms would actually lessen bureaucracy and confusion while allowing representative results.
We could have a simple database of links that would allow MPs to vote on legislation at their convenience, and see clear results instantly. But of course, that doesn't benefit you, does it?
Xavier Adams
--- Start of Independents --- (19) Srpski [Independent] !!bVhx9gTXcI4 Aloha Snackbar [independent] !!w9E7Jh4xfth Kai Leng [Independent] !!3hzCaOW9ehu Franz von Habsburg [Independent] !!PrghP8qThuu
Carl [Cucks United] !!p6baA0WWtFD
>Cerberus:(1) #728087 James Sterben [Cerberus] !!B2/NClKb6fn
>Degsech: (1) #86f0a1 Fritz Haber[Degsech] !!3+7+5qESjy
--- End of Independents ---
Caleb Martin
Pretty much. President should act as gamemaster and create storylines for the parliament/council to deal with. Mindlessly voting on things is dumb without there being any real happenings.
Or have a serious GM of the whole parliament whose sole job is to come up with storylines. He can watch things from the background and nudge out issues that the players have to react to.
Doing good. Some fag tried to destroy parliament earlier. Everything was going to be erased.
Thomas Torres
>>Cerberus:(1) #728087 >James Sterben [Cerberus] !!B2/NClKb6fn >>Socialist Front: (1) #e68a00 >Trotsky [Socialist Front] !!H1mG6NpxhnN >>Priesthood of Kek: (1) #066010 >Kek High Priest [Priesthood of Kek] !!nK7HpAlbtUB
Does this mean we can identify as part of a party even if it doesn't technically exist as an official party?
Jace Mitchell
Yes. You just aren't considered a party until you have 3 members, but you can wear the tag.
Isaac Butler
Nice trips. This idea is pretty autistic
Jace Bennett
Was it >a leaf?
Zachary Edwards
The problem with a single dedicated GM is that said person will likely burn out, or might end up being a That GM that nobody likes. Having the position elected means that the person with the best storylines or the freshest ideas is more likely to get the job.
Plus. Politics ;^)
I completely agree on the president thing though. Perhaps two speakers for player-created legislation voting and a special HAPPENINGS session where the President acts as speaker and puts forward their issues for discussion and vote?
James Lee
Nice.
Elijah Phillips
Well ultimately it means that unless you have 3 members you won't be represented on the poliament graphic.
I kept the information back from when 1 man parties were allowed so that the registry would match the name that they post with.
I suppose a tag could be used as advertising for your party until you get the right amount of members.
Colton Lopez
>I suppose a tag could be used as advertising for your party until you get the right amount of members.
Well I figured that would be something I could use it for.
Sebastian Kelly
>Any majority that I disagree with is illegitimate >Making the voting process more complicated is less bureaucratic >implying modern is always better >implying you can't rig strawpoll with proxies >implying tripcodes and thread IDs aren't secure UPP is in full jew mode today. Hide and ignore, folks.
Robert Morris
what color code did you want for HRE? Just so I have it in case you get two more members
William Murphy
joining cucks united btw.
Can't take this parliament to take it seriously as a galactic empire MP.
2 speakers could work. Players can create their own happenings too. Let's say a player-party is having a dispute with another party and the other party started screwing with their boarders, they can go to the council and ask for aid. It could make storytelling between parties a hell of a lot better if they use it as such.
Ryan Jackson
Hey guys, Stefan Molyneux here, hope you're doing well.
freedomainradio.com/donate You know it's the right thing.
JOIN NOW JOIN NOW
Elijah Morris
REEEEEEEE BAN ALL PARTIES I DONT LIKE
Brayden Stewart
>This idea is pretty autistic im good at being autistic thats my job desu
Chase Foster
#dddb08
Justin Barnes
>ironic shilling
Ethan Gutierrez
Okay. Which parties do you want to ban?
Aiden Long
I will not be participating in this parliament. You can go ahead and remove my name.
Michael Perry
Hmm, so say the GM session has one GM-created issue that is voted on first, then two player-created issues that the GM chooses from the ones the players have come up with that week to be voted on too?
Then, of course, there's the two standard sessions for the usual backstabbing and fun ;^)
So, that'd divide sessions into:
HABBENINGS and JOLLY LEGISLATION
Lincoln Sanders
Her boobs are as big as her head
Zachary Watson
Thank you for telling me. Really appreciate it
Jacob Bailey
>ONE
Jaxson Harris
I'd say let player-created happenings happen as they happen. They have to put them onto the docket anyway so they will need to have it looked into. Could promote more than shitposting in threads between votes and sessions.
Mason Johnson
You are welcome.
Anthony Lopez
You do realize Miranda is Australian, right cunt?
Get that union jack shit out of here.
Hmm, true, true. I can imagine some of them though
"LOLS THE LEADER OF THE PARTY I DON'T LIKE IS A SAMEFAG BAN HIM BAN HIM HARD"
Nathaniel Mitchell
Well I hate anarchists and Libertarians, so banning the Crypto-Anarchists and Burger Libs is a great first step.
Hunter Martin
but desu we should just have a very, very basic ruleset and introduce it to the quest board. Then once things get going it can get expanded on via voting. I'm sure the players there will try to do storyline related things without being prompted to by those in charge. Remember, the /tg/ one had players building up a map and things were going on throughout. This wasn't prompted by the OP and happened naturally.
Luke Kelly
I was Dinner btw remove that name please :3
Jordan Miller
>95 members Okay so we have 95 registered MPs.
What percentage of that should we consider big enough to "count" How many total votes should be necessary before we consider it to be enough?
Roll call is on Sunday, so inactive or one-post-wonder MPs will be pruned
Jack Cruz
okay thanks
Charles Robinson
Hm. That sounds like much less effort on my part. We can save the super autistic rules-heavy version for /tg/, they'll gobble that shit up anyway.
Zachary Peterson
I was Ben Shapiro, get that out too. I have ascended!
