Red pill me on Climate Change

Red pill me on Climate Change.

Is it man made?

Other urls found in this thread:

youtube.com/watch?v=WDWEjSDYfxc
express.co.uk/news/science/674557/Has-climate-change-been-disproved-Large-Hadron-boffins-cast-shock-DOUBT-on-global-warming
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hillary_Clinton
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/AGM-114_Hellfire
youtube.com/watch?v=C6PNc9KN50M
twitter.com/SFWRedditGifs

Yes, its true, everyone agrees except the GOP since they are sponsored by the oil industry who would obviously bee obliterated the day everone switched to non-fossil, I knew this at age 11

Spoon feed me on this rock lobster

Nope, even the founder of green peace left his own organization because of the bullshit surrounding it.
youtube.com/watch?v=WDWEjSDYfxc
Also plenty of evidence was tampered with during the UN meeting and plenty of climatologists are backing out if they supported it.

Too lazy to link all the shit, just watch Patrick Moore's stuff.

((((They)))) are destroying our planet

Nuke the third world and go green.

Cows count for 18% of green house gas emissions (more than automobiles), are you suggesting we should genocide the cows to
save the environment? think of the food shortages and the lack of hamburgers,

seriously fuck eurocucks and enviroment fags
if you think you can actually solve climate change you're delusional.

ITS THE COEWS!!!

>american education

do you realize how aboslutely fucking disgustlingly stupid you make yourself sound?

>any research that conflicts with the global warming narrative is oil Nazis
>but government funded studies are perfectly unbiased

Legitimately curious. If cows make up nearly a fifth of all carbon output, more than cars, where does it all come from?

Does the remaining 60-70% come from evil corporations?

Nah it comes from

CHYNA

are you defending climate change or denying it?

pick one

climate change occurs naturally but we as a civilization admittedly contribute an amount to this. however, this amount is completely negligible, and heavy industry contributes by far the largest amount. the recycling industry is incredibly profitable which is why it's shilled so much by the media, when you recycle to ease your conscience you are helping a select few people get very rich, which is ironic and hilarious considering most environmentalists are also socialists. your contribution to the "reduction" of "global warming" is a token gesture, every single person on the planet going out of their way to recycle and use electric cars will have a laughably small effect on the climate. then if we break it down even further, nothing the west does matters because asia pumps the vast majority of human-made pollutants into the atmosphere, and this will be added to by africa when it finally reaches 19th century levels of industry.

as opposed to the pro-climate-change camp, which is supported by the globalist agenda led by a cabal that is far more powerful than the oil industry could ever hope to be. don't be as naive as the rest of your countrymen.

heavy industry, mostly from you and china. even a small, efficient chemical plant outputs thousands of tonnes of CO2 annually. this is fuck all, but compared to what the average person produces it's a lot.

Of course it is.
Actions do have consequences, no matter what the actual shills or the retards who parrot them might say.

Climate change is real and it will effect us in our lifetime, but I see no reason to hinder our economy (USA) for something that we can easily adjust to in the future. Not even to mention that countries like China are not going to do jack about climate change. Humans are good at adapting to new situations. When people hear that ocean levels will rise 50 feet in the next 100 years, they imagine in their head that a huge wave is coming but in reality it going to rise a half of every year which we can just move out of.

.--. --- ... ... .. -... .-.. -.-- -... ..- - - .... . . .- .-. - .... -.. --- . ... --. --- - .... .-. --- ..- --. .... -. .- - ..- .-. .- .-.. -.-. -.-- -.-. .-.. . ...

jet fuel cant melt steel beams and trees cant melt suns so yeah its fake

There are accounts during Roman times of northern Africa being a verdant paradise, covered in grass and forest.

Did all of the Roman factories, cars, and airplanes turn it into desert, or is it possible that the climate just naturally changes?

Who cares? It is literally the least important thing ever.

See that smog coming out of your car and all the buildings in your city? Imagine that happening 24/7 all over the world and think about what its doing to the environment. Like its literally common sense that we are polluting the shit out of our planet, which causes global temperature due to changing levels of gasses in the atmosphere.

First I was Trump supporter now I am a #HillfireMissile

Enviro Scientist here.

We contribute heavily to climate change, but the rate of change is much slower than our ability to adapt technologically so its not a problem.

The only places that will have issues are 3rd world shitholes that can't even feed themselves as it is.

Its an issue taken over by the left to push their globalist ideological agenda. Common sense environmental policy is all thats needed to avoid major disasters like chemical spills and heavy smog.

what's a hill fire missile

le weed man would be proud of you

express.co.uk/news/science/674557/Has-climate-change-been-disproved-Large-Hadron-boffins-cast-shock-DOUBT-on-global-warming

First it was global cooling, then it was global warming, now its climate change, you dont have to be a genius here...

Hillary Clinton:
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hillary_Clinton

AGM-144 Hellfire Missile:
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/AGM-114_Hellfire

If we replace the "Hell" in "Hellfire" with "Hill" (the first syllable from Hillary Clinton's name), we end up with: "Hillfire missile". The # helps to add social media cred, showing the world that you're "with it".

Afghanistan's Heroin this year is off the charts better than ever before

why keep it illegal anyway?

after listening to Dr. Carl Heart it seems like it aint nuthin but, a thang.

I always wonder. Even if global warming is man made. Wouldn't that still be natural in a sense? I mean sure we should take steps to prevent it but in the end we are humans, which is a type of animal and our lives have a byproduct. Beavers bring down trees and cause flooding when building homes but we consider that natural. We too are just animals, more advanced but still animals. Surely cities and pollution is in a way a result of us and our activities as animals. Ants and moles scar fields and pathways with their digging. Isn't that the same as us just on a smaller scale?

I don't know. Maybe I'm just tired.

No

oh ok

Totally not real. Climatologist are insane and don't know what they're talking about.

>-Paid for my Exxon Mobil

>Isn't that the same as us just on a smaller scale?
In this case it's like comparing a gash across the chest to a scraped knee.

Nah bro you are thinking to much FBI.

Partially. Anyone who says humanity has either no part or a negligible part in this is either deluded or a shill.

Its a jewish marxist conspiracy to exterminate white race.

>heavy industry
>america

that's a good one m8, most of the industry in the world is done in china now, everything else is but a grain of sand in comparison

Yes of course. However compared to moles that's exactly what we are. I'm not arguing amounts as numbers I mean more... Isn't this a byproduct of our specie's' behaviour. If dogs had biplanes and heavy industry would we be saying "fucking canines polluting the earth" or would we just accept it as something that they naturally do. Therefore isn't what we do just part of human nature? Even splitting the atom. Its just the same as a dog learning to count. Just on a different scale I guess. I'm not trying to say that what we do is nothing and shouldn't be curbed. I'm just saying that maybe its in a sense "natural" and then it would be in our interests of self preservation that we change. Therefore that too is "natural".

First they called it global warming, now climate change, what will be the next name for their hoax?

as not everything falls apart constantly that makes it obvious that a great deal of manufacturing is still done in the west

do not confuse emissions with global warming, our contribution to global warming/cooling is hardly worth mentioning

Yeah the adjustment is taken as given but we can minimise the costs of doing so

>I see no reason to hinder our economy
>countries like China
That sort of reasoning is why these climate agreements are so fucking difficult to negotiate. With a bit less free riding we could get this shit done in no time

Im agaisnt climate change, but to be fair, they did salt carthage.

I agree with have Global Change from the perspective that Earth goes through cycles and there is nothing we can do about it.

I am sick and tired of democrats using climate change as a means of making money. I hate that Conservatives are called out on their bs well Democrats are just better at hiding it.

because conservatives are better people.

We are accelerating it, it's arguable by how much. Even if the amount is negligible, it's not too bad because it fuels research into more efficient engines/generators as well as cleaner air, which obviously benefits everyone.

As much as it seems convincing that man made technological advancement has caused a rapid increase in greenhouse gasses, the far left trying to push things like carbon credits and carbon tax just makes me feel like it could be complete and utter bullshit. If it is in fact perpetrated by man, then why use a political agenda to try and punish citizens rather than huge companies in places like china that pollute the fuck out of the planet. That's the fallacy with it all, if it really mattered they would be going after industry in other countries that are polluting, not citizens that barely cause much of anything in comparison.

We also fight illnesses and diseases that come about naturally. Just because something is natural doesn't make it good. We should judge it based on its effects in relation to us and our environment.

>benefits everyone

Okay there, Porzingis. It only benefits the government whos trying to snuff out the free market.

Because you can't punish developing nations for burning coal :^)

Memes aside, electricity is probably the most important thing in well being of people. You can't blame literal shitholes filled with dumb niggers of not being smart enough to develop their own liberal meme energy or superior atomic energy. Countries like Australia could stop supplying China with coal, but that's not gonna happen either, they need to shitpost in our atmosphere as well, even if it's by proxy.

Its real but the silver lining is that its already too late

youtube.com/watch?v=C6PNc9KN50M

Ideally we would directly charge polluters for the pollution they cause. Done right, this could completely eliminate the excess pollution caused by the industry.

The issue is that there is no mechanism with which we can impose these charges on other nations and their companies without climate agreements.

It all boils down to a public good problem with free riding.

>believing in lies
>2016

I know but what I'm saying (I think) is that surely everything is in a way natural. Be it good or bad.
We learn to beat diseases because we want to lengthen our lives.
That's preservation of oneself. If a monkey learnt to take steps to lengthen its lifespan we would call that natural behaviour. It wants to live etc. So maybe all the stuff that we call unnatural is in a way natural. I can't seem to put what I mean into words. Sorry.

>fresh air is a government ploy to snuff out free market

You really should limit your intake of redpills, they're making you retarded.

If climate change isn't real how come the seasons and weather have been so fucked in the last years with unusually cold summers and hot winters? How do you explain the melting glaciers and rising temps all over the world?

might be man made (although climate has NEVER been static).

The real question is
>how do we solve it?

Pro tip
>solar and wind aren't the answer.

We should move quickly to lab-grown beef and yes, kill off livestock or use them for controlled grazing. Additionally, the extra hormones they're fed increase greenhouse gas emissions, so stopping that might put a big dent in it.

Either way, you're right that cattle farming is a huge part of man-made climate change, deforestation, and pollution in general. It's not an environmentally sustainable diet right now.

>The Year of our Lord MMXVI
>caring

m8 we've been in a record breaking El Nino for almost two years which has caused freak weather across the globe.

I can't fucking believe I keep having to point this out.

It's been El Nino for the past 30 years apparently

Also, you think you keep having to point it out because it's not a real explanation for climate change. Nobody else is repeating it because it makes you sound retarded.

>weather is that simple

I'm so sorry, did you go to a school in a ghetto?

Climate change is happening, we are increasing the rate it occurs. that is my opinion based on what i have read.

It's not an opinion, man. You're allowed to call a spade a spade, you know.

>they need to shitpost in our atmosphere as well, even if it's by proxy.

you're alright latvia, i like you

Climate change varies naturally, but can also be influenced by human activities.

There is evidence for both natural variation and human-driven effects, the two are not mutually exclusive.

The claim that it's one or the other is a false dilemma.

Why don't you just admit it?
It is not like we can do anything about it anyway.

Without fossil fuels for our industrialized agriculture, billions will die.