Why don't porn studios use CGI effects?

Why don't porn studios use CGI effects?

You got amateur fans making shit this good in their spare time.

After effects costs $30 a month.

Corridor Digital are making visual effects 10x better than network television on youtube.

Freddie Wong *literally eats a sandwich* in his video giving a detailed tutorial on how to add a convincing Mission Impossible un-masking effects to a video. Effects that blew the world away 20 years ago -- He eats a sandwich while explaining them.

Think about the things porn studios could do with even a modest budget efficiently applied to porn movies.

(not to say the budgets are directly comparable, but think about how much "District 9" did with a $30 million budget nearly a decade ago, compared to what Avengers did with their $220 million budget five years ago.

Why don't porn studios use any visual effects?

Other urls found in this thread:

youtube.com/watch?v=eBgaMSEY_0Y

twitter.com/SFWRedditGifs

>(not to say the budgets are directly comparable, but think about how much "District 9" did with a $30 million budget nearly a decade ago, compared to what Avengers did with their $220 million budget five years ago.

I phrased that wrong because I'm drunk and I can already tell some ass is gonna pick up on it. I'm not comparing porn budgets to movie budgets. Just saying with relatively little money you can make CG go a long way if you're smart about application.

That shit only looks good on drawn characters. In real life that looks creepy as all fuck, holy shit.

this is my new fetish

probably because it looks fucking stupid

A) It's obviously not your thing.

B) Imagine your thing. Now imagine it has visual effects to make it better.

Maybe the most famous porn gif on the entire internet blackwidowhulk.gif, is like 90% visual effects. A cock and balls with a green mask effect that are swollen up with a warp tool = hulk dick.

Kewl!

hell yea CGI anime porn

... why are you idiots using my *literally a guy in a basement example* of what visual effects can look like to explain why professional porn studios with 4k cameras, dozens of crew and tens of thousands in budget could do?

Do you have like down syndrome or soemthing?

You just said "They don't use visual effects because visual effects look fucking stupid."

Meanwhile.... in the world of visual effects...
youtube.com/watch?v=eBgaMSEY_0Y

This looks retarded, it's distracting and a little discomforting. Why would anyone want this?

Sauce?

>shit this good
What the fuck are you talking about this looks like literal garbage lol.

Oh my jesus, this is so frustrating.

THIS IS NOT AN EXACT EXAMPLE. THIS IS JUST A DEMONSTRATION OF HOW VERY BASIC EFFECTS *COULD* BE APPLIED. THERE ARE MANY APPLICATIONS. THERE ARE AS MANY APPLICATIONS IN PORN AS THERE ARE IN ALL OF THE FUCKING MOVIES THAT YOU LOVE.

What the fuck is wrong with this site's community... does everyone here have a mental illness?

that's some uncanny valley shit.

tiny niche at most. not profitable for big pornmakers, which is why you see amateur fetishists making edits in their spare time instead.

Okay I'm done. I understand now why porn studios don't do this. Because consumers are stupid.

/end thread.

Op is out, you have sufficiently and accurately answered the question. The answer is: "We're all too stupid to understand how visual effects work or how they can be applied." Great job, guys, no sarcasm, you have answered the question.

I think its hot. I like the idea of succubi hypnotizing and forcing me to get off in their mouths. Shit sounds cash as all fuck to be honest, m8

Theyre just baiting you. Itd be cheap to inpliment and i bet the first studio to do so would make a killing as long as they didnt get too nichey.

>post more if you got em plz

"good" effects like your Dr. Strange example are extremely expensive and time consuming, and the point of porn isn't to create big budget CGI movies that takes months or years to film, it's to make videos of people fucking each other.

They actually tried to make "big budget" porn a few years back with stuff like Pirates which cost them a million dollars to make, but it just wasn't nearly as profitable or fast as putting hot young sluts in gonzo and rolling for a couple hours.

>literally nobody likes my weird ass fetish
>is it me who's out of touch? no, it's the consumers who are stupid!

get the fuck out of here you fucking retard, lol.

yea calm down sperg. you still haven't answered the very simple and basic question of "why?"

literally why would a porn producer bother spending a significant amount of time and resources on adding a (quality) CGI budget? porn is for jerking off, not for trying to create art. are you sitting there masturbating with your monocle chain and sipping tea thinking you're highbrow for watching creepy edited eyeballs or something?

>HEY WHY DONT THEY DO THIS IN PORN?
>do what?
>POSTS VIDEOS OF SHITTY HYPNO EYE EDITS
>because that's stupid
>NO I MEAN YOU KNOW VAGUE SHIT LIKE WHY DON'T THEY DO THIS?
>literally what are you talking about
>I DON'T HAVE EXAMPLES BUT YOU'RE STUPID FOR NOT READING MY MIND I'M LEAVING

You are literally autistic my dude.

except for the part were you say he's literally autistic I'm in support of this.

not that anyone cares..

>Corridor Digital are making visual effects 10x better than network television on youtube.
lolno

literally what lol. jesus dude you are a man child.

Bro any more of those vids? There hot asf

Loving this shit. where can i get more

But what about a $30 million budget porno?

I clicked on that shit and almost came out my fucking chair. Fuck you and your swirly eyed whoress.

goddamn i actually love this shit plz post more

Fuck off then. Nobody likes CGI porn

Sources?

>consumers are stupid.
Keep telling yourself that

because it's fucking stupid. Now maybe if they used to airbrush the fucking sores and acne off their asses...

>does everyone here have a mental illness?

i'm pretty sure we do.

You don't understand, people enjoy porn because of how are it is. The action of two or more people enjoying each other. When you add cgi into it, it covers up the rawness. There might be a market for your taste, but pretty sure there isn't enough of you to encourage the studios

I blame Disney for all the shitty fetish shit in the west.

Also furry.

imo the hypno-eyes thing is a little strange, but you're taking one example of how the concept OP proposed could be implemented to be the entirety of what could be possible.

pretty sure you're mixed up on the meaning of uncanny valley

only reasonable counterargument to OPs proposition in this thread. i imagine the Dr. Strange example was simply to demonstrate the quality of what can be done professionally - in application, using CGI in porn would be done much more subtly.

ironic, considering your post paints you as the most pretentious one here

honestly can't tell if serious

Id stick you up with there with my response for the narrow-minded "hypno-eyes are fucking weird, and CGI = hypno-eyes" people, but you seem to a bit more imaginative and you've touched on a very important point...

Why should porn studios use CGI and/or after effects?
1. It can up the quality of their production in any number of more subtle ways (e.g. "airbrushing the fucking sores and acne of their asses" or amending things like camera shake or bad lighting)
2. It's not expensive as long as you're not doing shit like creating entire worlds from scratch

Bump for the sauce

word up keep dumping faggot

More of those!

In the future, jim cameron will shoot porn
Because we'll be hooked to it neomatrix style
Holdables then wearables then implantables
Cloud A.I. thinking through our minds
Unplug now while you can

Why unplug? I think that'd be lonely and boring....

Nice dubs.
Is that Jillian Jansen?
While I think the whole idea of CGI is fine, and I like the WEBMs posted, the trouble is, not too many people actually look at the girls' EYES when watching porn.

Try watching the following and tell me what you think.........

p o r n h u b .com/view_video.php?viewkey=ph5a1c39699713f

photoshop

FUCKEN GOT EM

Moar please