Super Heroes don't exi-

Super Heroes don't exi-

I am so glad what he did. Reddit Cucks can suck his dick. Protest all you want net neutrality is gone.

>HURR DURR LIBRUL TEARS

This affects you too retard

bump for death of net neutrality.

That's where you are wrong

...

giving telecom corporations power to own the libs

>spam elon musk with requests to build a new internet

FPBP

I literally can't find a single thing I lost because net neutrality is gone. I think most Liberals can't even name anything that is actually bad they just join in choir of crying as if it will bring it back.

Its not gone yet. It needs Congress approval or shit. Idk.

Give it time. It hasn't been repealed yet. Look at what Portugal has to deal with because of their lack of net neutrality.

Also do some actual research instead of asking a bunch of morons on Sup Forums

So I have to vote for the liberals now? All conservatives hate freedom if the internet?

Fuck, alright user, I'll vote lib next time.

Dammit.

It's fucking retarded that this would ever be a partisan issue. It should be the telecom execs against the rest of us united. But that's the fucking political climate we live in these days I guess. As an actual liberal I welcome you and your vote, but it shouldn't be this way.

...

Ajit Pai isn't that bad. I mean come on, you have to give him credit.

Liberals are saying it'll promote censorship on the internet, which I have a hard time believing since liberals hate free speech more than anyone.

to own everyone, gloats about taking up the ass from comcast

lol americucks gettin cucked

>liberals hate free speech more than anyone
We really don't, m8. The illiberal left is a small but loud minority who the rest of us are getting pretty sick of tbh.

must suck working sundays.
how many more posts until you're off?

Portuguese here.
We have net neutrality you retard, what is allowed in Europe is called Zero Rating.
Meaning that adding to our mobile data packets we have apps that don't consume data, like spotify and facebook and shit.
I have one of those for my phone, it's pretty cash actually.

Net neutrality means equal acess to all internet content, so it makes sense that limited data on mobile (home internet is usually unlimited cap) has some perks too, like some apps that don't use up your data cap.

...

You have a cuck fetish, so you have to call everyone else a cuck to feel better about yourself. Such a sad sad life... Don't worry user, there's many other republican cucks out there too.

This makes a lot more sense tbh. I'm not the user you replied to but I see no problem here.

...

Yeah I know, I have no issue with the Zero Rating system, it's pretty convenient I can still use a few apps even if I run out of mobile data.
Of course I've seen a few nerds call it "unfair" because it's "against the market" but that is utter bullshit, the apps that are free are so because they are good enough and used by enough people to "earn" that spot.

I would be pissed off if I had no net neutrality though, so pretty glad that's only an american issue yet.

Yeah Portugal is a small enough country that the means by which those programs are decided is probably pretty democratic just by virtue of looking at who's using what. America is huge and the populations of different areas are vastly different. It wouldn't work the same here.

For?

you managed to mispell "sole"

The whole point of Net Neutrality was that it was in defense of Netflix being throttled by Comcast. It was already happening in 2015. It was a preemptive strike against more of the same from ISPs. This is wishful thinking to say it wouldn't happen now. You say the internet was neutral the entire time and it didn't need a regulation? Be glad you had the luxury of not experiencing what would've happened if we did nothing in 2015. Now ISPs will feel emboldened to do more since so many on the right are now signing off on this because Trump tells them to.

Ajit Pai said himself that he thinks social media is the biggest threat to freedom of expression on the internet. But here's the thing.Twitter, Facebook, Discord, Instagram etc are still corporations and not gov't owned. The internet still doesn't exist within the laws of the US. They can still ban or censor whoever they want at the discretion of their CEOs. They still own all of the content you post on there. They are not subject the 1st amendment. His plan to combat conservative censorship does nothing to stop it.

But here's what it tacitly allows for; the control of information. You say something nasty about Trump? Your site can get throttled. You expose a huge corruption scandal at Comcast? Your site can get throttled. You conclude a massive decades long lab study that could save lives but threatens the profits of big pharma? Your site can get throttled. You discover a new form of alternative fuel that makes gas completely obsolete and threatens the profits of energy companies? Your site can get throttled. You make too much profit on a crypto currency and threaten the US Dollar? Your site can get throttled.

When you give the keys to corporations. They are going to look out for corporations...like they always do....not you. I laughed when Ajit Pai says Corporations will use the extra money to invest in infrastructure in developing area? ORLY? When have they done this before? That's a joke. It's bonuses. They always go to bonuses! Mr Papa John claims he has no money to cover the health insurance of his employees, yet he has enough to build a man made pond around his house.


You think there is going to be a package for Independent Media? Crypto Mining? Pirating movies? And yes I doubt there will be a package for all the weird porn you're all into either. You'll be enjoying that Japanese tentacle porn at 56K speeds from now on.

Unless you tow the corporate line and stay off their turf, your voice will be effectively silenced online. The internet has the potential to greatly resemble how Cable TV looks now....and might cost as much. The era where it was a wild west of innovation and freedom will be over.

As usual motherfuckers are too dumb to even protect their own self-interests: thank God democracy doesn't represent us all fully, or these country-fried retards would've voted away their rights long ago for an extra serving of honey-basted ham scraps and mandatory American flags at all KFC drive-thru windows.
>hurrfucking durrr net newtrality was preventing a free market from flourishing
Nah, it was a limp-wristed effort to keep your ISPs from choking out your data. And they couldn't even stomach that little of a leash.

These people would be hooking you up to a never-ending hamsterwheel of intrusive survey ads and packaged bit-by-bit microtransaction chores if they could. The Ted Cruzes and Ajit Pais of the world don't want data to be treated equally, they want it fully monetized. Give Gov't-Sponsored technology to private providers on a no-bid contract. Give telecom industries carte blanche to run your computer like they run your phone (uh-oh! Out of Internetminutes? Here's your overage fee faggot, along with the $12.99 you owe us fo visiting a non-AT&T-Sponsored website! We'll bring up your complaints at the next board meeting while we work out new non-competition clauses with our *wink*competitors*wink*wink*, non-competing over captive audiences for doing little else but providing next-to-nil service on fiber lines, and we'll be sure to thank you so much for voting to let us be competitive in all this non-competition!

If one of you dipshits thinks this is going to help any of us, please, enlighten me on a single thing this will improve for the "customer." Speed? Infrastructure? Are we going to see price reductions?

I guess what I'm saying is "raise your hand if you're delusional enough to believe that you're helping yourself by enriching people who fight daily for what is, essentially, the privilege to mug you for your lunch money."

If you had any sense, or balls, you'd rally behind Sherman Anti-Trusting telecoms into tiny chunks and forcing them to compete.