I have a serious question for Trump supporters. Why do you support such a divisive candidate...

I have a serious question for Trump supporters. Why do you support such a divisive candidate? Violence only occurs at Trump rallies. Regardless of who throws the first punch, the fact of the matter is that Trump is the only candidate whose rallies regularly cause people to behave like animals. Even if you believe Trump's policies are the best for America, you cannot deny that he is a polarizing figure. Isn't a good president supposed to unite people?

Other urls found in this thread:

nytimes.com/video/us/100000004269364/trump-and-violence.html
twitter.com/NSFWRedditImage

First post is always the best post

>I have a loaded question for Trump supporters.
To piss faggots like you off.

>victim blaming
GET YOUR HATRED OFF THIS BOARD!

But you are the first post

wow, really makes you think huh?

It's violent because liberals can't protest peacefully.

>violence
>implying it's not instigated by George Soros funded protesters

no because if white people are allowed to actually do what they feel without repercussions we will kill all the minorities

just let them try and fight us i hope they do

Shitposting aside, how is trump the "divisive" candidate, when it was him that got democrats and republicans to unite to stop him?

Hopefully this won't be a 300 reply thread with only one post from the OP

The Establishment hates Trump because he is the only one who is opposing their globalist agenda in the U.S. and has the financial means to campaign without their controlling bribe money. They only seek to destroy him and mock, discredit and degrade him in their Media. Trump is dedicated to keeping America from becoming another socialist, illegal alien government entitlement hell hole.

The Jews use the Muslims as WMD the same way they use the niggers to attack the white people in Europe and the US all while they sit back and watch the carnage. The Muslims like the niggers are the symptoms of the Jew disease.

Weak b8.

Try harder.

He's uniting the right people against the wrong people

How is this a loaded question? I think it's pretty fair to say Trump is a polarizing candidate.

Still, his rhetoric is the thing that incites the protests. Why do you want someone like that to be president?

Establishment politicians are trying to stop him, sure. I'm talking about average citizens. Are you arguing that he doesn't polarize people?

It's not bait, I'm genuinely curious.

Donald Trump is a unifier. He's gonna fix the immigration crisis in a way that makes both Democrats and Republicans happy. He can propose things that racists will go along with that Hillary could never propose because she's hated that much. Donald Trump has the courage to put forward slam-dunk solutions that everyone can get behind. He's willing to think outside the box and he's gonna surround himself with the best people. He wants to get things done and thats what we need.

But why do you think this is good? How will this help the country?

used to be a Bernie supporter until I actually did some research. Not only that but seeing the violence being displayed by Bernie supporters and then pinned on Trump further solidified my choice to vote for him. Then I did more research and found out that George Soros is funding these protests and now I am 110% behind Trump.

Why do his rallies require such a strong police presence?

But there are plenty of instances in which Trump supporters throw the first punch.

>why support someone when violent coloured criminals disagree with him?
>this is a question the libcucks actually have
It must suck being that cucked.

>incites

I don't think you know what this word means.

Incitement is when you specifically call for someone to do something. If you say something that makes someone angry enough to chimp out, that's not incitement, that's a 'provocation' at best, which is neither a crime nor is it particularly wrong. The person who riots still has moral agency and still must be held solely accountable for their own actions.

This reasoning is on the same tier as "she dressed that way so she incited rape", which is clearly ridiculous and reprehensible.

Please be more careful with your thinking in future user. Cheers.

>Isn't a good president supposed to unite people?

Yes.

There are very bad people out there who are very scared, understandably so. The media has done much to stir up fear against Trump. People who listen to what he's actually saying realize he's not Hitler and his ideas make sense.

I'm a dem but I cant get behind either Hill or Sanders. Trump has what it takes to get things done.

>Isn't a good president supposed to unite people?

He's no more divisive than Clinton, that the protesters are acting like animals has more to do with the shekels they're being paid than

Fuck it, Fuck this sliding shit

His detractors are the ones who are divisive.

They seek to intimidate us, but they will only continue as long as we indulge them

Because of this.

I have a serious question for Sanders supporters. Why do you support such a divisive candidate? Violence only manifests at Sanders rallies. Regardless of who throws the first punch, the fact of the matter is that Sanders is the only candidate whose rallies regularly cause people to behave like cucks. Even if you believe Sander's policies are the best for America, you cannot deny that he is a polarizing figure. Isn't a good president supposed to unite people?

come to a Trump rally and find your answer.

1-To piss you off
2-Hes not divisive they literally pay people to protest him.

I doubt trump is polarizing the people, I blame the media for that.

One example is that nigger on msnbc or whatever that was triggered to see a black trump supporter saying "all the race baiting needs to stop" then she says "well let's be clear not all trump supporters are black"

No the only thing that incites violence is the liberals and the liberal media. The reason this happens is because those in charge are afraid of him. This is why we need trump.

>Isn't a good president supposed to unite people?

Trump is uniting people. NatSocs, Jews, Fascists, Freedom lovers. All are uniting behind Donald. Only the brainwashed masses are against him and rioting. Trump is offering a brighter future for all american citizens, and the only people opposing him are those who have shut off their critical thinking abilities and instead opened their minds to world order propaganda.

The people protesting him have no idea what his rhetoric even is. They just heard the media say he hates Muslims and Mexicans.

>Violence only occurs at Trump rallies

Yeah because media brainwashed buffoons are inciting it.

>Isn't a good president supposed to unite people?

He's already got jews and neo-nazi's agreeing that he's the man to vote for.

If that's not unity I don't know what is

>IMPLYING OBAMA ISN'T ALREADY THE KING DIVIDER

RACE WAS LESS OF AN ISSUE WHEN BUSH WAS PRESIDENT

OBAMA HAS ALREADY DIVIDED US AND YOURE ALL JUST GOING TO BLAME THE GUY WHO HASN'T DONE SHIT YET

LEFTISTS DIVIDE AND CONQUER

I supported Trump until I read this post OP. It really made me think, ya know? I'm supporting Hillary now.

George soros pays off protestors.
They're essentially a foreign mercenary army sent to disturb the rallies, not citizens with sincere greivences.
And even when they are sincere protestors with greivences, there are instigators present doing their darn best to make them violent, or they actually arent citizens as we see in arizona.

I dont support the man because im a libertarian at core, but he hasnt said anything outright wrong, and it really makes you think when a foreign national sends mercs after him for merely repeating government published stats.

Shut the fuck up you dumbshit nigger cunt.

I don't want unity, I don't want stability, I just want the people who I hate to suffer. Even if he will not generate a genocide like dumbfuck Bernie supporters think he will, there is no way that the deportations will go without a casualty or two. I just want to see minorities suffer. Who knows, maybe one of his policies during his second term or sooner will be to "solve the issue of metropolitan black crime" or something like that.

Because fuck Hillary

>But there are plenty of instances in which Trump supporters throw the first punch.

After being agitated and baited by Bernie freaks.

How many Trump supporters have gone to Dem rallies and caused problems?

nytimes.com/video/us/100000004269364/trump-and-violence.html

Nice try at bad semantics.

>Violence only occurs at Trump rallies.

You'd think if it was just Trump and his supporters being violent they'd happen at every rally but his.

because fuck you

Trump is also the only candidate speaking out about illegal immigration, Islamic Terrorism (most people won't even name it), awful "free trade" deals, and the fact that most of our politicians are fucking inept manchildren with no understanding of how dangerous the world really is. We don't like in "a time of peace" like some would like to think. It's not as if violent conflict is simply gone because it's 2016, but we've all let our guard down. And now Mexico is invading our southern states, Europe is being invaded by hordes of violent 7th century migrants, Russia and China are catching up to the US in terms of military and technology, and all the other politicians seem to care about is gender identity issues and other trivial nonsense.

...

>Violence only occurs at Trump rallies.
Because libs can't handle people disagreeing with them
>Regardless of who throws the first punch, Trump is the only candidate whose rallies regularly cause people to behave like animals
lmao, "regardless of the first punch", upi had to throw that in because it's always Bernie supporters. Wouldn't that mean that Bernie is the only candidate who causes people to behave like animals? No Trump supporters are invading Bernie or Hillary rallies and harassing people. But no, it's Trump's fault right? retard.
>Isn't a good president supposed to unite people?
No president will ever unite people, there are two distinct parties, two distinct ideologies, no one will jump ship that easily.
>Why do you support such a divisive candidate?
He's shaking up the establishment, it's a beautiful thing. Anti-Trumpsters are the American versions of "Uncle Toms" and they don't even know what they're against, they just follow what the TV tells them to. They are controlled by the very people that ae fucking up America,the very people that Trump is against, the very people Trump is scaring the shit out of.

oh op you ignorance is killing me. While I dislike trump I does take two to tango. The issue actually lies with the protesters who get violent and disruptive. If I were to protest trump at a rally I would remain a respectful distance from his rally with signs and I would obey the police and I would be a decent human being not lighting stuff on fire smashing cop cars and in general just causing damage to public property. while what trump says can be construed as racist and some of his supporters are most definitely racist America is a land of free speech and it is protected by law. What is not protected by law is destruction of public property and violence. Also we must not that there are those on the far neo left spectrum who are just as guilty as race baiting as trump

Bernie is equally divisive, but us Trump supporters act like grown adults not children. Anti Trump protesters are overgrown children who should be locked up in labor camps.

>incites
There are recordings of Trump at rallies literally "inciting" violence against protestors though.

Nope.

> If you see someone about to throw a tomato, knock the crap out of him. I promise I will pay for the legal fees.

nytimes.com/video/us/100000004269364/trump-and-violence.html

playing devils advocate but imagine you went to a Burnie rally and all of a sudden wild middle age white males appear making a shit ton of noise what are they doing they are carrying a banner and being disruptive. wow this is annoying. not only that but they are being pushy and shovey.

Yes this will happen, people are idiots but Trump responds by inciting violence while Bernie does everything he can to disarm situations like that as you can see with how he responded to those two BLM idiots.

>regularly cause people
>people

nope just illegals, faggot anarchists without a job and paid Soros protesters

All of which need to be deported.

There's also the simple fact that his opponents are a Jewish communist and the biggest corporate blue-waffle whore to ever walk the face of the earth. It's like choosing between a decently prepared baked potato, a steaming plate of cow shit, and the primed core of an atomic bomb.

I've actually entertained the idea to subvert trump supporters even though support trumps ideas. He's a pressure relief valve. Secretly I want the tank to blow so we can have a violent revolution. But I have children to think about so peaceful route it is. Trump actually is the peaceful candidate and you don't know it.

>Violence only occurs at Trump rallies.
we need more violence you fucking cuck
it's the answer to solving the civilizational decay that we're witnessing

Any of the Republican candidates would have been considered Hitler by the regressive left. It's just that Trump has consistently been the frontrunner. They've been soothed by 8 years of Obama and college safe spaces.

he's uniting the people against the leftist cancer you love so much.

Trump rallies don't cause violence.
Fascists who want to suppress ideas they don't like cause violence.

First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they fight you, then you win.

>Why do you support such a divisive candidate?

I'm not responsible for the behavior of others. If another grown human being wants to have emotional outbursts and throw an adult version of a temper tantrum (riot) then that's their fault, not mine.

An adult is not responsible for the actions of another adult. If somebody else has a problem with something I say, the problem is theirs, it belongs to them. it occurs in their skull, not in mine. They are responsible for their own thoughts.

What the left doesn't understand is a little thing called INDIVIDUAL RESPONSIBILITY. Some collective (society, the neighborhood, the city) isn't responsible for the individual failures of healthy adults, the person who makes the bad choice is.

OP, when you grow up you will face responsibility in life and it will not matter how you feel about it. Your SUBJECTIVE feelings won't effect the OBJECTIVE reality. That moment you will hopefully grow up and deal with it. At that moment and afterward you will understand how silly it is for somebody to demand you be responsible for the irresponsible people.

I have a serious question for rape victims

How can you seriously be mad that you were raped? You know that you're a female and yet you still went out and got raped. Regardless of who actually raped you, it's still your fault. What's wrong with you?

Bernie's people are obviously the most violent. It doesn't matter if they're protesting Trump or Hillary, they are uncouth, reprehensible violent thugs that don't respect democracy and the outcome of democratic contests. They're the ones burning American flags and cursing at veterans and children. They're the ones blocking roads, trying to storm private events, and assaulting law enforcement. Bernie says nothing to condemn them. You don't see Trump's supporters doing any of that. Or Hillary's. It's because career radical agitators flock to Bernie because he's a Socialist- he's a magnet for grievance mongers and anarchists who hate capitalism and democracy. He preaches failed ideas such as those of Hugo Chavez in Venezuela- and look where they are now. He praised the Castro crime family of Cuba, as well as the Sandinistas in Nicaragua. He had his honeymoon in the USSR for fuck's sake. He's a dangerous demagogue who appeals to stupid people who think their own misfortune or lack of achievement in life is the fault of somebody other than themselves. Which makes sense when you look at Bernie's past- a complete fucking loser until roughly age 40, who spent his time writing about rape fantasies for left-wing rags and signing people up for food stamps. Fuck Bernie.

he's uniting people and fucking over animals, I don't see any problem here. next

I want violence to occur in your home

Yikes, go easy on em bloodbath!

Victim blaming!
Victim blaming!
You are the same as people who say it's the wife's fault she gets beaten.
You are the same as someone who says women deserve rape!

Because anti-Trump protestors have proven they can be violent. Why do you keep blaming the victim instead of the perpetrator on this?

Even with individual responsibility, and other things Trump will actually probably help bring, how do you supporters get over the other stuff?
He will hurt everyone. The likely trade war that will ensue will harm all of the US. He doesn't understand how complex foreign policy is, he is a total buffoon. He changes his position for special interest groups like coal workers, who already wouldn't survive if it weren't for federal and state subsidies. He is proving himself to be no better than any other shill demagogue who just "wants to be president". I can't fathom how someone who says the things he says could possibly gain genuine support beyond the uneducated masses.
This guy say's he'll get along great with Putin, the person in direct conflict with US interests, yet he can barely get along with his own party. holy fuck
This man denies the FACT that Cali is in drought.

I want people to be responsible for themselves and I want the welfare state to end as much as the next guy, but is this worth it? It's like people listen more to the insults he constantly spews than use their head to think!

because we fucking hate liberals

>Isn't a good president supposed to unite people?

no.

>Violence only occurs at Trump rallies

No, these same people who VIOLENTLY attack Trump supporters and behave like the KKK when black people tried to attend school are always like this.

They're like that it in our neighborhoods that were once nice.

They're like that in our schools that we pay for and provide for them.

They're like that in our jails.

The problem isn't Trump. The problem isn't even Republicans or Democrats. These "people" are violent reactionaries who must either learn to behave like decent human beings or simply get the fuck out.

holy fuck sauce

Staci Silverstone and Tanya Tate

> Don't vote for Trump or we'll riot!

Sounds like leftest extortion, faggot.

Trump is a uniter, not a divider.

Look at who is causing the violence. Look at who is dividing Americans. It's not Trump and never is. Unless you mean he likes to divide Americans from the ILLEGAL IMMIGRANTS who are crossing the border and committing crimes? There's nothing wrong with that.

Race relations deteriorated under Obama. It's the worst it has ever been in decades. Under a Trump presidency, you'll see the racial tension ease. Trump wants to help all Americans, not just certain races or special interest groups (unlike Obama).

>says trump is polarizing
>Obama: "could have been my son."
>Bernie: "white people don't know what it's like to be poor."
>Hillary: literally everything out of her mouth.

...

>Violence only occurs at Trump rallies.

AHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

Nigger, have you been paying attention? 90% of all political violence this season is caused by leftists, dindus, and La Raza chimping out. You guys really hate law and order.

Bernie/Hill supporters literally march-around with Soviet and Mexican flags. Fucking obvious traitors.

>Iceland

Isn't your mainstream news written by socialist party bureaucrats in Reykjavik?

Robberies only occur in white neighborhoods, why do you condone those thieving white people?

>implying dems and reps aren't just 2 sides of the same coin
1-800-comeonnow.jpg