Why do scientists cling to retarded theories like the big bang? its just as stupid as religions

Why do scientists cling to retarded theories like the big bang? its just as stupid as religions.

How the fuck can nothing explode into the universe? want my opinion? the universe always existed.

Other urls found in this thread:

archive.fo/V3h6t
archive.fo/a1lJ4
archive.fo/1aCOs
archive.fo/Bjsqs
archive.fo/HwxX6
archive.fo/lyvW0
archive.fo/HzquC
telegraph.co.uk/culture/books/10654762/The-man-who-proved-Stephen-Hawking-wrong.html
twitter.com/SFWRedditVideos

no one wants your opinion, you're a fucking retard

Your mom wanted more than opinions last night in bed.

>doesn't understand something therefore its retarded

thats not how it works user

go ahead and explain how nothing became everything.

The universe is expanding therefore it started at a central point e.g. the big bang

it was never nothing, matter is just energy in a different form, the energy was always there, came from the big crunch, or even a collision with another multiverse, many theories about that, and we simply don't know yet

Ever wonder what happens when a computer is turned on foe the first.time? Or a new.program is booted up? Yeah, same fucking thing for.the universe. Our existence is all idealistic. Nothing is truly real. Basically virtual reality. Why do you thing albert eistein was so adamant on proving his buddy wrong? Or why elon musk loses sleep over this theory? Great minds are troubled by truths they have not yet learned to explain

You're opinion is worthless.

This universe was created by a superior identity a grup of scientist in a superior universe as an experiment to try to understand they own universe, yes op youare being watched and all this universe is just a couple of inches leight.
And all we call parallel universes are just diferent experiments with a minimiun variation .

>Exposed: How world leaders were duped into investing billions over manipulated global warming data
>archive.fo/V3h6t
>Whistle-Blower: ‘Global Warming’ Data Manipulated Before Paris Conference
>archive.fo/a1lJ4
>NOAA Attempts To Hide The Pause In Global Warming: The Most Disgraceful Cover-Up Since Climategate
>archive.fo/1aCOs
>Climate Change Hoax? NOAA Data Exaggerated Global Warming, Alleged Whistleblower Claims
>archive.fo/Bjsqs
>NOAA Scientists Falsify Data to Dupe World Leaders on Climate Change
>archive.fo/HwxX6
>Climate change: this is the worst scientific scandal of our generation
>archive.fo/lyvW0
>More Countries Caught Manipulating Their Climate Data
>archive.fo/HzquC

42

“See what happened wuz...is that there’s nothing, but then there’s a little something, then that little something blows up. Fast forward trillions of years and then you have a microwave.

No one asked. Your argument is pointless because you posted this in a place that doesn't care.
This is bait and you are not good at it, if anything you are a master baiter.

Ok doesn't even have an argument that requires to put forward points for your statement

If you want to argue about how the multiverse originated, or how the collective consciousness was born, then maybe you would be onto something. Saying the universe came from nothing is like ... uh... Egyptians thinking aliens are gods. Your point of view is much too nearsighted. Also weak bait but whatever.

1/10 bait. Go home you fucking omega.

The universe started with something, but no one on this planet knows exactly what that was, much less how it got there.

That is my argument, but if you're still not satisfied it's then my statement. Which again brings to light, no asked and no one cares.

but wut about b4 that, kiddo???!!

How can Elon musk be real if our realities aren't real
>real eyes
>realise
>real lies

In the beginning there was an opinion. It exploded!

elon doesn't lose sleep over theories he loses sleeps masturbating to sexy cat girl waifus like the rest of us

You see we wuz intergalactic kangz, mang. We got board of uor own univerze so we made thiz univerze mang.

>possibly eldritch horror

>the universe always existed

Never mind everything we know about the universe proves this isn’t true...

How is that any more feasible than the Big Bang as a natural materialist origins solution?

The reality is, natural materialism cant account for existence at all. Theism is actually far more rational on this point.

Okay then, how do you think the universe began user? There must have been a start point somewhere.

I know it's bait, but I'll bite. The big bang theory explains fuck all about the origin of the universe. What it explains is what happened (down to nanoseconds) after the universe began. All this 'nothing into something' pasta is just literal retardation

>the universe always existed.

But b-e-f-o-r-e that 'always', before it even existed, what was it then? Answer me that, faggot.

the big bang theory says the same, in most itterations. The Bigbang wasnt the "beginning" of everything just the beginning of our current system of time space and energy.

As for the the theory it self, the period of expansion at least is a proven fact, because it has been observed.
How the big bang it self played out is a little harder since you can only see what happened a very tiny fraaction of a second after the event it self because the event it self did simply not produce any light because it caused the things that emit the light to exist.

One of the basic laws of modern science is the Law of Conservation of Mass and Energy: all matter and energy has always existed and will always exist-- the forms may change, but matter and energy cannot "disappear."

The Big Bang theory is based on the observation that the Universe is expanding.

The Big Bang theory is a theory, the Law of Conservation of Mass and Energy is a Law of science.

You can argue a theory, but you're a cum-drooling moron if you argue the law.

Actually it was just random clouds of various forms of energy and radiation before that with very little matter. If the universe always existed then why is it expanding. Wouldn't it just be stationary. Why do you not think it's impossible for matter, space, and time to be created out of something other than what they are now. Do you have trouble comprehending the fact that time has physical and measurable factors other than units of chronological measurements. Do you have trouble comprehending things like the fact that space is not a distance but a 4 dimensional plane of interwoven fabric through which gravity is held. You're not a brainlet are you.

Because I'd Bang her Big time.

PLEASE nut in my ass!!!

the violation of that law has been observed, it is a relevant topic in physics if conservation of energy is actually an axiom.

In the beginning there was nothing. Then it exploded, and there was still nothing. But you could see it a lot better.

Doesn’t matter.

Eat. Fuck. Kill.

Theoretical science and theoretical physics in particular are exactly that...theories. Most of it is bullshit and has been proven to be bullshit...telegraph.co.uk/culture/books/10654762/The-man-who-proved-Stephen-Hawking-wrong.html

But they occasionally stumble upon useful shit, and what they are doing is certainly beneficial. I do get a bit aggravated at the cockiness of some of these people, but it is easy to cling to an idea when it is your own.

>Using UK Telegraph to disprove science

Whew, lad...

ITT:
"I have no idea what a theory is."

Got any cool Daily Mail articles?

Oh, or how about The Onion?

Explain how something has always been? Nobody can explain nothing that's why they are all theories? Not enough time for 1 person to come up with the answer

The word "theory" has a different meaning in science as compared to everyday usage. You're thinking of the word "hypothesis".

no one knows you fuck.
>bigbang.gif = running theory based on current evidence, subject to change
>religion = blinding unquestionable doctrine stating some fat fuck created us to torture us
I'd ask you to go back to school but the American education system has obviously failed the lot of us

>the violation of that law has been observed,

Bullshit, the "violations" of the Law of Conservation of Mass and Energy are simply unmeasurable subreactions.

If you think that you, or your idiot Chem 101 T.A. can generate a paradigmatic shift in scientific knowledge, get ready to be urinated on by the science community.

How did it originate? Probably quantum fluctuations. Turns out if you calculate the mass energy in the universe it's equal to gravitational negative energy which is exactly what you would expect if the universe originated from a singularity.

Damn she looks like Asuka. She should cosplay as her, she'd make bank.

Yep. This is exactly the conclusion I came to as a teen.

The irony with this post is that he has nothing to prove that the universe always existed. We just don't know. He big bang is just the "best" theory that we have. Nice bait

>Turns out if you calculate the mass energy in the universe it's equal to gravitational negative energy

Gee, that sounds pretty easy; just calculate the mass energy in the Universe.

Fucking moron.

Good I like being watched. This really turns me on

Why does there have to be a start? Time is just a measurement.

the big bang is a good explaination because we can directly measure all of the galaxies around us. When we did it and plotted what direction they were going, we determined that all the galaxies are moving away from each other. The space between them is growing. So when you play the tape backwards, something that is growing outwards can be reversed and you can see everything comes back to a single point. Just as if you played a video of an explosion backwards. Everything condenses.

You can tell by the light if something is moving away from you. It can be directly measured.

If the Big Bang didn't work, neither would our GPS satellites. GPS has to take into the account of speed of light otherwise your GPS is going to be off and you won't be within feet of your location.

Einsteins theory of relativity seems like a nebulous things, but it is something we use in practice everyday and don't even realize it.

It always existed but it was once a small singular dense point

Watch out, OP, your egocentrism is showing.

> (OP)
>
>>the universe always existed
>
>Never mind everything we know about the universe proves this isn’t true...
What.
>How is that any more feasible than the Big Bang as a natural materialist origins solution?
>
>The reality is, natural materialism cant account for existence at all. Theism is actually far more rational on this point.
What.

There is no before eternity. Matter cannot be created or destroyed.

....sigh
Yes, it can... it can be turned into energy and vice versa.

>Solipsism.

Because they are sinners.

We don't know. All we know is that the universe is expanding because every light in the night sky is redshifted. Run the clock backwards and everything must've been closed together. Everything else is inferred from what we already know about physics.

Nice argument retard, first you claim the theorised end of the universe is what caused the theorised start of the universe, then it somehow links into another unproven, unsupported THEORY about multiple universes (good luck coming up with empirical data to support that theory faggots) and then you finish with the correct answer, which is WE DONT KNOW

If you actually give credibility to the big bang just because le sciencetists said so then you are a fucking spazzoid who has successfully been brainwashed by the mass media jews. What do these scientists see that we don't? Objects moving away from each other? Maybe god came down and gave them a fucking push. Maybe a dinosaur the size of your mum farted and thats why every galaxy is running away from each other. Both are now theories. You can look up the definition of theory and you will have to agree.

Are you fucking dumb? The big bang has nothing to do with GPS, general relativity, or the speed of light. Red shift is not the big bang. Red shift can exist without the big bang. Come back when you leave grade 9 you pretentious retard fuck, you don't even understand a smidgen of relativity theory