What are your major red flags when discussing film with someone?
>they use the word "badass"
>they use the term "Gary stu"
>their favorite movies are Tarantino films
>they praise a movie for "subverting tropes"
What are your major red flags when discussing film with someone?
Other urls found in this thread:
archive.4plebs.org
twitter.com
>they praise a movie for "subverting tropes"
Very good pick here are some of mine
>People who say ''Film is supposed to be entertainment!''
>People who have 2001, Seven Samurai, Citizen Kane, other pleb shit on their top lists
>People who have seen 1 film made before the 50s and think they have taste
>People who like Wes Anderson and think they somehow have taste
>People with most movies on list made in last 20 years
>People who have no foreign language movies listed
>People who think korean cinema is good
>People who have movies from Nolan, Tarantino, Aronofsky, Kubrick, Refn, Snyder on their list
>People who have any comic book movie listed
>People who say comfy/based
Using any cuckwords from Sup Forums
This pasta is stale as fuck
archive.4plebs.org
>>People who have 2001, Seven Samurai, Citizen Kane, other pleb shit on their top lists
Oh shit, BTFO
Maybe people should start developing some taste then it wouldn't have to be posted again and again.
Guys that post things like this.
>>People who say comfy/based
true
not once have i seen someone with merit/have something that holds up say those words
>developing some taste
Says the retarded contrarian lol
>people who praise talentless hacks like Korine, Von Trier and Cronenberg who built their reputation on cheap shock value
>unironically saying kiuno, reddit and plab/patrician
Tarantino has made several good films. Jackie Brown and Reservoir Dogs are quality
>people who hate on Tarantino and Nolan to fit in and thinking despising popular things makes them patrican
The biggest red flag is when I ask them what their favorite classic film is and they mention something from the 70s or later
Also if they make any comments about how a film has "aged" like a movie is a living being or some stupid shit
...
I don't hate Nolan to be contrarian, he's simply a horrible director. At least Tarantino embraces his schlocky exploitation roots, Nolan is a tryhard faggot who thinks his movies are art, it's actually kind of pathetic
This
nolan is a exposition cliche fag he isnt a director
>cringe
>kino
>think children of men is a good movie
>Nolan is a tryhard faggot who thinks his movies are art
No he doesn't
also variations of kino (ie capekino, tvkino, etc)
Whenever I see a bingo image posted on Sup Forums, you can feel whoever made the image was having fun with the board/general thread's inside jokes, this is not the case for Sup Forums's bingo image, whoever made it was extremely butthurt.
yes he does, you can tell by he and his brother's sloppy attempts to shove in symbolism and socio-political commentary
Nolan is the film industry equivalent of that annoying kid you knew in high school who is always trying to look smarter than everyone else but we all knew he was an idiot
no he made it about this guy
the korinefag, its entirely true
>the character had no arc
You know who had an ark? Noah
>666
Noah confirmed fine cinema