Why it's time to ban pornography

>Even the rise of Donald Trump provides evidence of pornography's social harm. How to understand the success of Trump's makeup-caked, misogynistic candidacy, except as an eruption onto the political stage of the pornographic subterrain?
>If you cringe at Trump's sneering misogyny, then join me in calling for a ban on the thing that made his crude appeal possible. Pornography's enjoyments may be private, but its harms are inescapably public.

Is he right? Is porn's impact on society visible through the success of Donald Trump?

theage.com.au/comment/the-case-for-banning-pornography-20160529-gp6vg7.html

Other urls found in this thread:

youtube.com/watch?v=aWM4bJNpch0
paramocinhos.com.br/2016/01/drag-luz-violeta-faz-video-tutorial.html
twitter.com/SFWRedditGifs

Porn is the globalists greatest weapon.

Trump is winning because of porn

You can't make this shit up, the libturds have no clue

Please continue..

NO!!!!!!!!!!!!

BAN IT

> we need censorship
> Is he right?
Not really.

This is completely fucking stupid on every level. There's just so many places to start.

>now it's LITERALLY porn that is responsible for Trump

You literally can't make this up.

> searching memes to justify censorship
It`s actually pretty smart and very signifying. Jews are on the move. They just did not find the right meme yet.

...

Trump is gonna win because you touch yourself at night.

Funny thing is that banning porn seems to be a common goal of SJWs and Sup Forums. Should you not be feeding those delusions?

this cunt will ban it if you vote for her

dont vote for this femiscum

Yes but for real reasons

>Gail Dines, a feminist scholar who has succeeded Andrea Dworkin as the leading voice against pornography, has found that "the most popular acts depicted in internet porn include vaginal, oral and anal penetration by three or more men at the same time; double anal; double vaginal; a female gagging from having a penis thrust into her throat; and ejaculation in a woman's face, eyes and mouth." This is not sex-positivity; it is hatred of women. According to one survey, boys are inducted into this ritualised hatred at an average age of 11.

Today on "women who are mad that they never got threeway fucked by chads"

No, what am i saying. She absolutely got threeway fucked by chads.

>every time you fap, Trump's poll numbers go up

>How to understand the success of Trump's makeup-caked, misogynistic candidacy, except as an eruption onto the political stage of the pornographic subterrain?

what the fuck?

You won't see anything similar to this on Salon or any other big leftist rag. This is not remotely common among SJWs.

DO YOUR PART TODAY!

>trump is porn's fault
this is next level shitposting. sasuga australia-senpai

with a face like that she got zeroway fucked

I have a vagina and I enjoy porn.

These 'feminists' are simply puritans who get off on banning pleasure.

What do feminists think of gay pornography?
They can't say women are being objectified and abused. I remember seeing one saying that it was just as bad because one takes the "role" of woman but this doesn't really apply if they switch positions or if they are doing frot instead of anal.

Text to avoid clicking bait:

It is time to ban pornography.

Nothing can shock us except this suggestion. We find it perfectly acceptable that smut, no matter how bestial or misogynistic, should be widely available. We even think it a moral imperative, a dictate of freedom. It does not trouble us that children can view acts of rape, real or simulated, with a click of a mouse, but if someone proposes that we prevent them from doing so, dirty old Uncle Sam begins to shudder. Respected citizens stand up to object. Gallant young civil libertarians come riding into town, ready to defend the imperiled modesty of Lady Liberty.

"Ban" strikes us as a nasty word, conjuring up memories of McCarthyism, the Spanish Inquisition and the third-grade teacher who washed your mouth out with soap. We tell ourselves that bans are never really effective, that it is too hard to distinguish between what should be banned and what shouldn't. Above all, we know that bans are blunt instruments, and believe that we are too sophisticated to employ such crude tools.

But are bans really so terrifying and impossible?

We are not averse to banning something when we think it is really wrong. We are happy to "ban" murder, rape and even certain types of speech (try yelling "Fire!" in a theatre). We do not hesitate over the fact that there will be marginal cases, or that the banned activity will not magically be brought to an end. Our tolerant reaction to pornography stems less from a principled commitment to free speech than from a belief that porn isn't so bad after all. Shouldn't we be "sex-positive"? Who doesn't need a little release?
>cont'd

This is quite honestly some Ted Cruz-tier bullshit, like this is literally something he'd say.

This is fucking bullshit, put porn should be banned.
>B-but m-muh freedoms
Destroying your brain and corrupting our youth= freedom? Right.
youtube.com/watch?v=aWM4bJNpch0 I know that like 60% of Sup Forums are dumb redditors who have been on this website for like 6 months, so share this with all of your redditor newfag friends.

>Should you not be feeding those delusions?

I honestly wish the SJWs would succeed and ban it so that I can sit back and watch The Great Rape unfold (but not participate, because I've got like eight terabytes stashed away)

This casual attitude would be impossible if we cared as much about misogyny as we say we do. Gail Dines, a feminist scholar who has succeeded Andrea Dworkin as the leading voice against pornography, has found that "the most popular acts depicted in internet porn include vaginal, oral and anal penetration by three or more men at the same time; double anal; double vaginal; a female gagging from having a penis thrust into her throat; and ejaculation in a woman's face, eyes and mouth." This is not sex-positivity; it is hatred of women. According to one survey, boys are inducted into this ritualised hatred at an average age of 11.

Restrictions on pornography may come sooner than we think. As the Christian right has lost its power, fears of a censorious "Moral Majority" have receded. This leaves room for activists on the left to criticise the misogyny of porn without seeming like the allies of the unenlightened.

Happily, the left appears ready to take up the censor's task. Campus activists – once champions of free speech – now call for safe spaces, trigger warnings and other hard limits on speech, especially on speech related to sex. Now that they feel confident in their cultural power, campus activists have ceased to plead for tolerance; they are ready to enforce compliance.

It is easy to criticise such reversals as hypocritical, but they reflect a basic truth, pointed out by Stanley Fish: "There's no such thing as free speech." Or, to put it another way, there are always limits on speech. The only question is who places those limits, and where. Even in the most laissez-faire society, some forms of speech will be tolerated while others will not. We say that "fighting words" or "incitements to violence" are not really speech. Why not say the same of pornography, which serves as an instruction manual for the subjection of women?

At this point, someone will object that limitations on pornography would violate the First Amendment. Is that really so?

>cnt

Well, no, and not just because of the long (and not entirely ignoble) history of censorship. Law bends to the contours of culture, and more or less liberty will be granted to activities – be they religious or pornographic – depending on how harmful they are perceived to be.

Even the rise of Donald Trump provides evidence of pornography's social harm. How to understand the success of Trump's makeup-caked, misogynistic candidacy, except as an eruption onto the political stage of the pornographic subterrain?

If you cringe at Trump's sneering misogyny, then join me in calling for a ban on the thing that made his crude appeal possible. Pornography's enjoyments may be private, but its harms are inescapably public.

>all those syllables

A lot of words and nothing was said. Ban leftism.

It might be truer to say she got threeway fucked by chads one time, when they were all extremely drunk, then they threw her the fuck out and had a laugh about it.

>le ban something that has been around for thousands of years

Porn is like the toothpaste getting out of the tube.

Freedom is the freedom to decide for ourselves. If someone wants to fuck up their brain through porn, then so be it.

Keeping the youth away from it is the parents' job, not the government's.

post boi pussy pls

t. 18yo pretending to be le supreme gentleman

i doubt triple penetration or dvda are the most popular porn

This.

Also you don't need porn until you watch it.
It just feels like it makes your life easier but it doesn't.

If you don't like porn, then don't watch it.

>normies like porn
>Thinking that if you link porn to trump this will stop people voting trump

Source on that pic?

The author of this crap claims to be a fervent Christian but....

(((Matthew Schmitz))) pic related

Honestly, I smell a rat. Pic related.

Fuck off shill.

It's ok user everyone goes through their edgy libertarian phase, you'll understand the error in your ways one day.

That does it. I'm now #WhackItForDonald

Speak for yourself. I barely even watch porn anymore and have never even developed depraved fetishes.

Maybe if you are some NEET autist who does nothing but edge all day you will get affected by porn.

Everytime you wank he cries. Dont masturbate. Make Jesus happy.

POO

>Fuck off shill.

No. Now go tip your fedora and pretend to be a white knight elsewhere. Poser.

Porn is the closes I will ever get to sex, I really would prefer if it didn't get banned.
The moment porn is not on the menu there will be a lot more people shooting up malls and schools, just saying.

It;s just first image from a googling search for porn that wasn't just people fucking.

I can see some sense in banning it in inferior nations such as Spain.

Obivously not ubt we should ban porn yes

Find me the fucking source right now Bruce

This is the sort of shit that makes betas think girls want to be rescued from Chad when they actually love it when he cums on their eye.

It's also the shit that sets betas up to believe the "abuse" backstory that every lying whore has to justify why she won't fuck her betabux provider after he marries her and adopts her three kids

You are so wrong as to be dangerous.

Pornography consumption should be mandatory.

"muh American fredooooooom"
The ban is not about you fuckface

Honestly I only think that super depraved fetish porn is what fucks people up. I don't think anyone ever ruined their lives over bangbros.

It saves you from shit like that pic

You just became my favorite user

I wish they could ban it, just so niggers and leftists would end up dead.

SJW and feminazis goal is to ban all what men like. They ban pedophilia (pedophilic magazines in 1970's america/germany/sweden say hello - it was normal back then) and soon they will ban all the normal porn in america and even looking at real naked women will be punishable. Look how your america is going to shit. They censor women cloths in video games, they force hate speech against women or feminazis. They force double standards. You're going to shit amerifats. All because you are that stupid. SJW are worse than chistfags ever were.

America will be the new south korea.

Yeah nah

Better up that number desu

>German supporting censorship
I suppose I shouldn't have expected anything else.

One cannot even legally perform the pledge of allegiance salute in your country.

>The moment porn is not on the menu there will be a lot more people shooting up malls and schools, just saying.

A little at first, then as guys' testosterone and ability to experience arousal from 3DPG returns their jewpill programming will break down and they'll just go out and start raping bitches

Stacey a best.

Doing my part senpai.

>Dat Dash

>Pornography's enjoyments may be private, but its harms are inescapably public.

Sounds like an educational sermon from the 50's.

Porn should be banned. It was popularized by the French. The French also came up with existentialism. Fuck them both, porn is shit.

Got a problem with Freedom, fucking faggot?

>yall act like there's something WRONG with a girl acting like a disgusting whore who's entitled to a man's money

HOL UP

> Why it's time to ban pornography
> on Sup Forums

Seriously user, you can't think of anything better to do with your free time?

>if you don't give Muslims what they want they'll kill you
>if you don't give virgins what they want they'll kill you
I am against banning porn, but you must realize what you sound like.

Pretty sure it was the germans that came up with and popularized porn. And gay bars. And strip clubs. And fetish clubs. And transsexualism. And most degeneracy, actually.

muh rhetoric

Hell yes.

I wonder if Dash supports Trump officially.

What did you say fgt?

>"Porn looses men's need for women just enough that they being thinking about more than pandering to twat."

Sounds like a good thing to me.

You don't need to be an autist to get affected by the leisure industry.

There's people that gambled or did drugs once or twice and there's perfectly functional people that didn't see it coming and got hooked up in that shit.

Measuring only the extremes to value the harm of something is idiotic.

Do people need porn? No.
Can people be harmed by it? Yes.
Ban it.

Did he punch her because she refused to not use a toilet?

You have to go back to the multiverse Jahans.

The """"""woman""""""" is a trap.

paramocinhos.com.br/2016/01/drag-luz-violeta-faz-video-tutorial.html

Do people need electricity? No.
Can people be harmed by it? Yes.
Ban it.

see

>It was popularized by the French.

You sure? I thought porn had been a popular part of every civilisation for thousands of years.

Yeah I took one look at that pic and knew there was no way that was a female

>What to do when your new wife asks where the bathroom is

Yeah, the penis really gives it away.

porn is a tool used to control the masses more easily

Gonna need a source on that.

It's a he not she.

Are you mentally handicapped?
People don't need electricity?

I can never tell with Indians.

>2016
>not knowing about the influencial power that sex has over humans

No. It's just easily fulfilling a biological urge. There might be someone trying to exploit that necessity for social control, but by and large it's just someone giving the people what they want to make money.

Im Polish visiting germanistan
Yeah it leads to something like the usa is today. People must be controled democracy is a meme that Stoped to be funny.

The funny thing is that a lot of you praise Hitler, while he would ban almost everything.

Simple, You don't marry her.

We managed without it for thousands of years.

>Spanish Intellectual

What the fuck is this shit? I she Pooman?

>feminist scholar

Image related.

>"..the most popular acts depicted in internet porn include..."

They include those things which people most prefer.

The more you know.

>"This is not sex-positivity..."

No, that is your interpretation of what is going on. It seems to me that the "free love" people of the 60's and 70's hippie culture would see this as the ultimate culmination of their wishes.

>"....it is hatred of women."

No, it is consenting adults using their own agency to decide how express their sexuality through whatever means they find most fulfilling. Essentially, they are using their own bodies in whatever manner they please.

I thought it was one of the points of feminism that women should be able to do whatever the hell they want with their bodies, and yet, that they should never be shamed for doing these things.

>According to one survey, boys are inducted into this ritualised hatred at an average age of 11.

A survey? How the fuck does a survey determine this?

Sounds like more trumped up bullshit to me.