Review praises record to high heaven

>review praises record to high heaven
>only 3.5 stars
>check profile
>see this

is it autism?

Other urls found in this thread:

rateyourmusic.com/~kkangpa
rateyourmusic.com/~Reasonable_Object
twitter.com/NSFWRedditImage

giving a shit about anyone's curve is autism

Miss me with that negative shit.

what's the perfect one

Are rym curves a good indicator for autism?

this is exactly how a rating system should be

people need to learn that 7 is not average

standard deviation skewed slightly towards above average because you're usually listening to music that you'll probably like. Unless you listen to something whether or not you think you'll like it or not, but that's a whole different type of autism

what's the sole 5

...

:^)

faggots

lovely

>wrote the review years ago and has since changed the rting
>doesn't have a rating system that conforms to your idea of a good rating system
if you think about it for a second you'll realize you're the autistic one. any functioning member of society doesn't care

if most of the music you're listening to is above a 2.5, you aren't listening to enough music

...

>you aren't listening to enough music
You aren't making it sound like a good thing, ya know?

autism is posting about someone elses dumbass opinions on Sup Forums, yes.

>listening to albums you don't like all the way through just to give it a low rating on a Taiwanese manicure forum

2.5 shouldn't mean bad, just largely unremarkable
if you listen to a lot of diverse music, you'll end up listening to a lot of forgettable stuff, true, but you could also discover amazing
discovery id the best part of listening to music

this korean girl's

rateyourmusic.com/~kkangpa

If you listen to things you don't enjoy for the sole purpose of downrating them on rym then you're a self absorbed idiot

this one is nice

boo


seems forced desu

terrible

serge gainsbourg
rateyourmusic.com/~Reasonable_Object
he's 17 so you gotta forgive his taste

these

i only regret all the hours i wasted listening to trash music just so i could say i've listened to an album front to back

there's nothing self-absorbed about trying to fairly assess an album
also why do you think a 2.5 is bad it is mathematically average

The Scaruffi one.

music is pretty good

Not him, but I don't listen to music I think is "average."
2.5 is equal to neutral/mixed feelings for me.

But almost every single album I listen to these days is either A) By an artist I enjoy B) Off a Sup Forumscore chart C) Off the top 1000 on RYM D) Something some rec'd me or E) Something that just came out that has good ratings

In other words, unless something has at the very least a 6-7/10+ rating on average from most sources (usually more though) I honestly just put it on my backlog and listen to things that seem more promising.

>buy

Pretty much only listen to stuff that I really like.

Here's some home grown autism for you all

>Not using 3 of them
Why tho?

Waste of time deciding if something is 1 or 1.5. I don't care about the things I rate that low.

i dare you to criticise this

I have Asperger's and mine looks a lot like that

>going out of your way to give a score bellow 3

Why ?

autism

why not? all it does is give more room for expression of an opinion, strengthening your higher scores

If you have more 1.5s than 4s then you are purposely going out of your way to listen to bad music

what's asperger's like
i have three friends with asperger's and i feel like it'd be rude to ask what it's like to have it

maybe 1.5 is a good score

most autistic curve i've seen

Which one of you is this?

Some guy just copied _no's shoddy rating scale and added a bit more autism to it.

For the same reason that i wont go back to the food truck to complain that my burger was too dry.

I ignore it, never buy anything else from then and keep on with my life..

maybe it's not, seeing as it is in the bottom third of the possible scores

maybe they only need two ratings for things they dislike

So much insecurity in this here thread.
Worry about ya own ratings, ya pinheads.

I have a profound sense of anxiety for one, mostly due to repeatedly failed attempts at social integration and failure to understand or recognize what's normally considered basic social cues and mainstays of human companionship. To many, it's perceived as an inherent lack of empathy or simply social retardation but either way, it feels like my way of thinking and responding to things is completely off-base and overly analytical/convoluted to the normal person so I try to isolate myself as much as possible and commit to a solitary lifestyle. Best way I know to explain it

Standard deviation would only be expected when you listen to music blindly. Any time you listen to something based on a recommendation, the cover art or anything else, it will heavily skew how your curve will look like.

>Standard deviation would only be expected when you listen to music blindly.
additionally would require an impartial judgement of the piece due to personal preference skewing it
a normal distribution is not natural on rym and only occurs when someone is making a conscious effort to make their ratings looks pretty
its also autismal to spend time thinking about just how much you didnt like something like your never gonna come back to anything below a 2.5 might as well just lump them all into 0.5 and call it a day

...

rate my wang mu

this guy gets it

is there a more plebe rating model than "bell curve centering at 3"? i think not.

this, if you actually explore music beyond fucking Sup Forumscore than you are bound to listen to plenty of average or even crappy albums, but you will also discover incredible music and not just be another basic Sup Forums drone

too few ratings to really matter what your curve looks like
these are fine
I guess this one's fine but I'm curious as to why you didn't label the top three
interesting, though I don't see why you wouldn't ever use the bottom few
bretty alright
too few ratings to really matter what your curve looks like
I actually kinda like the whole buyer's remorse thing, this is an interesting curve
I feel like you keep track of your ratings carefully because that curve is almost mirrored.
this is fine
what the fuck
this guy needs to lighten up and maybe find a different method of discovering music because it doesn't seem like he enjoys it much.
again, what the fuck
this is fine

it's really sad you think you're doing something right because you find music outside of Sup Forums charts and waste time listening to a whole lot of shitty music

those aren't achievements son

If you like an album, giving it a review that lowers its average rating is autism. I shouldn't have to explain this to people.

This is a decent curve. I think it uses the 2.5's rather than the 3'd too much but the dude is not pretencious. Also a 3.5 for me is anything from a 7.5-8.5 so thats a high score in retrospect.

Truly bad. Too much on the top. Not everything is that good unless you are only listening to stuff you know you are going to like a lot.

Terrible. Truly terrible. I don't get the point of throwing everything you are not going to revist as a 0.5 because it trying to seperate the good from the bad you are neglecting to even care about the majority of the music you hear.

I truly do not understand this curve

>Not everything is that good unless you are only listening to stuff you know you are going to like a lot.
That's a majority of what I listen to, yes.
Fuck off, Montie.

I'm not saying that is a bad thing at all. It's just not what I do.

>I'm not saying that's a bad thing
>"Truly bad"