Why do Libertarians love him so much?

Why do Libertarians love him so much?

Other urls found in this thread:

imgur.com/RtVPQWy
youtube.com/watch?v=3mq5hrUDoYo
google.com/#q=define socialism
twitter.com/AnonBabble

Because he's socially liberal and is the only major candidate who will protect American privacy rights.

He is the ideal form of feeling based irrationality liberals base their lives around, morally(not logically) Bernie is superior to every other candidate.

>socialist
>"protect American privacy rights"

Hahahahaha, fucking leaf.

Who is Rand Paul

>Who is Rand Paul
Didn't he drop out of the race?

Because libertarians are children who stopped mentally developing after their sophomore year in high school

So the CIA is socialist?

The future is libertarians, the world hasn't developed enough to truly endure the ideology. You think colonizing offworld planets will be like Hitler or Stalin?

Good news is he wants to send you to University all expenses paid.

Maybe you'll learn what socialism actually is while you're there.

Disregard everyone else OP, the real answer is because so far he's had the best shot at opening peoples eyes to political ideas that are more third party/fringe-oriented, which only bodes well for libertarians in the future if the trend continues.

Because freedom equality.

Libertarians dont support him. A big part of libertarianism is getting the government to get the fuck out of your life and business. Bernie is the total opposite of that.

Stop trying to shill for Bernie OP. No one here is going to vote for him cause they think libertarians like him.

>my super special brand of socialism

Okay kiddo. Better donate your last $20 to Bernie.

Libertarians hate him. He is the antithesis of their ideals. He wants MORE MORE MORE government. Libertarians want LESS. IT is the hardcore, insane, useless liberals who love him.

Yeah and his dad is the based libertarian.

When was the last time Bernie mentioned government ownership of the means of production, user? I'm not saying I agree with that either, but at least know what words mean before you use them. Government programs =/= socialism.

>bernie sanders
>not a kike communist

literally die, shill

Yes keep resisting brah hold out as long as you can. Lots liberty bros are turning to sanders and trump, don't fall 4 it haha

Teabaggers do not like statists like bernie. Nice try

Government programs are by definition Socialist you fucking retard. How old are you?

They're just jumping on the next "honest old man who if the country just listened to, everything would be OK." candidate.

Seriously, same Ron Paul fags on my fb are Bernie fags now.

Im a libertarian and I would rather shoot myself than live in a country ruled by Bernie fucking Sanders.

Probably because they have fewer biases and actually researched what his positions are instead of parroting "communist jew".

not entirely, but nice try. age doesn't matter when kids as young as 13 can grasp concepts most 35+year olds can't get

Which definition of socialism are you going by? Which literature are you drawing your frame of reference from? Do you protest having a standing army because of EVIL GUBMINT SOSHULIZM!!!???? Stop being retarded and educate yourself.

>not entirely

Explain. The entire point of socialism is government control of social aspects, which are money, housing, etc. how are programs by the government such as Section 8, welfare, subsidies, etc, NOT entirely socialist?

Let me guess, your arbitrary definition of socialism isn't the same as actual socialism.

remove yourself from the gene pool.

Half magyar, quarter east german.

I've had my run ins with socialism and if you're calling government programs socialism you're actually retarded.

>all expenses paid

>military is socialist

If you're going to act stupid, at least have an actual argument for your stupidity.

They are socialism, Ahmed.

>Why do Libertarians love him so much?
We don't.

You said government programs are by definition socialism. What do you call the military then? Or are you under some autistic impression that it's a private enterprise or something and not operated by our government using our tax dollars?

Can't use the word "free" on Sup Forums or else the grammar police come out in force.

Since when is the military a "government program"? It's an essential part of any successful country. Are roads also socialist because you're taxed on them? Do you really think that taxes are socialist?

>Taking away 50% of what you generate to distribute it is not, in practice, control of the means of production
>Generating dependent masses is not how socialism establishes itself with the help of democracy

Probably because neither is true, my memeing friend.

I literally tell you my heritage in my post and your best comeback is "but they are" and calling me Ahmed.

You argue like a 5 year old

they don't

No I don't think that, but it's consistent with your line of thinking.

And you HAVE no argument. Your heritage doesn't prove that my statements are wrong. Not all socialism operates at the same level. Socialism is a concept of practices, not a single state of being.

Typical supporter

imgur.com/RtVPQWy

How?

because liberals are calling themselves libertarians these days

I think you're talking about John McAfee user

He is going to give you much wealth from the colonies. He's going to need a lot of armies to make this happen.

might wanna read up on history friend

specifically around the french revolution

Bernie Sanders rally livestream

youtube.com/watch?v=3mq5hrUDoYo

What makes one government-provided service or benefit socialism over another to you if that's not the case? It sounds like you're the one with an arbitrary definition of socialism here.

Consider that socialism is government control of social aspects. This focus is production, money via wealth distribution, and subsidies.

So take the military. In what way is it socialist? It is a staple of defense, all countries have one in one way or another, as it is a benefit to the country. It is not, however, a social program.

Now take welfare. It is the distribution of wealth via taxes that is given to the poor. In general, this benefits no one but the recipient, while giving no return to the quality of the country.

Likewise, road taxes for example, are not socialist either. These taxes do not distribute wealth, but rather serve as a way for all people to benefit, while not strictly taking from those with to give to host without.

>Since when is the military a "government program"?

How is it not?

>run by the government
>paid for with tax dollars
>provides a service for the country

Because it's neither a social aspect not a "program". It is a job that is required for a country.

>the things i like are perfectly fine but everything else is wrong
fuck off, nigger.

You're still not providing a sound basis for why your definition of socialism is correct and everyone else's isn't, autist, you're just making this up as you go along.

>Because it's neither a social aspect
Why does this somehow preclude it from being a government program.

>not a program
Having a military falls under the definition of "defense program" easily.

>It is a job that is required for a country.
I don't see how this precludes it being a government program.

You're playing funny semantic games if you're going to argue that the military isn't a government program.

Because he wants to destroy the establishment and the banks.

That would be a huge improvement to libertarians even if he is for big government in other non essential areas.

>the things i like are perfectly fine but everything else is wrong

to be fair, thats 98% of how Sup Forums operates

Not an argument.

The military isn't a government program, it is one of the few requirements of government.

because gary johnson is just a slightly more pro gun version of sanders

>grammar Nazis
Its not about grammar
Its about being completely false

>DUDE WEED LMAO
Honestly though, he's a classic liberal, which is, quite ironically i might add, unfathomably rare US politics. Classic liberals and Libertarians get along like bread and butter

All the real libertarians have woken up to race and are now fascists. What is left over are left-libertarians, people who don't oppose the state because it violates the non-aggression principle, but because it very sparsely impedes their degeneracy. This is why these "libertarians" are fine with his platform of rent seeking.

dont even try

Sup Forums doesnt even understand the difference between classical liberalism and liberals (leftists) in the us

nor do they understand the difference between libertarianism and anarchism

according to this thread they dont even understand the difference between libers (leftists) in the us and libertarianism

not so many smart people on this board

>Not an argument.
Neither is literally anything you've said, considering you can't back up your claims with anything besides I'M RIGHT YOU'RE WRONG LISTEN TO ME DUMMIES.

I'm not sure you know what morality is

Still not an argument, bernbot

>major candidates

google.com/#q=define socialism

Weather a country needs the program or not is not the issue. The taxpayers pay for it. It is run by the government. It is a program within the government. You said any government program is socialist. Therefore
>military=socialist program
At least in your line of thinking. I, on the otherhand am not fucking retarted and understand not every government program is socialist

Because they are the party of cucks. Their VP pick passed the AWB in his state. And Johnson is similarly anti gun.

friendly reminder that without agreeing on definitions, there can be no argument that doesnt boil down to
>nuh uh
>ya huh
>nuh uh

Explain how it's a social program. You haven't stated how it is one.

Being run by the government and taxes to it doesn't make it a program. See roads.

>implying I'm a bernout
Now you're just resorting to insults because you can't back up anything you're saying with an accepted definition of the word socialism.
See: and promptly suck my dick.

please explain what social programs have to do with socialism. do you know the what socialism is, son?

You're not answering my question, buddy.

You have not mentioned social programs until now. The military is not a social program. Its a government program. There is a difference. You said all government programs are socialist. If the military is a government program, therefore you think its socialist. If you were to say all social programs are socialist, there would be no problem. I just think your initial statement is wrong.

I already defined the difference earlier in the thread. Are you not reading my posts?

>that cartoon

it's amazing how conservative the writers for GTA are, saw an article somewhere that said the US-based team is mostly made up of politically conservative people

Liberals would plead for human rights for digital characters.

then again, if you actually watch the full playlist for that "channel" in game, it's more of a parody of US politics in general, DESU and the whole game hits at US lifestyle choices as a whole

.....fuck i just love the game series so god damn much,

>Republican Space Marines

not a libertarian, conservative here but god forbid i laugh at parodies every so often

if you can't laugh at yourself every so often then you aren't human, and have no humor

I think this is just a misunderstanding of definition. You say government programs are things like welfare, and i call them social programs. I call the military a government program, and you call it "something any good country has". I dont think anyone here thinks the military is a socialistic program. If they do they are just b8.

All the good libertarians were absorbed by the GOP or returned to being non-voters.
No self respecting libertarian should give this kike a single vote.

Among myself and my Libertarian friends, not a single one of us likes him.

I'm not your buddy, guy.