Her performance in this is terrible

Her performance in this is terrible.

>Her performance in everything is terrible.

Don't worry no charge for you.

post more celebs in scarves

Obviously, only plebs think she is a good actor

Well Watson is one if the worst actresses in the biz so its not surprising

>user finally figures out EW is a shit actress

So is Sophie Turner and Daisy Ridley fyi. Couldn't act themselves out of a paper bag.

Now somebody can post the last and worst Emma.

it's the risk you take with having to cast children to star in something that's going to run for years.

She has been terrible in everythings shes done
I mean have you seen the bling ring? even fucking taissa farmiga out acts her

I found her to be almost unbearable in the movies. She's a smug know it all bitch in the books too but atleast there they go out of there way to show she can be wrong ocasionally. In the movies she's right all the time and is never shown in the wrong.

...

Considering her beauty and how little those movies depended on performances, I think they hit the jackpot. Her character is a smug bitch and that perfectly matches what she grew up to be.

She wasnt acting, she was just being herself.

all of the trio was shit at acting

WATCH IT HARRY!

Fucking slut

*braaaaapppp*

...

I agree, only fanboys would defend her poor acting

potter is ok

these shoes better be brand new
who does that jesus

...

grab 'em by the pussy

post the webm where Ron hallucinates being cuckolded

From the angle, doesn't is look like her hand is just in front of her crotch, but not actually on it?

Her left thumb looks like a nipple

yeah she can't act to save her life

>all that greenscreen

fucking movies are dead

Rupert's good. His performance in this is actually quite solid. Particularly the scene in the tent.

>all that greenscreen
This didn't bother me when I saw the scene, (assuming I have the right one in mind), so I don't see the problem.

>Has a ton of small, emotional moments with Harry through the whole series
>Ends up with Ronigger

Stahp

From all perspectives his arm is shopped and clips into her leg.

Blame Rowling

It was very obvious that Harry and Hermione should have married but no, Rowling was obsessed with Harry and Ginny being a couple.

Rowling even admitted that Harry X Hermione should have been canon.

kek, just noticed that.

I'm not interested in her for her acting

Same. I found her distractedly pretty in the Bling Ring.

THICC

>Blame Rowling
No, blame the screenplay writers. The books made it very clear that Harry much preferred to hang out with Ron than Hermione, and before Ginny the only person he had any romantic interest in was Cho.

Yep, no coincidence that she is in one the dullest franchises in the history of movie franchises. Seriously each episode following the girl witch and her orbiters from Hogwarts Academy as they fight assorted villains has been indistinguishable from the others. Aside from the gloomy imagery, the series’ only consistency has been its lack of excitement and ineffective use of special effects, all to make magic unmagical, to make action seem inert.

Perhaps the die was cast when Rowling vetoed the idea of Spielberg directing the series; she made sure the series would never be mistaken for a work of art that meant anything to anybody?just ridiculously profitable cross-promotion for her books. The Harry Potter series might be anti-Christian (or not), but it’s certainly the anti-James Bond series in its refusal of wonder, beauty and excitement. No one wants to face that fact. Now, thankfully, they no longer have to.

>a-at least the books were good though
"No!"
The writing is dreadful; the book was terrible. As I read, I noticed that every time a character went for a walk, the author wrote instead that the character "stretched his legs."

I began marking on the back of an envelope every time that phrase was repeated. I stopped only after I had marked the envelope several dozen times. I was incredulous. Rowling's mind is so governed by cliches and dead metaphors that she has no other style of writing. Later I read a lavish, loving review of Harry Potter by the same Stephen King. He wrote something to the effect of, "If these kids are reading Harry Potter at 11 or 12, then when they get older they will go on to read Stephen King." And he was quite right. He was not being ironic. When you read "Harry Potter" you are, in fact, trained to read Stephen King.

why was ginny so ugly in the movie though? It ruins immersion when he stays with her instead of prime asian pussy.

No it was very good autists have no business talking about acting. Emma stone she cant fucking act.

rupert and emma carried the entire series. only time her acting could be considered bad is in some parts of goblet of fire but everyone is acting badly in that, dumbledore is yelling and barty crouch jr is licking himself.

Yea armchair neets know about acting. She was great in azakaban and the latter ones. Cuaron even picked her to be the girl in Children of Men but she couldn't do it. You armchair neets know shit about acting you idiolize mew and shit

That's before action and the final cut looked fine. read it only took them 4-5 takes and not twenty.

>all these idiots
Her performance and crying made Helena Bohnam carter get concerned and ask if she was alright because she was being so believeable. They had to edit down the scene a lot to keep the rating even.

>the autistic emmafag spaz is here
TIME
FOR
BROKEN
ENGLISH

>no Dickinson
>no Ibsen
>no T.Williams
>no Hamsun
>no Melville
>no Tolstoj
>no Proust
into the trash it goes

you replied to pasta senpai

No shit

I know, but some people might take him seriously

>implying this wasnt a made up story by thier PRs

>feminazi
>good at crying and being victim
makes you think, huh?

>says the same guy who conviently thinks the pr for dude weed crazy movie was real
>implying anyone here even knew about it
shiggy

>As I read, I noticed that every time a character went for a walk, the author wrote instead that the character "stretched his legs."
every time

Someone did already.

>Gone with the Wind isn't even in any of them
Shit tastes

Emma was good. Even Rupert acted badly somtimes. They were the best.

I was actually implying that Emily Jean "Emma" Stone was the "worst Emma," who has not been posted until now. Glad I cleared that up.

they casted her before they knew her importance

donald probably will
watson is a well known escort for russian billionaires

>emily stone
Eww thats nasty. Worst emma. Not even an Emma.

...

kek this