Away goal rule needs to be abolished

Away goal rule needs to be abolished

Other urls found in this thread:

fourfourtwo.com/features/should-away-goals-rule-be-scrapped-fourfourtwo-investigates
bleacherreport.com/articles/2187739-5-reasons-why-uefas-away-goals-rule-should-be-scrapped
theguardian.com/football/2015/mar/19/arsene-wenger-away-goals-scrapped-champions-league
twitter.com/NSFWRedditGif

They lost 3 fucking 0 tho

They would've still lost you cuck.

Madrids goal completely killed the game tho

u need to be abolished

>4-2 agg.

I abolished your mum last night with my dick

they shouldnt have conceded then
cant lose 3-0 in the first leg and expect to still be in the game if you concede again in the second

This.

They lost 4-2 are you literally retarded?

You'll still lose anyways you fucking faggot.

Patéticos always crying for everything, grow up fucking manchildren.

>pressure the shit out of madrid in the first 15 minutes, leading to a goal and a penalty
>sit back because DUDE COUNTER ATTACKS LMAO
>concede because you were too deep
>a-away goals should be abolished!!!1
>tfw too intelligent

reminder that greaseman did 2 touches on that penalty and should've resulted in a free kick for RM

>4 - 2
>AYYY El BritanicANO

But what the faggot OP is saying is the one away goal kills the spirit of the losing team. You feel like youre now 2 goals down. Are you all literally spastic?

it still needs to be fucking abolished

along with injury time. stop the fucking clock when ball is out of play. reduce overall game time to 60 minutes to compensate

retroactively punish diving like the MLS does

video fucking referees

how fucking hard can it be ffs

...

then they should have scored in the away leg, but they didn't they parked the bus.

...

At 2-0 today, AM still had a chance. Another goal takes it to extra time.
At 2-1 they need 3 goals to progress to the final.

The away goal ruling is retarded in the modern game.

They still would have lost if Riyadh Madrid hadn't scored today.

there is no away rule my freind its just an aggregate, so fuck off cunt

They need to replace away goals with total goals. And if it's a tie, it's who reaches the total the fastest. So a 4-0 game in the first leg that becomes 4-4 still goes to the other team.

it's literally just adding goals together, do you have a bad experience with math u mong?

>it's a fat nigger thinking he understands football and gets it wrong episode

maybe they should've scored a goal at the bernabeu?

Well durrrr

ew

Then you shouldn't have gave up 3 goals in the 1st game

>mfw MLS saves this semen slurping sport with video review and dive punishments

The rule is only applied if there is a tie you retards
An away goal doesn't automatically mean 2 goals.

It's a two-legged tie, you fucking ape.

*chokes*

No shit and they have up 4 total goals and only scored 2. The players know how important the away goal is and they failed to get one and deserved to lose

hate this shit. It ruined Mls playoffs

I have a solution: since "fans" in the CL are actually just customers and spectators, play every match at neutral ground.

1/8th Final: best-of-3 series
1/4th & semi-Final: best-of-5 series
Final: best-of-7 series

>Would you support abolishing the away goal rule ?

you must be the same retard who cried 'muh offside' after Real raped Bayern 6-3

sad.

Ok.
They still lost by two goals.

>muh flow
>muh tradition

>Make it extra superficial and totally controlled like the NFL so that you kill the soul and essence of the game by having referees stop the fucking game every time there's a foul or offside so that they watch the repetition.

Controversial calls are part of football. If you want linear shit like the NFL then go watch the NFL. Get fucked, nazi.

Man Im happy we destroyed those pathetic, whiny cunts, but we really need to win La Liga, thats what matters to me.

Losing against fucking Gigi would be less painful with our first La Liga since the glorious Mou days

The away goal rule is so that the away team doesn't just defend. It is an incentive for them to attack as well as an effective rule to break ties without having to to go extra time or penalties.

Scoring an away goal is an achievement. Can you imagine having to play well when 80,000 assholes are yelling and cursing at you?

They could've scored in the first game. After blowing it so bad, Atletico simply didn't deserve it over two ties.

Yes, but that's not the fucking argument is it?

My biggest gripe is how the group stage only matters for the 1/8 Finals, it's bullshit, you spend the entire fall playing six game only to have home advantage in one round. Something should be done about it.

T
H
I
S
>patetico play defensive all first leg
>whine when Real doesn't do the same at the Cuckderon

lol

90% of the world does not want another NFL.

Exactly.

The argument doesn't exist. Both team have the same fucking chance. Away goals make it more entertaining and help prevent dragging the shit out.

>The argument doesn't exist
Of course it does, you dumb bastard. We wouldn't be here if it didn't.


>Away goals make it more entertaining
But it doesn't at all. A goal scored should be equal to a goal scored regardless of whether you're home or away.

>We wouldn't be here if it didn't.
>because 4chains wouldn't discuss anything you threw at it

>A goal scored should be equal to a goal scored regardless of whether you're home or away.
So where is the excitement of scoring an away goal and having a pretty good position despite losing? Then getting scored against you and having to navigate between trying to score and not concede because the next away goal might kill you.

Besides, do you honestly want more extra time? Or purely 50-50 shit like penalties?

its no use whining about the rules after the game is done, if atletico had scored a goal away they coulve been in front after 20 minutes when it was 2-0 but they didnt, both teams knew the rules both knew how important away goals are, atletico got btfo deal with it

The away goal rule is something regularly debated on here, newfag

>So where is the excitement of scoring an away goal
Yes, because scoring goals is never exciting, right?

Fucking pathetic autistic Kraut dickhead.

A 3-1 gets a lot more meaningful with an away goal and can save a dead rubber.

fucking this, even an american knows more about football than a britbong

yea someone's favourite team is bound to lose on away goals

Do you actually know what a dead rubber is?

What sort of response is this you third world nigger?

>this SEETHING paki itt
away goal rule is fine, they knew they had a very difficult task ahead of them when they allowed themselves to lose 3-0 in the first game
you can fuck up once in the knockouts, not twice, they knew if they took another one in it was over and that's exactly what happened
every team is aware of the away goal rule in advance and knows they can't afford to not score away
and this comes from an atletico sympathiser

Atletico lost even with the away goals rule but you can't even lose your virginity. Yeah, i'm talking to you. What, you gonna cry now?

Take this game. After losing 3-0, it was obvious that Real was going to win and playing the game was a waste of time. If Atletico had scored in the first game, they would probably go through.

It's a debate not just about tonight's game, but the away goal ruling as it is. You've added nothing to this debate and just repeated the same crap that has been posted ITT numerous times.

>If Atletico had scored in the first game, they would probably go through
Absolutely no guarantees of that at all.

>pakis
>on non-cricket Sup Forums threads

fourfourtwo.com/features/should-away-goals-rule-be-scrapped-fourfourtwo-investigates

bleacherreport.com/articles/2187739-5-reasons-why-uefas-away-goals-rule-should-be-scrapped

theguardian.com/football/2015/mar/19/arsene-wenger-away-goals-scrapped-champions-league

Obviously not, hence I said "probably". It's very likely that there would be a game worth playing while after 3-0 it's a funeral where the corpse made some noises at start.