Libertarian thread

Why is it the most logical political ideology?

Other urls found in this thread:

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Meritocracy
bleedingheartlibertarians.com/2015/06/here-we-go-again/
twitter.com/SFWRedditImages

>implying I want to talk politics with my friends

if by logical you mean totally not taking into human nature, then yes.

It is definitely the autistic political stance

If by platitude you mean not an argument then yes that's what your post wss

>talk politics with my friends

It might be the most noble ideology but it is not logical and is just as impossible to implement as pure communism

>Austistic political stance
>Literally requires abstract thinking (something autists lack of) in order to understand it

except you know, the US up until like 80 years ago

>if by logical you mean totally not taking into human nature
Communism is the best system on paper not accounting for human nature

Accounting for human nature id argue its monarchy.

What if I say to you, that we have modern, beautiful, and correct form of monarchy ?

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Meritocracy

Wow. Libertarianism I.e. free market accounts solely for human nature, as it's the only unpredictable denominator. And it should be set in an unrelated environment because the alternative leads to failure

>The US did not have roads until 1936

> roads XD
Yes the heart of libertarianism is a lack of any kind of government. Oh wait that sounds like anarchy. But you're too dense to know what two different ideologies are

>mfw i live in a socialist cuck stat

Is there room in the USA? I want to move away before its to late

Sorry "unregulated environment"

There's been a major schism, so it depends what you mean by libertarian, OP.

I thought Steven Horwitz was logical. He was a very knowledgeable and effective communicator, when it came to economic theory, until he went all Jewish infiltrator with his strategy recommendations for the libertarian movement.

bleedingheartlibertarians.com/2015/06/here-we-go-again/

There are many of these pseudo-intellectual cucks within the libertarian who don't operate according to reason. They are more interested arguing who is more pure. In fact, their support for open-borders and free labour mobility rests on the premise that everyone, including primitive migrants hordes, will adopt their values in the short-run under the right institutional framework. Libertarians can be horribly naive, especially those who refuse to make generalizations.

I appreciate the Libertarian ideology as it pretty much boils down to "Live and let live"

Truly the copout of political stances

When a group of extrovert liberals ask an introvert and socially autistic conservative about his personal political views, he'll say "libertarian"

The meme of political ideologies

This is what angers me about this argument of semantics. Libertarianism in its essence is basically just the ideals of a true constitutional republican. However these ideologies have become so skewed from their original meaning, to where now a libertarian is viewed as an unapologetic anarchist. The constitution itself was simply a grant for central authority. Libertarianism seeks to abide by the bare minimum of central government. There's almost no debate here

Damn Nigel, that was the most intuitive insight on the ideology I've ever witnessed. Congrats

I think the issue with the Libertarian party is that they insist on removing government entirely, even when the alternative (collective bargaining leading to more efficient urban planning and such) is better. There's no reason a person can't have the
>"Live and let live"
attitude while also acknowledging that unchecked immigration is bad. While I mostly agree with libertarian views I feel it's also mostly because the government has become so bloated

>if you don't promote racial hatred, world war and blame the jews for everything, you're a copout!
>you don't want to give your money so a group of corrupt people with personal agendas can spend it as they please, what a copout!

the typical Sup Forums-retard, ladies and gentlemen

The sad thing is the authoritarian right will actually attempt to understand the authoritarian left, but when it comes to abolishing moralist-style implementation, both economically and socially, they won't even give it a second thought

Libertarianism is a perfectly good ideology, assuming it's not the retarded kind that supports open borders and unchecked immigration. You can't have a libertarian society that isn't a complete shithole if you have that going on.

The "Libertarian" Party, on the other hand, is a fucking joke

>Extrovert liberals

These people would literally die or become productive in a libertarian country, their degenerate decisions and isolated lifestyle is supported by the net of the state.

Tell me again how libertarians are the autists here, when libertarians actually want social interaction to be necessary in order to thrive.

Exactly. If we're going to have taxes, then closed borders is necessary. I still don't understand why done tarians believe in this. Taxation is not theft as long as we have representation. When did people abandon pragmatism

And the republicans that supposedly hate people that live off of welfare for some reason have a problem with getting rid of dem programs and forcing people to contribute to society: a level of incomprehensible retardation equitable to sjw-tier libs

I thought that the libertarian stance is that borders are open but there's no welfare/benefits so immigrants must be productive

It warms my heart to see people of different countries daring to limit their government along with myself. I hope this ideology can gain more popularity. Also, I hope y'all liked my meme.

That's part of it. But with any taxation, legal immigration must be enforced

Reminder that open borders are fine if there is no welfare

Reminder that open borders are even more fine if everything is private property

Here we don't even have a official Libertarian party. Only a small one that don't do shit

>this_is_the_future_you_chose.jpg

>Why is it the most logical political ideology?
Fascism
Or at least some form of meritocracy

Capitalism is the purist form of meritocracy. Fascism being almost the opposite. So I don't get what you're getting at