So ingenious that literally every continuity error is intentional a touch of his mastery

>so ingenious that literally every continuity error is intentional a touch of his mastery

Who started this meme?

Other urls found in this thread:

imdb.com/title/tt0081505/goofs?mode=desktop&ref_=m_ft_dsk
imdb.com/title/tt0072684/trivia?tab=gf&ref_=tt_trv_gf
youtube.com/watch?v=cU8617YZ2YE
youtube.com/watch?v=0sUIxXCCFWw
twitter.com/NSFWRedditVideo

Elaborate, please.

>People seem to individually justify every hint of incompetence from the films of Stanley Kubrick as absolutely intentional and important in the overall viewing experience.

Room 237

Stupid conspiracy theorists

Reminds me of that thread about the Shining were people would point out random objects laying on the floor, and praise them as Stanley's genius. It's like concentrated autism.

Give examples from at least 2 of his movies and then I will respond

give a few examples

hehe /lit/ are back and they are pissed

name six (8) movie

imdb.com/title/tt0081505/goofs?mode=desktop&ref_=m_ft_dsk

imdb.com/title/tt0072684/trivia?tab=gf&ref_=tt_trv_gf

youtube.com/watch?v=cU8617YZ2YE
Continuity errors in the level of the water proves that Alex was faking the effects of the Ludovico technique

>five to six months

Clearly, one of Kubrick's subtle attempts at establishing the supernatural effects of the hotel through a time bridge. Quite brilliant really.

you mean the theory that those objects are moved purposely to unsettle the viewers subconscious?
its an interesting idea that the spatial arrangement can change subtly and how this could infer ghosts poltergeists etc.

duh but why would kubrick want to fuck with our subconscious by the means of imagery in a cinematic medium about the supernatural? XDD

read above.

>(((subtlety)))
>(((convenience)))

why do /lit/ hate kubrick so much?

That Shining doc covers all sorts of conspiracy theories, only some of which arise from continuity errors. I'm not sure this is actually a meme like OP alleges

...

>The Narrator says: "It would require a great philosopher and historian to explain the causes of the famous Seven Years' War." Actually, the reasons for the Seven Years' War are quite clear and well known. Prussia had invaded a rich Austrian region 16 years before, which Austria wanted to reconquer with its allies. Meanwhile, Britain and France were fighting for almost a century (with some relative peaceful years) over worldwide colonies. Stanley Kubrick probably wanted to make a statement about the uselessness of war.

i hope whoever wrote this got bullied mercilessly in school and has deep psychic scars all the way to their deathbed

most of that room 237 is utter bollocks. the so-called continuity errors theory though? its interesting, especially considering the medium and the narrative of the shining.

back to /lit/

>psychic scars

The Shining does have intentional continuity errors the Hotel is "Spatial Impossibilities" and people who were associated with the project say Kubrick wanted it like that.
youtube.com/watch?v=0sUIxXCCFWw

Good thing Stanley died before Room 237. I can't imagine him liking the level of analysis that some of those people went into.

He'd probably have a laugh about that one nut who thought Stanley put his face in the sky.

"Ascher speculates that Kubrick may have been having some fun, teasing his audience, though he concedes that some of the cuts may just be mistakes. He is particularly intrigued by the hotel carpet that reverses its pattern from one shot to the next. "That's the trickiest one, because it means moving the camera's orientation from one end of the set to the other. That's a huge operation. It implies real intentionality."

"It's definitely there"

He was Jewish.

>its a visual medium
>master storytellers obsessed with their craft
>lol theres no way "continuity errors" could be used to further heighten the story tho
>cmon guys nobodies perfect
>not even obsessive compulsive super mega autists

the thing I hate about Room 237 is its a bunch of people giving you part of their hot take on the film. They utter shit like "I'll just tell you part of my theory" or "I'll only give you one clue"

I'd rather they go on one in depth analysis rather than a disjointed bunch of BS

It's funny to laugh at the people in Room 237, I honestly don't know if the movie is for or against them though, I wonder if the director believes what's involved in it

*baby cries*

why does a clockwork orange feel so modern compared to other films from that same year?

The problem is one of the main people they interview (The guy who hates Barry Lyndon) is trying to shill his stupid books. They shouldn't even talked to him because he'd never reveal anything without wanting to be paid for it

The majority of "mistakes" in The Shining was done on purpose for storytelling/atmosphere purposes. I repeat, the MAJORITY, not all (remember the helicopter shadow, or Danny's sandwich, etc). I don't know about other movies, though, because I simply don't give a shit about such things, I focus, you know, on WATCHING AND ENJOYING A FILM INSTEAD OF SEARCHING FOR ERRORS LIKE A FUCKING ASS-MUNCHING FAGGOT!!!!!!!!!!!!!

theres no proof thats its intentional though because kubrick never clarified that it was

>kubrick never clarified that it was

His brother-in-law kind of did. And pls point me to where exactly did Kubrick ever clarify/explain stuff he did in his films?

Hes no better than Speilberg

he never did, so that supports what Im saying. We dont know so people on the internet just have to guess what the fuck the Shining is about

>brother-in-law kind of did

Conveniently leaving out that part.