why is technology so stagnant and even regressive?
we are still using pretty much the same tech available 100 years ago, with minor improvements, no great leaps or bounds.
robots, cars, wireless technology (cell phones, robots, ham), free energy, computers (IBM) are all 100 years old and were around in Tesla's time (in various forms).
that is the leap of evolution that was denied to us, as humans.
Other urls found in this thread:
youtube.com
youtube.com
youtube.com
en.wikipedia.org
youtu.be
youtube.com
youtube.com
evworld.com
tv.greenmedinfo.com
youtube.com
slate.com
citylab.com
en.wikipedia.org
youtube.com
themindunleashed.org
fas.org
befreetech.com
en.wikipedia.org
youtube.com
youtube.com
youtube.com
en.wikipedia.org
thefinancialphysician.com
carbuying.jalopnik.com
youtube.com
twitter.com
If it ain't broke...
>the future was in the past
pic related 1980s car
why did cars remain the same for the last few decades, when we had produced and designed futuristic cars in the 80s and 90s
>stagnant technology
>controlled and restricted advancements
this is a controlled demolition of society aka planned obsolescence/
>planned obsolescence
youtube.com
the state of tech is broke. it is causing major depletion of resources and societal breakdown, not to mention traffic and smog which leads to illness
>why is technology so stagnant and even regressive?
capitalism
>1980s car of future
The look of the car is just bunch of shaped plastic, 80's car was very different from modern cars. Different materials, almost no electronics, different fuel etc.
>fuck yeah leaded gasoline.
b-but a corporate spokesman at school told me capitalism leads to innovation. it even says so in the latest print of WSJ
Is this bait?
Because you did nothing. Because your countrymen did nothing. Because most people just bitch and whine and cry and do NOTHING to advance science and technology. So get fucked.
...
...
cars haven't remained the same, at all
it's evident you know nothing about cars or technology as a whole
protip: your skewed mid-21st century science fiction idea of "technological progress" is fucking retarded
futuristic exterior design isn't technology
...
Reppressed Evolution of Man
Human civilization and advancement has been stagnant. All our technologies have not uplifted the condition of man and we still struggle with the same problems of 100 and even 1000 years ago.
We all know that Tesla wanted to advance human civilization forward by 1000 years, with free energy harnessing the earth's electromagnetic energy and transmitting it globally through the ionospehere and other advanced technologies,
What other technologies and advancements have been repressed /suppressed to stagnate and reverse humanity?
>giant glass window that would cost thousands to replace if cracked
>wheels with zero turning ability
>no suspension, enjoy achieving liftoff when you hit a speed bump
>tires from a fucking bicycle, enjoy spinning out like mrcummy every time it drizzles
that "future car" concept is retarded
>jew against capitalism
>70s AI car
so, what do you suggest to achieve that leap?
>what is false flag
You were supposed to be leading the way shlomo.
Prefer the 1980s version, to be honest with your sheklestein senpai.
It's called material cap.
Silicon processors are almost at their max capacity now, fossil fuel is still working but it fucks up economy and it's gonna end someday, leaving us in stone age if we don't have alternatives.
Worst is that any new tech will be halted as much as possible because those who profit on old ones have power to do that.
>robot from the 30s
youtube.com
>AI from the 70s
youtube.com
>potential to change everything
The molochs that run this world would NEVER let anything happen that could " change everything "
>implying
AI is just coming out and smartphones like 7 years ago. You might think it's not occuring but that's because widespread adoption isn't picked up by the west. If i recall in China beggars are using QR codes for donations now
>Tesla builds Worldwide Wireless System (an early internet)
>The Robot Boat of Nikola Tesla: The Beginnings of the UUV and remote control weapons
we are pretty much stuck with minor adjustments to breakthroughs that occurred 100 years ago.
infact, scientists agree that pretty much all major breakthroughs occurred 100 years ago, and we are just modifying these old technology to allow efficient profit harvesting.
Even Walt Disney was aware of our abilities and developed Experimental Prototype Community of Tomorrow (EPCOT); a futuristic community that was to be built, but he was old and could not complete the project. After Disney, the company decided to just make it a theme park.
en.wikipedia.org
the reason you have the internet is b/c the US military/deep state decided to unsuppress 100 year old Tesla internet technology
it was coordinated to support their globalist agenda by americanizing the world thru the internet
I am futuristic
>alex jones is jewish
who'd have thought?
We can't advance while white people still exist.
the future is now antifuturism: gay rights, open borders, #resist, global warming, #fuckRussia
futurism and utopia is the past
mk 1 golf was the greatest gold, it was all downhill from there
but saying that tho
this was how i want the future
youtu.be
why can't we have nice things?
so you propose nothing and only bitch?
just be happy you are able to taste a strangers anus by just swiping right on grindr.
this is the future you chose.
>tfw the 80s was the zenith of futurism
>advance human civilization forward by 1000 years, with free energy harnessing
>unsuppress technology and information
>free flow of information and technology, no suppression
>advancement of humans to the galactic level is the prime interest of humanity, not capitalism/greed
>electric car
>A century ago, society could have started down the path of electric cars. We already had regenerative braking like hybrids have now, and we could have powered our cars on a decentralized system with home electricity, swap-out batteries and plug-in stations.
youtube.com
youtube.com
>investigative history into the conspiracy to stop the electric car nearly a century ago
evworld.com
tv.greenmedinfo.com
>Why are things still functional instead of following crazy made up aesthetics.
Because art moves at a different pace than tech.
>But the tech!
Automated factories are happening and cars have a metric ton of cables and computers in them.
Futurists just have an unhealthy habit of mixing what they want with what progress is.
your expectations are skewed by fiction, technology has changed as an amazing pace already
You watch sci-fi spy films and are in awe of the futuristic shit they can do. But you don't know that the governments are 30 years ahead of civilian consumer technology. You post here on your japanese imageboards preoccupied with racemixing, politics, global warming, ISIS, ukraine. But you don't understand that all of these things are just there to placate the masses. Meanwhile the government has the power to see the future of every single person and see what they're seeing through quantum entanglement genetic memory algorithms. Why do I care that the government knows what I think, you say?
Because you are the perfect slave, little things are let slide, but big things that a collective conscious plans to overthrow the government are easily overthrown due to remote viewing of their intentions by the government.
We're all living in a dream world.
i blame internet
Wincest will only be more popular.
It would be amazing seeing all the kids blowing their load over their grandmothers.
The real red pill is that technology is regressing but they are cleverly presenting it as if we are advancing, when in reality we are regressing with each year. That's why highways are falling apart and all the airplanes are super old, it's because no one remembers how to do those things anymore.
this is why "technology is a farce. It's just a goyish trick. to pacify the masses into harmless inaction and slavery to technology
With the suppressed tech we have now we've surpassed many sci-fi films already.
i'm not sure how your statement makes difference between "grandpa's hidden porn cache" and today, and how it helps to the thread
but yeh many wanks will be had. future is looking bright
>sd card is bigger than the hd of my first PC
nah, the future is now
Didn't commie factories when the Wall fell still use 1930s technology or something?
I have more storage space and computing power in my phone than older supercomputers.
If they had cell phone cameras in the 1920s...ho boy. People were always degenerate, it's just better documented now.
You seem to believe design and tech are equal, shlomo. Or that theory means practice. Or that futuristic is future, no matter if it's completely impractical.
Smartphones, AIs, 3D printing, solar panels, nanotech, brain surgery, bioparts, drones and other amazing stuff are here but you complain over the futuristic design of KITT.
functionally progressive > aesthetically progressive
stop listening to faggot artists and authors, and start listening to engineers.
They had electronics in 80s cars, that was the first decade where it was commonplace. And no, there wasn't anything outside the Third World that still used leaded gasoline in the 80s.
This is Lada x and you insulted her.
He's Russian, any cars they had in the 80s were at a 1960s level of technology at most.
>tfw we could have cars that either run on water or have insane MPGs by now but the greed of corporations will hold us back indefinitely
google the "ogle carburetor"
in NYC, you have really old, rusty, dilapidated and shitty 100 yr old subway system, but it has recently upgraded GIS system to track the trains. WOW so functionally progressive.
>any cars they had in the 80s were at a 1960s level of technology at most.
[Citation needed]
...
How off am I when I say that's carbed, drum brakes in the rear?
dont fuck w/ russian tech. they were playing tetris when you were still playing pong.
>in NYC, you have really old, rusty, dilapidated and shitty 100 yr old subway system
why yes, when we're talking about infrastructure projects that will cost billions of dollars to change and cause massive inconvenience to the city as ithey're upgraded, the situation isn't at all like cars
the iteration rate on infrastructure is inherently slower than almost any other area or engineering simply due to scope and the level of integration
I wouldn't be surprised if it has mechanical brakes and a solid rear axle with leaf springs.
???
Tetris came out a good decade after Pong.
>US cant afford to build and maintain subway systems. its too expensive for them.
b-but europe doesnt need those excuses and upgraded its train system to quasi-futurist shit, even moscow has metro 200 yrs ahead of the US (and its older too), they keep adding new lines with now excuses
same with china, japan
US is behind the world in terms of development and infrastructure.
everytime a city proposes to build a much needed subway system, it gets rejected due to Americans not being able to afford its development and maintenance. this is a popular issue of US public transportation in all cities.
cities even went for cheaper alternatives to subway like the skyrail in Vancouver, but got rejected for the same reason: Americans are too poor to afford development and maintenance of public transport that is easily available and developed in other parts of the world.
recently the US rejected high-speed rail system that Europe, China, Japan have. reason of rejection: unaffordablity
>b-but europe doesnt need those excuses
of course it doesn't, the US subsidizes military protection for almost all of Europe, outside of Ukraine and Belarus.
that is why our government has spent the last 3 years convincing NATO members to actually pay their 2% GDP dues, because currently out of the ~27 or so NATO members, only 4-5 of them are actually paying what they need to pay. the US is stuck paying 4%.
when the USA de-escalates its military commitment to Europe and goes from 4% GDP to 2%, that's 359 billion dollars unlocked per year to spend on infrastructure. and consequently that's 359 billion dollars European countries will have to make up in their own budgets, which means that their infrastructure will get shittier.
the postwar period is over, dresden isn't a pile of cinders, and there is no soviet union. eurofags can pay their fair price for defense now. unless of course they want to cultivate the appearance of parasites in the 21st century
>suppressed tech
this is the future we chose
>Battery suppression
>Large-format NiMH batteries were commercially viable and ready for mass production, but there is evidence to support that Chevron and other oil-related interests may have suppressed the technology. Presumably to forestall the introduction of battery electric vehicles and plug-in hybrids
en.wikipedia.org
>Magnet Motor
youtube.com
turbine free energy
themindunleashed.org
>Solar suppression
>patents for solar photovoltaic generators were subject to review and possible restriction if the photovoltaics were more than 20% efficient.
fas.org
>Alternative Engines
>William Bolon - from Rialto, California, developed an unusual steam engine design in 1971, that was said to get up to 50 miles to the gallon. The engine used only 17 moving parts and weighed less than 50 pounds and eliminated the usual transmission and drive train in an automatic. After much publicity, the inventors factory was fire bombed with damages totaling $600,000 . Letters to the Whitehouse were ignored so the inventor finally gave up.
befreetech.com
en.wikipedia.org
If you guys would stop making wars you wouldn't need to spend that much on your army.
Maybe we wouldn't even need protection because people wouldn't be mad at the west for just invading their country destabilizing the entire area.
the issue with archaic infrastructure is even pre-war
>In the early 1900s, General Motors' long-time president, Alfred P. Sloan, Jr., began implementing a plan to expand auto sales and maximize profits by eliminating streetcars.
>In 1922, Sloan established a special unit within GM that was charged with, among other things, the task of replacing the United States' electric railways with cars, trucks, and buses. Consumers who no longer had the option of taking the streetcar turned first to the bus lines and, eventually, to owning and driving their own automobiles.
no public transport because car companies bribed government officials in the 40s and 50s to plan cities without public transport oriented towards cars ie us suburbia
public transport was sabotaged to steer the flock towards car/oil
youtube.com
Segal
youtube.com
youtube.com
en.wikipedia.org
>In 1930 the electric streetcar ruled Chicago
with social engineering and propoganda campaigns, GM successfully wasted billions of public tax dollars.
wasted billions of public $$ to fund their monopoly.
GM transitioned to a "buy a car yearly" model and gimped every car they produced then and made mad dosh
The fuckers bought out a guy who had managed to create a 100 mpg engine back in the 80's for millions
Then they went and locked it away in some shelf and it hasn't seen the light if day since.
Shit, VW has a car that could hit 300 mpg if you drive it right and the US government outright banned them from even showing it off here
>we get government out of most of everything we'll see some real progress.
That is literally been the struggle for advancement basically since the dark ages
cars are built to be replaced every 5 years
instead of building long-lasting cars, they build shit that is guaranteed to be useless in 5 years.
it is called planned obsolescence
>Today, families tend to have more than one car and will buy a new one every four or five years
thefinancialphysician.com
carbuying.jalopnik.com
>you would start looking for a new car every 3 or 4 years
www.cnbc.com/id/49504504
>If you guys would stop making wars you wouldn't need to spend that much on your army.
why are you bothering to bring up wars of aggression when NATO is a defense pact? NATO's primary effect is deterrence, and it's not a credible deterrent unless you pay money into it. that is why we pay so much, because for a decade after the war most of Europe was bombed to shit and a handful of decades after that, you neighbored a country whose ideology was predicated on worldwide communism.
this isn't the case anymore. the only time article 5 of NATO has been invoked was after 9/11, since muslims aren't deterred by what we as rational human beings would consider suicidal activities. beyond this edge case, NATO has been dramatically successful from 1949 to 2017 because a.) Russians aren't idiots like Muslims and b.) money going into the system has been maintained.
You spend way more on your army than just the NATO amount.
If you would stop using that army to destabilize the middle-east, you could afford a decent infrastructure.
technology is literally progressing at a faster rate than ever before
>mfw this is not the future...
youtube.com
>If you would stop using that army to destabilize the middle-east
You have to go back, Ibrahim.
>You spend way more on your army than just the NATO amount.
No shit, because NATO is the sum of all its members.
When some members (let's say 23 of them, which actually doesn't include your country) don't pay their 2%, the gap has to be made up somewhere.
A defense pact is not credible when most of the members don't pay anything into the system. It's called the tragedy of the commons. We tolerated it when Europe was weak, but now the EU economy collectively is about as large as ours (before Brexit) with ~550 million people. You can afford to pay now. It's not 1949.
Public transportation has never been practical in the US because the country is too fucking big and spread out, nimrod. There are some cultural issues as well such as how cars=individuality and independence to Americans, but mainly it's practical reasons.
>why is technology so stagnant and even regressive?
Why do you ask questions which complain false assertions?