Which one's better Sup Forums?
Which one's better Sup Forums?
Other urls found in this thread:
>le pass sideways men
Rakitic
Fabregas.
>le pass backwards man
Verratti can defend and has better vision
Kros for dead balls and short passes
I'd go with Verratti, he's also younger
I'm serious guys.
I'm a fanboy for one of them but I really want to see some decent arguments, because to me they're incomparable. One is far better than the other.
Kroos and its not even close desu
They're both overrated
Drinkwater
>tf
>tp
>tf
>tp
Britain at this point is as respectable in football as New Zealand
Stick to rugby m8, England have (on paper) the best NT int he world
They also (on paper) hold the Falklands.
Joe Allen .
>on paper
On my paper it says they lost to a part time dentist
Reply to me again, you bloody sheepshagger and see what comes about
Kroos ofc, he's more experienced and Verratti is a walking red card
On paper you failed to qualify to the last Confederations Cup over Tahiti.
>Top player
>overrated manlet
Really hard choice
>south American using bestiality as an insult
Verratti is literally, in a literal way, the only talented Italian player and you hate him?
Based Dietmar bringing the bants
We lost to one on the pitch as well
You are literally, in a literal way, wrong
Is he better than Toni?
kek
Name 1 (one) player to prove me wrong, then
Toni's retired and has never been as talented as Verratti
>Belotti
>Bonucci
>Barzagli
>Chiellini
>Insigne
>Immobile
>Balotelli
>Buffon
Why tho? You'll only say he's shit and has no talent no matter what
I meant Toni Kroos cabron, the topic of the thread
Great bantz.
Why did you quote me then? I was talking about Italian players
>3 defenders and a goalkeeper
>talented
Seriously, stick to rugby
>Defender's can't be talented
>Ignoring the 4 attackers I mentioned
LOL
defenders
goalkeeper
>talented
balotelli and immobile
now youre just fukin with me nigger
See? You proved me right
So
Toni Kroos, right?
>defenders and goalkeepers can't be talented
Oh shit, didn't see the flag, nevermind
When was the last time they connected a +20 metre assist or a goal with their foot ouside the small box?
Centrebacks and goalkepers can barely be called "footballers", they are donkeys
Of course, Kroos is a proven world class player, Verratti is a kid who's only played in Ligue 1 and never went further than the quarters in ucl
>Centrebacks and goalkepers can barely be called "footballers"
Cancerous mentality
Strong argument there, you sure told me
Shitposts only get other shitposts as answer
>le defender more talented than dynamic passing midfielder
heres your (you) maria
>he doesnt know the difference between talented and more talented
Back to meheeco Pablo
>lucky long pass that goes to the opponent centreback
>the centreback misses the header without even jumping so the long ball falls into the forward
wow, he's so good! he should play as a #10!!
>rates defender as better passer than a literal midfielder
keep trying adalina
No, he shouldnt, he's talented as a defender and that's why he plays as a defender, if he was talented as a 10 he'd play as a 10
>he's talented as a defender
Oxymoron, it's like saying you are a good musician as a drummer
kroos desu
...
Who the fuck said that? Try learning english at least if you want to live in America
And that's why you never saw Silvertina winning a trophy in your life
Jokes on you, I was 6 months old when we won the last title
Kroos barely plays with the ball. A better comparison would be varrati and modric.
as a diehard Serie A fan, I agree with most but Balo isn't as talented as Veratti, if anything they're equal.
also leaving out based Donnarumma-sempai
>argento shiting on defenders and keepers
How can you be so out of touch with your own history?
Are you literally 12?
Reddit: The team
>which one is the best at passing the ball 5ft sideways
The absolute state of divegrass.
(you)
Tumblr: the country
>Balotelli
>Italian
Kroos is a better option for a team.
Verratti gets injured a lot. I don't think Kroos has missed a single game for Real since he signed with them.
They don't play the same position and Marco is younger, but as players I think are of a similar overall level I'd take the one who can play over the one who misses a bunch of games every year.
antonio cruz is the better passer but i like verratti's balls, defensive contribution, work-rate, dribbling/ball-control, cattivita', positional sense, agility, and his vision is quite good also. and im a manlet too
who would be the better investment idk. verratti's younger but kroos makes more immediate contributions to goals. if soccer had sabermetric-like stats, kroos might have a lower overall statistical value given how shitty his defending is.
I think Kroos. Gets injured less, press-proof, flawless set-pieces, perfect for controlling possession.
...
Verratti does better passes, got a better ball control and vision, he's also younger.
But he's less experimented and do mistakes in marking when playing against aggressive offenses, commit way more fouls and get stupid Yellow cards for complaining, he also hesitates too much to shoot on target, in the PK area he will try to make a pass whereas Kroos will shoot.
I will say that Verratti got way more potential than Kroos but you got to have a good coach and teach him to handle pressure be more disciplined.
Veratti > Fabregas > Kroos > Modric > Pogba
Delet pogba and fabregas, switch around all the signs, and you're good