ITT: Movies hotter than porn

ITT: Movies hotter than porn

Other urls found in this thread:

youtube.com/watch?v=RfPjC2Fbd3w
youtube.com/watch?v=CTbSCgrYOsw&feature=youtu.be
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Unsimulated_sex
theguardian.com/books/2013/jul/05/what-do-women-want-extract
twitter.com/NSFWRedditGif

It's also a fucking great movie.

"Me? I thought it was the fuck of the century."

Does anyone have a webm of the back scratching bit?

When I was 7 years old I had a woman do this to me a few times in a row while I was on the train with my mom. She even mouthed "don't tell mommy".

Weird lady.

Leon The Professional

...

The Accused (1988)

I remember a woman trying to get me in her car, I was like 12 and she was 40+

Creeps me out thinking about it.

IMAGINE

Persona, Mulholland Drive, The Lady Eve

This looks intriguing

It's good. The director made better films, but that one works in the context of this thread.

Female pedophiles are a genuine problem and the taboo around them causes a lot of unneeded suffering.

I married a woman in her 50s when I was in my early 20s for money and I still suspect her of having not just a thing for young boys but a thing for young-young boys. She talked about little boys with such ostensible hatred and sadist tendencies that she must've had some weird kink with them.

...

You think Matt Smith hot user?

why are so many losers pedos

>he wouldn't fuck 12 year old Natalie Portman

>not exclusively fucking elderly women
pleb get out

The best one could be the one with the little boy and his sister in a crook family.

How much money?

I got 40 mil from the divorce.

TDKR the plane scene

>ywn have any part of your body, much less your crotch, come as close to Eva's rack as this kid has

I'm a fan of Death by Hanging, personally.

Jesus christ.

Where is Chris hansen when you need him.

Has he ever actually lured in a female pedophile?

Persona.

That one scene made me hard as mountains, more than any other movie.

would literally pay for this

nice

inb4 the 1962 version was better. No it was not.

Persona (1966)?
looks old as fuck

Risky Business

hard dicks transcend time and space user

youtube.com/watch?v=RfPjC2Fbd3w

Bull-fucking-shit.

Post proof.

CHRIST
H
R
I
S
T

Tell me something, man to man

litteral porn.

Allegedly they got women for his new season.

Don Jon

The Girl Next Door

Don Jon was so disappointing.

You will never look this good in a v-neck

I went to high school with some guy who always (and I mean always; every day and even during PE) wore really, really deep v-necks. The thing was that he happened to have some strange skin condition on his chest. It was like someone held a blowtorch to his chest, the burns got infected, the world's most malicious insects stung him, and then he also got cancer right there. A field of nothing but red little tumors, perfectly framed by his v-necks. He also was 5'1" and a giant cunt. Apparently he thought everyone thought he was the coolest guy in school. In reality, everyone massively disliked him.

Ever since that guy I have to stop myself from bursting out in laughter whenever I see a v-neck.

What are some other movies with cuckqueans?

Stone's acting was top tier in this. I mean this completely unironical.
And Verhoeven is so underrated it's criminal.

Stone's acting in BI is unironically god tier indeed. I've only seen a little bit of the sequel and while that movie seemed to be awful, she owned it again.

The thing with Verhoeven is that almost all of his Dutch movies aged like milk (and never had much international appeal) and his American movies are low in number while often being too ironic (and even anti-American) for most blockbuster audiences.

Yeah, I would never really call Stone a good actress let alone a great one. But BI is one of her few good outings.

Is that really hot for me? I mean, is that scene hot enough to give a guy a boner?

Look up a clip of the scene with her talking. You need the dialog.

wew

It really is and she looked absolutely stunning in it.

I'm happy to read some of the comments of this thread because this is one of my fav movies. I just think its such a great thriller.

Michael Douglas is stellar. He's so over the edge the whole movie

One thing I really never got about Basic Instinct:

What does make Michael Douglas rush to save his partner, who just gets into a building and gets killed at the elevator?


My theory is that just before that scene Michael Douglas goes visit Sharon Stone and sees her new book printing and he takes a look. And if you pause you can see the page he reads sort of describes that elevator scene. Maybe it was that what made Douglas mind click and rush to save his partner?


Also who did it all? Jeanne Triplehorn or Sharon Stone?

If you pause the movie during the shot of the building (when he's looking) you can see a female figure hiding. It's really hard to spot, but it's there.

brb making screengrab

>tfw you will never be taken advantage of by pic related

Actually I just checked and it seems like I was wrong: what I always thought was a woman is just some shadows and a closet. The camera movement also hints at association with the elevator bit.

Shiiiiiiiiiiiiiiit really?


Also check.out what I told you, I think the answer is both things: he reads the printed pages then sees that figure you say amd everything clicks for him
Really great moment. Love when this kind of shit happens in s movie, when a character just realizes something out of the blue

might watch it again because of this thread

she was an absolute knock out

9 1/2 Weeks has some pretty hot scenes.

A History of Violence had some hot shit.

Maria Bello and her hairy muff, unf!

TFW you'll never have Eva sit on your face.

The Russian version is the best version

youtube.com/watch?v=CTbSCgrYOsw&feature=youtu.be

>The Dreamers

Louis and Eva are the only good thing about that shitty film.

literally fast forwarded to his scenes, ugly unable to act piece of shit

>THROUGH
goddammit

But his in like most of the movie.

Also I kind of like him in Lost river but his god awful in everything else, he was miscast so badly in this

Not even the hottest part of the movie.

>Eva's probably's enjoying it

Was that Skrillex at 0:24?

Never found Sharon Stone very attractive, but the scene where Michael Douglas borderline rapes Jeanne Triplehorn is hot af.

It's a low budget softcore porn. It's really bad.

jeanne tripplethorn fuck was hotter

Pretty Baby

>why are so many losers pedos

why are so many billionaires pedos?

And you spend your time here???

the rest of the movie sucks but this scene is hot as fuck

based 90s michael douglas

based 90s sharon stone

...

I only enjoyed Falling Down it captures the 90's atmosphere pretty well, is Basic Instinct worth checking out?

Is that Chris Evans?

>is Basic Instinct worth checking out?
only for sharon and jeanne typical sex thriller, the plot isnt important nor is it good

yes

>typical sex thriller, the plot isnt important nor is it good

Then it's a waste of time for me, I got really bored watching Nymphomaniac

Secretary
Poison Ivy 3
Parts of The Hot Spot for prime Jennifer Connelly boobs, Virginia Madsen isn't bad either

all great suggestions

>hotter than porn

Everything?

"At the heart of pornography is sexuality haunted by its own disappearance."

"Porno, by adding a dimension to the image of sex removes one from desire and disqualifies all seductive illusion."

"Sex is everywhere else to be found, but that's not what people want. What people deeply desire is a spectacle of banality. This spectacle of banality is today's true pornography and obscenity. It is the obscene spectacle of nullity (nullité), insignificance, and platitude."

"What is globalised is first of all the market, the promiscuity of exchange of anything and everything, the perpetual movement of money. Culturally speaking, this is the anything goes promiscuity of the signifier and of values; in other words, pornography. The endless stream flooding the net with anything and everything, this is pornography. No need for sexual indecency, the simple existence of this interactive copulation is all it takes. At the end of this process, there is no longer any difference between the global and the universal. The universal is itself globalised, democracy, human rights circulate in exactly the same way, through exactly the same channels as any global product: like oil or capital."

"From the discourse of labour to the discourse of sex... one finds the same ultimatum, that of production in the literal sense of the term. ...To produce is to materialize by force what belongs to another order, that of the secret and of seduction. Seduction is, at all times and all places, opposed to production. Seduction removes something from the order of the visible, while production constructs everything in full view... Everything is to be produced, everything is to be legible, everything is to become real, visible, accountable... This is sex as it exists in pornography, but more generally, this is the enterprise of our culture, whose natural condition is obscene: a culture of monstration, of demonstration, of productive monstrosity."

Sex & Nudity

10/10

Rated NC-17 for explicit sexual content including violence.

This movie contains many scenes with very explicit nudity (genitals) and copulation.

Breasts, pubic hair, buttocks, vaginas, and penises (both erect and nonerect), are seen throughout the film.

A woman fondles another woman's covered breast.

A woman fondles another woman's bare crotch (not graphic).

A room full of naked sleeping people is shown, simulating the aftereffects of an orgy.

Children throw snow at a man's penis.

A woman is seen giving a man oral sex.

A man is briefly shown masturbating while looking at a woman's pubic region.

A woman masturbates a man's penis.

A wooden instrument (dildo) is thrust in and out of a woman's vagina.

An egg is inserted into a woman's vagina, buried inside.

Full frontal and rear views of a naked little boy and girl (no sexual act).

A woman pulls a little boy's penis to inflict pain.

A woman appears to insert a man's penis into her vagina.

A man and woman have unsimulated sex.

A woman is seen riding a man on top with the woman lifting high enough each time you can see penile penetration.


pure kino

...

>quoting sexual psychology book on tv
people just want to fap to hot girls/guys and quantity generally is more efficient than quality nowadays regarding porn

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Unsimulated_sex

I wouldn't say Verhoeven is underrated. Robocop and Total Recall are still highly regarded, even with the shitty remakes each got.

...

It's not a sexual psychology book.

Those are quotes by a dead French philosopher (who also reviewed cinema from time to time). The author of Simulacra and Simulation, a book that appears in The Matrix.

"Obscene is that which illuminates the gaze, the image and every representation. Obscenity is not confined to sexuality, because today there is a pornography of information and communication, a pornography of circuits and networks, of functions and objects in their legibility, availability, regulation, forced signification, capacity to perform, connection, polyvalence, their free expression. It is no longer the obscenity of the hidden, the repressed, the obscure, but that of the visible, all-too-visible, the more visible than visible; it is the obscenity of that which no longer contains a secret and is entirely soluble in information and communication."

"This is why in this society everything-objects, goods, services, relations of all types will be feminized, sexualized in a feminine fashion"

"Advertising, therefore, like information: destroyer of intensities, accelerator of inertia. See how all the artifices of meaning and of nonmeaning are repeated in it with lassitude...how all of that is staged exactly like sex in pornography, that is to say without any faith, with the same tired obscenity."

"porno is a hypertrophied fiction of sex consumed in its mockery, for its mockery, a collective spectacle of the inanity of sex in its baroque assumption (it was the baroque that invented this triumphal mockery of stucco, fixing the disappearance of the religious in the orgasm of statues)."

"His vision of contemporary society exhibits a careening of growth and excrescence (croissance et excroissance), expanding and excreting ever more goods, services, information, messages or demands — surpassing all rational ends and boundaries in a spiral of uncontrolled growth and replication."

Was it rape?

It also goes back to why lingerie is more sexy than nudity. Or why Sharon Stone flashing some beave is more erotic than if she had been naked the entire movie.

>Seduction removes something from the order of the visible, while production constructs everything in full view..

"Liberation, of course, like paradise, or life, is boring"

"We can only simulate orgy and liberation now, pretending to continue on in the same direction at greater speeds, but in reality, we are accelerating in empty space, because all of the ends of liberation (of production, progress, revolution) are already behind us..."

Unfortunately this, they should have played around the idea of who was the real killer, was it Stone, her Lesbian lover, Tripplethorn? It would have made for a great Whodunnit, and in a time when the AIDS epidemic was a its worst, The theme of not knowing which sexually promiscuous person was the real killer would have been great.

/thread

It's too bad she did this movie and not the original iteration of Love where she'd actually be getting plowed.

This is probably cheating, but the amount of sexual tension in this movie made me and my girlfriend go to town on each other before the movie had even finished. We had to watch it in two sittings.

Yeah. Women are turned on all by sex. Hetero, homo, lesbian, animals, bonobos, all of it.

theguardian.com/books/2013/jul/05/what-do-women-want-extract
>How to explain the conflict between what the women claimed and what their genitals said?

>As they enrolled in the study, Chivers' subjects identified themselves as straight or lesbian. They were shown images of sex between men and women, women and women, men and men, and a pair of bonobos (a species of ape). The subjects, straight and lesbian, were turned on right away by all of it, including the copulating apes. While they watched, they also held a keypad on which they rated their own feelings of arousal. So Chivers had physiological and self-reported scores. They hardly matched at all. Chivers' objective numbers, tracking what's technically called vaginal pulse amplitude, soared no matter who was on screen and regardless of what they were doing, to each other, to themselves. The keypad contradicted the plethysmograph entirely. The self-reports announced indifference to the bonobos. But that was only for starters. When the films were of women touching themselves or enmeshed with each other, the straight subjects said they were a lot less excited than their genitals declared. During the segments of gay male sex, the ratings of heterosexual women were even more muted.