This is such a good idea

This is such a good idea.

Everyone should carry a gun.

Someday some little fucker will pull out his gun, and before he can do anything someone else will pull out their gun and kill him.

But... a lot of people won't have seen that the first guy acted out, so they'll shoot the guy who shot the first shooter...

And then his friends will draw down on the people retaliating...

I mean you know, like 50 bodies later it'll cool off.

And that first guy? He won't have killed one single student.

Because everyone had a gun.

Freedom.

it's so simple

The irony of your post is that communism is so ingrained into you that you can't even conceive of the notion of people going to fucking buy them. It's got to be free hand outs.

>omg this argument is devestating
>better randomly switch topics
>uh... COMMUNISM, sure, that'll work
weak man, weak...

Do you know what a hypothetical scenario is?

...

Yes a hypothetical scenario is kind of like if you expected communism working in any situation ever.

>COMMUNISM GUYS THIS IS NOW A COMMUNISM THREAD
>oh god oh god please dont discuss the OP oh god

freedom motherfucker

>argument is weak as hell
>the one guy who responds happens to be a retard
>breathing a sigh of relief as you mock him while praying that no one not retarded responds to you

>sees his argument being mocked
>pretends to be someone else and acknowledges the weak argument
>hints there are other arguments
>unable to make them himself
>whew safe

Gun freedom is in the constitution. So kill all children.

I don't know if any sane and rational person believes it's possible to stop a shooting spree BEFORE it happens.

Giving everyone a gun would allow you to end it early, after it starts.

It's not:
>"guy pulls gun, gets shot immediately so he can't do anything"

Instead it's:
>"guy pulls gun, shoots one person, immediately gets shot himself in self defense so he can't shoot 31 others"

You just turned "mass shooting at XYZ location, 32 dead" into "armed civilian saved hundreds of lives, one fatality"

Oh you're right... we'd have to adjust the op to include at least one successful kill by the initial shooter...

before the rest of the shitstorm inevitably came down...

and bullied teens typically killed 1 person before dying themselves, but it happened DAILY instead of just every other week...

You're right you're right thanks for the sanity check with the above adjustments I think we've got it.

This said, I guess I'll take the bait and make a comment on the "comyunizm, gaiz" stuff

Any law should be written under the assumption that the worst possible scenario will come to pass as a result. Let's ignore guns for a bit, since that's a hot button issue. Consider the following law:

>"If a person is starving, you MUST supply them with free food"

Sounds altruistic, right? But how do we measure if someone is starving? Couldn't someone just lie to get infinite free food? Worse yet: what if some sadistic father refused to feed his child, forcing his child to starve as a means of getting free food for himself and the rest of the family?

You could say "that'll PROBABLY not happen", but it's a better idea to just rewrite the law to prevent it:

>"If a person is medically diagnosed as malnourished by a licensed physician then the medical facility must provide food directly to the individual who is malnourished" (or something like that)

The same is true of gun laws. Sure the government PROBABLY won't use their guns to enslave the population and silence any political dissent, but it's better save than sorry. Maybe for the next 200 years the government will consists of 100% benevolent and trustworthy people, but if EVEN ONCE a dictator slips their way into the seat of the presidency, we don't want laws on the books that prevent us from protecting ourselves.

If bullied teens aren't CURRENTLY going on killing sprees daily, what evidence do you have that arming civilians would cause it to become a routine / daily occurrence?

That said, why not just put a "high school graduation" stipulation on gun ownership? That's a lot more reasonable than "ban all guns forever OMG guns are scary"

this retarded

Hypothetical: Guy goes in to rob grocery store, unaware to him 7 people have already drawn their respective weapons and safety's are off, if I was the robber I'd cut my losses and run, but are you legally able to shoot someone that has second thoughts?

this retarded

as weak as you being here?

so retarded

this retarded

this retarded

Kids are thieves, if I was 16 and really wanted one, I'd locate and steal it, just like a car or knife or just going into Walmart and buying chemicals like isopropyl alcohol and bleach, literally 4$ of chemical can kill 600+ people, stfu about n control and protect yourself, don't count on someone comming to save you, you need to fend for yourself.

Come and get them anytime communist faggot. Oh wait, you’ll send men with guns to do it for you. Newsflash, men who carry guns for a living don’t agree with trans cuck rights faggot world view, so go prep a refugee and finger your asshole while real men rule this world how we see fit.

>This

Here's something many people afraid of guns fail to understand about them.

EVERY law in this country, without exception, is enforced at gunpoint. Just because there isn't a police office standing next to you with a physical gun pointed at your head, it's the fear of guns that prevents you from breaking any laws.

>You don't get shot for shoplifting
Oh? What DOES happen if you shoplift? You go to court, and spend a night in jail? What if you just... don't want to do that? Why spend the night in jail when you can say "fuck you" and go home, instead? The cops will restrain you. What if you fight back? What if you just run really fast? You won't win, because they have tasers and guns.

If the government didn't have guns, they'd have no way to keep people inside of prisons. Nothing would stop you from just walking out the front door and giving a big "fuck you" to the guard at the entrance. So at the end of the day, every citizen is already being held at gunpoint.

Now let's make this a bit scarier for you. "Government" isn't a law of nature, a force of physics, or a divine implementation. It's just a bunch of humans who decided to get together and come up with rules for living together, and once enough of them got together they had numbers on their side and could use force (guns) to cause others to live the way they do. You shouldn't think of "government" as this higher entity that's beyond your comprehension or scale of reasoning. It's just people.

So if those people can have guns, and point them at you to force you to obey sometimes arbitrary rules,... then why can't you have a gun?

Found the small dick complex guy

You just cut and pasted this same retarded comment from another active thread you autistic nigger cunt.

>
stay mad kid

This world was built on conquering and commanding forces, we take land to benefit our country, why can't America/Canada just ban together and realize there's nothing wrong with guns, it's the fact that everyone thinks we're safe even though everywhere around the world there are bombing and shelling that we desensitize ourselves to. The world is a dangerous place, learn to hold yourself up.

> triggered faggot
> also "we"
top kek you rule over literally nothing triggered cuck, stop telling yourself that.

This man will likely be deported/gang raped before 30, life expectancy on trash isn't long.

this retarded

They seem quite easy to spot nowadays. The thougher they sound on the internet, the softer their fat belly is.

Mum would do better keep them long locked into their basement, there is the real world outside.

>tfw when theres already Trans people in our military getting paid to defend your autistic little ass LOL

this retarded

I would argue that most people who own guns legally have a certain respect for human life. This is what I was taught and what others have been taught as well who own guns. I don't believe that ops senario would ever happen in real life.there's too many factors that would stop such a situation.

With all this derailment of switching topics to communism, universal health care that also covers metal health would allow everyone to keep their guns, meaning socialism is indeed the way and brainwashed red scare conservatards inevitable give fuel to the neo-liberals who want to take their guns away.

Stay Mad Kids

Than God for those 1200 faggots. Spread evenly among all branches doing paper work or guarding bases. I feel so safe.

sure kid
this retarded

>can't argue
>this butthurt

I know you're trolling, but this
>Someday some little fucker will pull out his gun, and before he can do anything someone else will pull out their gun and kill him.
As an argument has literally never happened in any mass shooting ever.

This is what it sounds like when libs cry

Statistically speaking:

Concealed Carry Permit Owners are less likely to shoot the wrong person than police officers. This is because they witnessed the crime vs officers arriving on scene and having to determine what's going.

Conceal Carry owners are less likely to hit an innocent bystander by accident because again, they are closer to the crime and shoot, on average, at distances closer than police.

There has never, to my knowledge, been an instance of two people conceal carrying shooting each other vs the bad guy. That scenario where everyone goes crazy shooting everyone else just doesn't happen in the real world. Because in the real world, unlike here, not everyone is retarded.