Do you believe in god?
Do you believe in god?
Not really, no
Both parents are fedora and so do I
i don't believe
i KNOW
This.
Nah, it's a pretty silly concept. It's much easier to believe in Zeus and his children type shit then in one god
I know there isn't
Prove me wrong
Agnostic. Maybe there is a higher being but we can't proof it yet
Give me at least one logical reason to believe in God
Of course, user.
I'm not an edgy teenager, fedoralord or manchild atheist, pagan or non-Christian.
You will burn in if you don't Hell
Yes
I feel no connection to a divinity nor have seen evidence of one but reality is infinite so who the fuck nows. Though I highly doubt any man made religion is right.
humans KNOW there is something superior to themselves that caused all we are living in
since science doesn't have the answers yet you put a placeholder on it: that placeholder is God
you hate God
>nows
*knows
>I highly doubt any man made religion is right
and i KNOW none of them are right. but kudos for trying to hold people together
you see, religions are institutions. like schools and government. they just hold society together, there's no garantee they're able to do anything else
*tips*
NEI
NEJ
NO
nah
never have, nobody in my family does
Lets assume god exists.
Which god is the true god?
Allah? Jehova? Vishnu? Zeus?
>Which god is the true god?
what makes you they're not the same God with different names?
all and none
i'm not fully sure but i believe every human saw one face of God, that's why descriptions difer
The real one only that I believe into
makes you think*
No thats the thing.
If you are a christian and Islam is true, you will go to hell, it doesn't matter if you believed in god or not.
If you are a muslims and christianity is true, then you will also go to hell.
Its a fucking non logical game you play.
This isn't Sup Forums related. Go play your work simulator or something.
It can make you feel better about living in a shithole like Russia
Don't know a single person my age who does.
No.
Nah.
Hell is not a place though, lol
in case you didn't notice
but /his/ is for history
fucking /lit/, you killed it at birth
>I-I have to p-pay half of my yearly wage because my kid got a rare disease but It's just a-another God's test for me. God bless
everything is a test like it or not
even shitposting on Sup Forums gives experience
git gud
I put my experience points in lockpicking
religions =/= God
religions are made and managed by men, not by God, learn the difference
At least religion is exist yo
alright, prove that God doesn't exist.
>humans KNOW there is something superior to themselves that caused all we are living in
It's called "quantum fluctuations", user
>prove that man created concept derived from animalism is not a real thing
that's your God lol
you can call it whatever but you trust everything happens because of "quantum fluctuations" and "random astrophysical events". and it's fine
i'm never said i was here to force you into believing that some white bearded dude floating among clouds is the most powerful being in the Universe, the Creator, Destroyer and Sustainer. that's something cultural and i accept it the same way i accept Santa rides in his sleigh and Hitler died in his bunker in 1945. that's cultural, you and your buddies can have other culture
so you can't?
>you trust
Yeah, I tend to trust actual math more than some religious dogmas
Vishnu and Zeus are completely different from the Abrahamic God, they're not the sole deities of their own religions to begin with
what math? show me your calculations from pen and paper
o wait, you never did the math. you trust the person who did it. that's not very scientific mate, you are supposed to reproduce the same results after doing it yourself. otherwise it's blinde belief
>magic sky daddy
No.
>moral consensus/binding principles
Kinda?
Vishnu and Zeus like any or all of the other gods from polytheistic societies could very well be different societies with different perceptions of God
yeah but i get italianon's point, they were part of a polytheist system and had a specific function in the lore
on monotheistic systems God seems contradictory because He/It can change heart according to the narrative
but you don't think your mom can't be a good housewife/businesswoman by day and suck mean dick by night and you separate them into two different women, do you?
Then the concept of God is something really vague and I might as well say that atheists believe in the same God as Christians, they just named it "physical laws", something that controls the world and created humans
prove that you are not just my imagination
but in polytheist system, or at least in the ancient ones, there was the main God who did the universe and stuff and then came the secondary gods for rivers, rain and else, I think they're comparable to nowadays saints, just with different purposes
so we can't prove he exists but we can't prove that he doesn't either, what do then? how to be sure of one thing or another?
the ultimate autism ladies and gentlemen wena George Berkeley
of course it's the same concept, fedorafags are anti-religious, not actual atheists
nah AFAIK the creator would be Brahma not Vishnu
>I think they're comparable to nowadays saints, just with different purposes
yeah depending on who you ask, catholics or the competition
no not really
I think that being a sentient being is part of the definition of the word 'god'
I believe there may be a god(s), but we can't confirm or disprove it
It's the same with every concept.
t. plot of my imagination
>nah AFAIK the creator would be Brahma not Vishnu
I'm not fond on hinduism desu
no worries user, there's a reason for everything in life, even for atheism
>there was the main God who did the universe
>I think that being a sentient being is part of the definition of the word 'god'
In the Greek religion, the first Gods (of earth and sky) were born from Chaos, something that existed before the Gods, therefore no God created the universe
Religious determinism is not my thing fortunately
the good thing is...that doesn't matter if you believe on it or not :^)
and I'm not a determinist btw
this shitty argument is always brought up, especially by Christians who have read little to nothing about "God's other names". It doesn't work and doesn't make sense. The same outlandish claim can be made about any fictional work that occupies the same genre. "What if all detective novels are Sherlock Holmes with different names?" It can even be made about anything old enough in history. "What if the king of X was the same king of X, but with a different name?" There's really nothing that could suggest that there's one god who is somehow the same entity/ies "percieved" in a million different ways other than your imagination. That logic only makes said "god" even more contradictory and effectively nonexistent.
''What if all detective novels are Sherlock Holmes with different names?''
well can you prove otherwise?
that's not how it works. Another bullshit reply usually said by Christians. Do you also believe in Unicorns? Hobbits? No? Prove that they don't exist.
see you have to prove what has not been proven, not prove that was has not been proven is not proven.
Which God? It's kinda a lot of them.
>What if all detective novels are Sherlock Holmes with different names?
"All men who repeat a line from Shakespeare are William Shakespeare" t. Jorge Luis Borges
>That logic only makes said "god" even more contradictory
again, if you can't accept that your mom is a good woman and a whore at the same time, must you think they're two separate women?
yes, read all detective novels
>read all detective novels
they're all Holmes with different names and different personalities because they had different experiences in those books REEEEE
prove that not proving a negative isn't invalid
No, i dont care about religion
my mother can be a good woman and a whore, but can't also be a man, a boy, a fantastic creature born from an egg, a fantastic creature not born from an egg, the biological daughter of the president and the biological daughter of a ten other men all at the same time.
and God isn't the Devil or the Void
there are limits to the concept, but there's also a catch: the guys that pray to Allah get offended if others call It Jehovah, while those that pray to Jehovah get offended if others call It Allah
and Ganesha is a nice elephant-shaped aspect in one religion but got included in the Demonology book along with Baal, Belial, Ceres and all the "competition" in this other religion
the concept changes shape because of human (cultural) point of view, but not essence: you ask about the archetype and every human has it "God or Goddess is this Father or Mother of all Good blah blah Creation blah blah blessings for me and my people blah blah". there's something behind that concept, even if i risk being called platonic for it. it's just something that can be grasped and (hopefully) reached (or never reached, according to 's Agnosticism)