Navalny

Make russia great again, fight against Putin's corruption with Navalny!

Does it look like he'll win?

What's his foreign policy with America/Syria/Ukraine?

Will he start nuclear war?

i dont think rich liberals would know how to make russia great again

>His parents, Anatoly Ivanovich Navalny and Lyudmila Ivanovna Navalnaya, own a basket-weaving factory in the village of Kobyakovo, Moscow Oblast, which they have run since 1994

literal new rich baby, probably got hold of it through corruption

you need someone who comes from the ppl, for the ppl

>having someone that works with the people lead Russia

We all know how that ended last time.

>Petty factory in a village
>Rich
Praising poorness is plain stupid. And all other liberals Putin poisoned or imprisoned were all richer than him. In a country like Russia, you can't have a campaign without self funding. Even for a really rich man like Donald Trump, his campaign was devastating economically, and small compared to state supported Hillary.

No, he's just there to control hormone-induced schoolboys so they won't accidentaly make up some shit like maidan.

Is he still locked in his house or did butin let him out

He is future president

russia is poor, ppl who never experienced such conditions cannot possibly understand the life of theirs, thus will not better it

navalny will only apply western practices which wont work in russia

The choice is - rich liberals or ultra rich ex commie oligarchy

Shit or piss...i wonder what to choose.

Piss is always better

Speaking like a true expert heh. You should learn a thing or two about Eskobar theory.

He's right tho. Piss is always better than scat

Kek. Only stupid shoolboys fap to him.

Do they have to fap to putin? Hmm.

A bit similar to Putin's one. I mean, most likely he won't give back Crimea or South Ossetia/Abkhazia.

And no, he won't start nuclear war, he's pro-Western nationalistic liberal actually.

why the fuck does Russia want Crimea so badly?

It can't be more beneficial than not having it, with all the sanctions because of it

Any russian leader who will give it away will become the most unpopular one and will be compared to Gorbachyov. Too many reasons why people want it in.

another burger who doesn know shit about geography and its politics
also wages decreased because of oil prices not because of sanctions

>a huge amount of population Russian-speaking population, sympathetic to Moscow
>the huge military naval dockyard with rich maritime tradition
>the fundamental key to controlling Black Sea
>the Portsmouth of Southern Russia
>teh blood shed by Russian soldiers in war with the Ottomans for controlling Crimea WE WUZ!!!

Not gonna justify Putin for stealing it, but Ukrainians didn't use it anyway, they just took money for renting the docks. Although that was a good resort area by the sea, now it's Russian.

Navalny won't give back the Crimea, it's as obvious as it's clear that America will never sale Alaska back to Russia or allow independence for indigenous people.

У мeня лyчший oбpaз

I know the story behind Crimea dumbass. That doesn't change the fact that it's rightfully Ukrainian, and that when Russia annexed it it was illegal.

And I wasn't talking about wages for the Russians, I really don't give a damn about those, but their overall economy is going to keep declining, with the sanctions. And your a fucking retard if you think any NATO country, or NATO friendly country will remove them. It makes us look weak.

>rightfully Ukrainian

its rightfully crimean

Just as much as Cascadia is rightfully Cascadian

>but their overall economy is going to keep declining, with the sanctions
but its is not currently
>That doesn't change the fact that it's rightfully Ukrainian
lel, let it be a decision of the people on the pininsula not yours

notanamericanagent.jpg

Get the fuck out of here with your Nasralny meme, underage debil

are you the swiss with russian wife?

God bless Navalny, a martyr. Fuck putinshit.

>let it be a decision of the people on the peninsula not yours

If that's how the world works then the Confederate States would still exist.

Indigenous people aren't subject to the federal governments laws on their land and have their own Justice and legal systems. Only problem is their land is the shittiest available in the middle of arid plains or the desert so they couldn't do much with it even if they tried.

in this particular case it was indeed useful to hold a referendum

мнe нpaвитcя, кaк pyccкий и yкpaинeц cpyтcя нa aнглийcкoм.

God bless president Navalny

In case with Navalny, as he said: "Crimea isn't a sausage, if they already voted to join Russia and we spent that much money to integrate them, we cannot give them back and betray all those people. We have to make an agreement with Ukrainians and Americans."

In case with Putin, after Maidan Ukraine was going to join the EU and NATO and BTFO our fleet which was located in Crimea. In that case there would have been NATO bases instead of ours. Putin couldn't afford it and they just annexed the region. Crimea was the most pro-Russian region of the Ukraine, so it was very popular decision.

That makes more sense as to why he took Crimea, but military still wasn't the right way to go about it.

>nationalistic liberal

He has a lot of populistic nationalist rhetorics. He wants to introduce a visa regime with all Middle Asian countries like Uzbekistan, Tajikistan and even Kazakhstan, he had some harsh statements about Ingush/Chechen/Dagestani behaviour in Moscow, so he tried to gain the support of Russian nationalists.

At the same time he is pro-LGBT, supports equal rights for everyone, says that economics must be open and supports business. So I guess nationalistic liberal is the right term.