Has anyone else received this ban and come to the realisation that the mods don't have a fucking clue about what...

Has anyone else received this ban and come to the realisation that the mods don't have a fucking clue about what they're doing and just throw out arbitrary bans at random?

If this were properly enforced, there would be no creepshot, shouldn;t share and loli threads

Other urls found in this thread:

nytimes.com/2002/04/16/national/supreme-court-strikes-down-ban-on-virtual-child-pornography.html
cnn.com/2014/03/06/opinion/cevallos-upskirt-ruling/index.html
en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ashcroft_v._Free_Speech_Coalition
twitter.com/SFWRedditVideos

What did you post user?

Maybe it's because the shit you post is stupid as fuck? Try to be less of a faggot.

No, my bans have been well deserved.

I work with the police identifying CP victims. We were having a decent discussion about the matter. No pictures, no descriptions (apart from the OP, but none after that).

I was permabanned for "advocating child pornography on the sports board"

and were you?

My last two bans were complete bullshit, and they were both short, so no point in appealing them.

Yes

If I were why the fuck would I be doing it on the sports board?

I got this for posting horse pussy. I didn't see anything wrong with what I was doing

I've gotten that ban before. Its complete bullshit. Last time it happened I was in a thread that started with a mantis eating a chicks nipple, lols were had and some faggot pruned the thread. So I created a thread basically to say wtfm8.png

Next thing I know its hammer time.

>work with the police identifying CP victims
>""""""""the police""""""""

um-hum

good point, well made

The correct term would be mare pussy, I believe.

It's a bit more in depth than just that, but yes

seen it. saved it. weird shit.

Explain then faggot

Post?

Creepshots and Loli are 100% legal as ruled by the Supreme Court of the United States, moron.

Some fucker at work gets the whole subnet banned for shitposting on Sup Forums and then I have to go whole workdays not getting any dubs

I got banned once for posting in an animal abuse thread. It was like 25 days long. In both my appeals I asked them to cite what law I violated by posting in a thread showing animal abuse.

mods have been fags since moot left.

lol. You can't even argue this, and we all know it. You would be incapable to provide proof of either.

I was thinking about this the other day
I remember loli threads were banned back then (2008-2010 period) but now I see they are allowed
What changed?

I've been browsing Sup Forums since 09 and never was banned. this past year in 2017 I was banned 6 times.

>calling for mods in pizza thread. banned both times
>posting a single spidey pic in loli thread, banned for flooding/spamming twice
>said 'sage'
>posted FB group of log posters

>animal abuse
>mods are faggots
Yeah okay

I didn't post any animal abuse. I just asked a question to some fag that was posting it. I got banned for that.

Tell me that's not god-tier faggotry.

Oh well if that's the case then yeah wizard-tier

posted cp or necro.

I bet my dick on that.

OP didn't post pizza. I saw the thread before it 404d.
OP might get banned again for 'ban evasion' now that he posted the screenshot. Also I think discussing bans isn't allowed but I don't give a shit. It's petty at this point.

It really depends on the mod, if he's nice or not.

>loli banned

Nigga are you high? Loli has never been banned on Sup Forums.

Hello friend

Yeah, banning someone who can easily evade bans is kinda self-defeating. But if it makes them feel better about themselves...

They don't like & will kill any discussion threads about CP/pedophilia/hebephilia outright, regardless of the hows/whys of the discussion, even if there are no images at all.
Been like that for a good while.

I thought OP was phone posting. but I could be wrong.

I remember loli breads getting removed long time ago, I'm not even joking
Talking about 2008 to 2010

I got IP banned because I posted from my wifi and my mobile data too close together because my wifi/power went out. They classified it as spam or something

Fuck no. That way incarceration lies

Then they have no credibility

Fucking hate that, when they ban everyone in the thread even if 95% of posters were anti-OP's point

I think they realized the hypocrisy of it all.

>post doggo pron
>1 month ban
>fast forward to now
>doggo porn is OK
Can I have my month back?

Cool where are you based? I can't see your IP in any of our verified offices.

Got banned for three days for posting porn on Sup Forums.

It's because ALL of the mods think Sup Forums is a joke and want nothing to do with it.
>pic related: all the people who think you're fucking morons

Dude, I've been here since the beginning. The only time loli came close to not being allowed was when /l/ got moved over to not4chan and everyone was splitting time between here and there.

I use dynamic ip so occasionally I get a thing saying I was banned years ago for something fucked up ect

Yes.
I've been banned like 3 times all for shit I never even did.
>Replying to a raid thread.
Not been in a raid thread since the good old days of raiding, several years at least... got the ban a year or 2 ago.
>Requesting CP.
Never once done that.
I go to loli boards to tell them to kill themselves and that's as close as it gets to that.

best thing to do is not even associate with loli/shota fans, too close to being cheese pizza honestly

Is necropedophilia illegal? I mean, the kid is dead, but at the same time I think it depicts an illegal activity.

It's still considered CP because it's a visual depiction of a child in a sexual manner. make sense?

Thought it had to do with it being an actual record of child abuse, in accordance to US law.

I was one banned for posting a photoshop of OBama sucking a hose cock a mod didn't like, citing that it was illegal, wich it is not

>I go to loli boards to tell them to kill themselves and that's as close as it gets to that.
I think the jannies just ban everyone in the thread. They replied once to my ban to "not reply at all" even if it is condemning anons

I'll take your word on it then, I stopped visiting Sup Forums until recently

no it's still pizza.
but it wouldn't hold up in court as sexual assault of a minor.
any photos or video taken by the defendant would be used against him as possession and manufacturing. either way the judge is going to throw the book for something like that.

yes but mods don't moderate Sup Forums though

>I can't see your IP in any of our verified offices

>I go to loli boards to tell them to kill themselves
I do the same thing in trap threads.
Nice to meet a kindred spirit.

>mods don't moderate Sup Forums
wot

they don't.

nytimes.com/2002/04/16/national/supreme-court-strikes-down-ban-on-virtual-child-pornography.html

"the CPPA prohibits speech that records no crime and creates no victims by its production. Virtual child pornography is not “intrinsically related” to the sexual abuse of children,... For this reason, it is overbroad and
unconstitutional."

So ruled the court (Ashcroft v. Free Speech Coalition).

cnn.com/2014/03/06/opinion/cevallos-upskirt-ruling/index.html

Loli: en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ashcroft_v._Free_Speech_Coalition

Did you discuss something that is against the law?

Thankfully the Supreme Court still has some fucking sense.

Lol. You can't even argue that you're not retarded.

See

>discussions are illegal
>a discussion in & of itself, regardless of its content, can be deemed illegal
Fuck this gay ass earth

they can just ban you for anything they want, there is no consistency

The drawings or the paintings?

>stupid loli doll shit
kek
better buy 'em now, that won't last too much longer
already working on banning them

>The drawings or the paintings?
Neither of those is illegal

Sex w dogs is a good way to avoid pregnancy, rape, and stds.
The site isn't ran by diseased rapists anymore.

And yet that disturbingly realistic 3D loli porn remains. :(

Thank Christ.

Are porn pictures a discussion?

>Sex w dogs is a good way to avoid rape
Not for the dog