Let's clear any confusion: these 3 are the best female artists ever. prove me wrong

let's clear any confusion: these 3 are the best female artists ever. prove me wrong.

Other urls found in this thread:

youtube.com/watch?v=L8JVSYj-qV8
twitter.com/AnonBabble

How come the three best female artists only got recognized or any critical acclaim for their sex appeal?

wow, Joni Mitchell looks different on the bottom there.

wrong, its actually Grouper

Kate Bush
Tine Weymouth
Kim Deal

>grimes
>having sex appeal
lmao
i like you
>three

Nah they are actually among the worst. Not even joking. They aren't making dense works full of intricate melody, harmony, and dynamics like Sofia Gubaidulina nor are they experimental on the level of someone like Pauline Oliveros. Instead they chose the easiest musical medium to work with, pop music. That in of itself automatically disqualifies them from best female artists ever contention. Don't get me wrong, I love me some pop music; sometimes you just need something light and fun to counteract the highly engaging or highly experimental works out there. But you what makes these three among the worst female artists? That instead of making fun, catchy pop ditties, instead of making bangers, they make pretentious garbage that tries to be "artistic" without any of the real intricacy and depth that comes with being considered a truly respectable female artist within serious music. It's literally the worst of all worlds. Not as much a catchy banger as pop music generally is. Nowhere near the complexity and depth of art music. Faux experimentation passed of as being real experimentation of musical concepts. Only the most pretentious fucks can enjoy pretentious all image no music garbage like these three.

>three
ok

Grouper
Kate Bush
Hope Sandoval

this

Borderline retarded
I love these three and I can at least see arguments for bjork and grimes trying too hard, but Kate? Really?