What would it take for California to go red? Or Texas to go blue?

What would it take for California to go red? Or Texas to go blue?

ethnic cleansing

>California to go red
Kill/deport all of San Francisco, San Diego, and other major cities.

>Texas go blue
Step one: remove gerrymandering which dominates the state
>> gerrymandering is supported by both Democrats and Republicans in Texas
Step Two: make Austin count for 50% of the state's electoral votes

Switch LA with Dallas and SF with Houston

Houston is disgustingly liberal

>Houston would make California go red
Unless you mean the area surrounding Houston, no. The city itself is very liberal; that's why they elected that lesbian as mayor so she could continue making the city a Mexican colony

Really? That shit is sad, was Houston always like this?

>red Cali
Economic collapse due to drought and just too much welfare causing the city spics to flee and the remaining people to harden the fuck up.

>blue Texas
More immigration, more growth of cities and movement of people out of rural areas.

>Texas
Five more years of a generation in the public schools being indoctrinated with socialism and amnesty. May go blue this year
>California
Repeal Wesberry v Sanders and Washington state goes red too

I laughed out loud because it's true
fpbp

The anti-trump rioting is helping turn California red. Maybe not this election, but it's going that way.

Texas took a ruse Cruz. They're going to be the new California in twenty years, just wait.

This honestly. Like the rest of the country, the majority of non-hispanic whites consider themselves conservative and vote that way.

>California to go Red
Nuke it and make sure the wall gets built

>Texas to go Blue
If amnesty was passed and nothing is done about illegal immigration, it will happen on its own in about 20-30 years

Since I lived there any 10 years ago, yes. The outer regions are pretty conservative, but the closer you get to the metropolitan area the more liberal you get.

Based Texan here, our last governor election was 60-40 conservative. Houston and Austin are cucked by hippies and illegals, but dallas is half conservative at least. Texas will stay red for the next 20 years, longer if trump actually nuts up and deports illegals.

What happens that bigger city/closer to centre = more liberal idiots? Seems to be the case in whole US
Is it because of shitty universities, wealth and no life experience?

I feel like this is the best chance commiefornia has in years to go red. It probably wont, but damn, I'll be trying.

>What would it take for California to go red?
Less mexicans

>Or Texas to go blue?
More mexicans

Literally true.
Only way for Cali to go red would be to get rid of the millions upon millions of mexicans. For reference, there are more beaners there than white people.

As for texas, it will eventually go blue if you just keep the current trajectory. That's why we need a fucking wall.

> what happens that bigger/closer city more liberals

The closer they are to the center of the city/the bigger city they live in, generally speaking, the less likely they are to work a production-oriented job (such as manufacturing or agriculture), and thus they tend to work social or service jobs, meaning that they tend to put less focus on hard work and more focus on making social networking to swindle themselves a career.
>but most of Houston is offices!
Ran by petroleum people who don't live within city limits, thus don't vote in Houston elections. It's the irony of the American big city: most of the economy relies on people who don't have anything to do with their politics.

>is it because universities/wealth/no life experience?
A bit of all of this.

The closer you are to other people, the more you tend to care about other people.

a chanfe in race/wealth

Texan here. From Houston. Lived here my entire life, the issue is the amount of spics and the amount of niggers running around. Houston has entire wards now people avoid because gang warfare/drug cartels run rampant in them.

Let me reword this because it seems a but incoherent when I reread it..

Generally speaking, people who value hard work in America are general conservatives, especially traditionalists, because traditional jobs such as manufacturing and agriculture meant:
work more = produce more = paid more

However manufacturing and agriculture was driving out of the metropolitan area and the jobs were replaced with more socially-oriented work. It was a "revolution" where networking and being a good bullshitter was actually more useful than being a harder worker. Thus, people from these metro-centers would tend to support policies which favored networking and left-wing labour unions rather than hard work. Thus you see metro centers becoming more liberal and left while outskirts remain more conservative.

But there's the ironic part where, because metrocenters don't actually produce anything, they rely on the manufacturers and the agrarians on the outskirts. Richer industries then use these cities as headquarters to attract customers, which leaves the irony: almost all of a city's economy relies barely entirely on people who live outside of the city's political district. The ones who control the economy have no say in the city's policy (which is why they lobby)

The conservative guy almost won the last mayor election. Instead Houston got that useless nigger, it's such a shame too; maybe he could have helped clean up the streets. Maybe if there is more gentrification, more conservative people will move in.

>because people in the city care so much more about people than people in the regional farmtown communities

You've never even left your metropolitan center, have you, nigger? That, or maybe you were so arrogant that they rightly bitched you out and you're still mad

Transport all the Mexicans in California to Texas.

1. I'm white
2. I live in the middle of nowhere

Literally fpbp 70% Hispanics vote for the D they must go back

Conservative people have no reason to move to Houston, mate. Schools are far superior in outside counties like Galveston and such. They'll work in Houston, sure, but loving in Houston is suicide with property taxes bring bad enough in the outer regions

Ditch the spics and feminazis and California would be 80% GOP.

San Diego is normally light red. Gerrmandering has nothing to do with the presidential election.

Then you're retarded if you actually believe that city people care more about people than country people. City people's animosity towards people is the primary draw to give up life in the city

All the liberals and mexicans in California moving to Austin
>tfw it's happening

Step two refered to the presidential election.
Step one was about the society in general.

>schools in Galveston
>superior

Can you hear all the rich white and Asians in clear lake laughing at you?

Yeah, because I fucked a girl from Clear Lake and graduated from CCISD while I lived in Galveston County.

>Yeah, because I fucked a girl from Clear Lake

t. Mexican

Also: Only one? A hundred thousand rich girls with daddy issues and a coke habit and you only got one?

I went to school at CSHS... Why would I waste all that time fucking Lake girls when they were the furthest away?
>actually I mostly fucked Creek girls

That said, I was one of the few white people who lived in my area... So yeah I understand the mexican remark...

Correct

>California
A major earthquake that kills everyone on the coast.

>Texas
Follow current demographic trends.

>Kill San Diego
FRIENDLY FIRE

>More immigration, more growth of cities and movement of people out of rural areas.


Build the Wall!

Why not go SB1070 on their asses?

>But there's the ironic part where, because metrocenters don't actually produce anything, they rely on the manufacturers and the agrarians on the outskirts. Richer industries then use these cities as headquarters to attract customers, which leaves the irony: almost all of a city's economy relies barely entirely on people who live outside of the city's political district. The ones who control the economy have no say in the city's policy (which is why they lobby)


Ironic as fuck..

>Also: Only one? A hundred thousand rich girls with daddy issues and a coke habit and you only got one?
Highest of fives...