It's a Bill Nye teaches the kids that "love" is "just chemicals" and that they "love" their parents to munch off of...

>it's a Bill Nye teaches the kids that "love" is "just chemicals" and that they "love" their parents to munch off of them and that "Alexa loved me to munch of off me too, that w-h-o-r- whooops can't say that on TV, kids!"

Other urls found in this thread:

washingtontimes.com/news/2016/apr/14/bill-nye-open-criminal-charges-jail-time-climate-c/
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Global_warming
theconversation.com/inside-americas-science-lobby-what-motivates-aaas-members-to-engage-the-public-38065
youtube.com/watch?v=0gDErDwXqhc
amazon.com/dp/B01I497JAM/ref=cm_sw_r_cp_apa_bC0jybWAH4JC9
washingtontimes.com/news/2015/apr/27/obama-backed-green-energy-failures-leave-taxpayers/
twitter.com/AnonBabble

...

>it's a guy who's not even a real scientist brainwashes children into believing his marxist ideals episode

I hear Bill Nye like his pizza with no hair.

That Disney studio he worked on for so long had plenty of pizza, I bet.

...

pizza = kids
fucking pedos

I can't believe that based on his credentials he's only as smart as your average engineering major who posts here.

engineers are all autists
source:my dad is an engineer

what political agenda has he been pushing

he did say that 'climate deniers' should be jailed

I can get behind that. It's like global treason

should the poor be gassed too for using too much of our resources and not contributing enough?

I think they used to call it the Inquisition

Does Bill currently advocate for any views that are not in line with what scientists support?

This would be a legitimate argument if he were arguing against vaccine or against GMO food or against belief in global warming or against teaching evolution
Pretty sure he acts as an advocate for the beliefs of scientists, seems like a legitimate use of his fame

I love the poorly educated

when?

Honestly, ideally, yes. Not specifically poor people but poor people that have reached a certain age. Successful people of a certain age should be killed too.

Society would be better if no one made it past 70.

washingtontimes.com/news/2016/apr/14/bill-nye-open-criminal-charges-jail-time-climate-c/

yeah, NEETs, poor people, and the mentally disabled should be gassed

lead by example mate

It has to be a global government thing or it's not going to work.

This too.

The idea that race literally does not exist, which is demonstrably false.

Seems reasonable to punush companies that espouse objectively false claims with the aim to trick people
They should jail people like Jenny McCarthy and Dr. Oz too, pseudo science leftists are the worst

I think that comes down to more of a semantic argument of how you define race rather than a scientific issue

>objectively false claims
wow I had no idea can you link me to the proof?

I'm not someone who thinks climate change is a certain catastrophe, or that the government should throw money at it or kill the economy to try and fix it, but global warming is objectively a thing that is happening, and anyone telling you otherwise is either delusional or trying to trick you

that's just a bunch of words not a link

Sure, you can define anything out of existence if you fiddle with the definition enough.

In any case, it's certainly part of the political agenda of multiculturalism and mass immigration.

I think you can google global warming on your own, there is literally no reason to doubt that it is occurring, thats almost on par with doubting that evolution is a real thing

more words but no link, wow man you sure are convincing me!

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Global_warming

...

>There is continuing discussion through published peer-reviewed scientific papers
sure sounds like it's an objective fact to me
>opinions are facts

Its a measurable fact that the earth is warmer now than it was even only 50 years ago, look at the multiple charts of actual data included on that wikipedia page

>In the scientific literature, there is a strong consensus that global surface temperatures have increased in recent decades and that the trend is caused mainly by human-induced emissions of greenhouse gases.[234] No scientific body of national or international standing disagrees with this view

Try reading the whole thing. There's always continuing discussion on every single facet of scientific discovery.

climate change/global warming espouse more than merely climate change. It is stated that it is human caused and there will be no rebound effect from the accumulation of CO2
the source to your statement the debunked john cook papers

more like opinions made by knowledgeable people are more likely to be accurate than the opinions of the average cunt

seriously, it's not hard to understand, you don't have to feel the same way because they feel the same way, but the same evidence that convinces them should convince you, and the fact that it doesn't is the willful ignorance and the search for contrary evidence (which is explained by actual scientists as being either bunk or misleading) showing up in your decision making schema.

Maybe you're just being a contrarian for the sake of it, global warming (or climate change whatever phrase it's the same phenomena) is occurring, there's a shitload of debate about to what extent (killin' fucking everything, not killin' fucking everything etc etc) but there's no debate as to it happening (outside of fringe aforementioned contrarians).

There's a reason anti-cc sophists are funded almost exclusively by people who stand to profit from the things that climate scientists say causes cc.

Don't be retarded, actually educate yourself, don't just read "arguments against cc" and think that it's not happening.

>. It is stated that it is human caused
The correlation between CO2 emissions and increased global temperature are pretty clearly measured, there is no dissent on this issue amongst educated people
>and there will be no rebound effect from the accumulation of CO2
I don't even know what you are referring to here
Note, I really don't think the government can do anything to stop it, and any proposed solution so far is just wasteful and futile, but to deny that global warming is a thing is just fucking dumb

k
theconversation.com/inside-americas-science-lobby-what-motivates-aaas-members-to-engage-the-public-38065

Looking at who funds the pro/anti side of any issue is one of the best ways to form an opinion.

you guys sure love your words. have some molymeme youtube.com/watch?v=0gDErDwXqhc

Everything he said is right, btw.

;)

He does have that creepy vibe about him

STOP TURNING MY MEME THREAD INTO Sup Forums!!!

sorry bud I love arguing too much

Well, global warming is real. You're literally autistic if you think otherwise.

Well I guess I will just take your word for it now. You completely fucking moron.

Maybe take the word of every educated person rather than some conspiracy theory

amazon.com/dp/B01I497JAM/ref=cm_sw_r_cp_apa_bC0jybWAH4JC9

>the conspiracy theory is that the world isnt going to end in twenty years because of a slight increase in co2 concentrations

Uhhh... Is that even a question? It should be a true statement

>there's no lobby for green energy, solar and wind are totally viable and not subsidized by the government
washingtontimes.com/news/2015/apr/27/obama-backed-green-energy-failures-leave-taxpayers/

...

>implying you can prove that I can't prove it

the conspiracy theory is that 99% of scientists signed a secret agreement to try and trick you into thinking the world is getting warmer

No one is saying world is going to end
Just that temperature is going to rise which has happened in the history of earth several times, just not as fast as it is happening right now, so less time to adapt.
Currently we are living very cold period as far as the history of life on earth is concerned
Fuck, the warming atmosphere is beneficial for some to some degree.

It is being overplayed though. Wind/Wave are NOT viable solutions either. Nuclear/Fusion could be. Not supporting these solutions and pushing more and more green taxes is a cynical exploitation of what could be a real problem.

I dont know why you are still posting nonsense when I already told you it was debunked, isn't my word good enough for you?

It fucking sucks that leftists are so against Nuclear when most scientists agree we should have been using it this whole time
Its the best thing we have to combat global warming, but pseudoscience fearmongers have poisoned it in the public eye

um, what was debunked? The fact that almost all scientists, and even simply people who went to college agree global warming is a thing based on the multitude of evidence?

see

how does that inform this discussion in any way?

except al gore?

How do your statements using logical fallacies?

That's why we need the Party of Progress and Reason. Like the green party, but with less ties to specific agendas.

lol at the idea that the Green Party, the party of anti-vaxxers, homeopathy, alternative medicine, and nuclear fearmongering, and backwards populist economic views is the party of reason. The libertarians are the closest thing we have to people who actually support reason and true progress

>The libertarians are the closest thing we have to people who actually support reason and true progress
muh gold standard and youtube video conspiracy education...libertarians are 14 year old republicans who don't want to admit they are just like their conservative parents yet and think 18th century economic theory already failed in every country it was tried in is a solution to problems in modern economic globalization

Isn't he against GMOs?

Wait...capitalism failed in every country?

No, Bill is in favor of GMOs

What the fuck are you even talking about? Libertarians support the economic policy that reason lead us to, the one that has been the most successful the world has ever seen. Enough of this Bernie Sanders populism bullshit
>libertarians are 14 year old republicans
um, except that libertarians are very liberal on social issues, much beyond where the democrat party goes, and they are actual fiscal conservatives, quite unlike the republican party. Plus they are anti-foreign aggression unlike both the democrats and republicans (side note, how fucking crazy is it that the democrats are the ones to put up the warmongering candidate in the most recent election, who the fuck saw that coming 10 years ago?)

Your entire analysis is fucking weird and not based in reality

>munch
The term is "mooch," Pajeet.

Correlation != causation

no, but the multitude of available evidence strongly suggests causation

>It's a Bill Nye tells the kids the world is warming due to human emissions episode

The "evidence" is all purely correlation. On the contrary, we recently see lots of evidence saying that despite the constant increase in greenhouse gas emissions, the temperature increase is not growing and suggestions that this is all part of a natural cycle.

>status quo bourgeois liberal
>Marxist

fuck you

you have no idea what you're talking about

t. bakuninite

>suggestions that this is all part of a natural cycle.
No we don't
Its quite likely natural cycles are a small contributing factor, but there is no doubt in the evidence that human driven emissions of grenhouse gases such as CO2 and methane is the primary factor

What Liberals today express is based on arguments that you must not make judgements and you must not admit there is an external reality which is not socially constructed. All differences in outcome, we're supposed to believe, are socially constructed, and can be socially deconstructed.

Which is what Marxism is all about. Sidestepping important questions by adopting post-modern philosophy to argue that we shouldn't even ask such questions; we should simply distribute everything proportionately among all groups.

Do you seriously think Bill Nye is a marxist?

Wow!
Marx BTFO
Hegel BTFO
Derrida BTFO

This user just ended all philosophy by parroting fat illiterate charlatans like crowder. It really DOESNT mean anything because a NEET doesn't get it.

I bet you think anarchism is right wing too you fucking brainwashed mongoloid ameridumb

>sidestepping important questions

like "you don't support frogposting white nationalism, what are you a cuck?"

keep spouting your class warfare supporting junk though it'll keep porky happy

You are so painfully ill-informed.

Marx is pretty fucking shitty, and modern liberal race baiting is also pretty fucking shitty, but they definitely aren't the same thing even if some of their roots are similar