Is it true?

Is it true?

Attached: gQTW9AmvW6ao6rXYHhJdilIgatT3S.jpg (650x365, 30K)

Other urls found in this thread:

twitter.com/JulianAssange/status/972190598219292672
wsws.org/en/articles/2018/03/07/dems-m07.html
twitter.com/SFWRedditImages

Lol. Tell us how you really feel Demofags.

>the systematic use of terror especially as a means of coercion
No, the NRA doesn't fit this description. It's debatable as to what "terror" is though. Some may argue that a gun club itself is scary enough to be considered terror.

This libel is criminally actionable offense.
Without proof of conviction of domestic terrorism charges from any federal or state court or official declaration of domestic terror organization by the Department of Justice, these are lies that can be tried in both criminal and civil court as it damages the reputation of this organization.
Mods should immediately remove this thread for these illegal postings.

Nah. They're shills who profit off mainstream media's fear mongering. GOA is better.

Libel of Public figures/organizations is hard to prove because it needs to be proven that the negative statements were written with malice. Intent is hard to prove.

Pretty much, yes.
Consider this:
- The NRA advocates for personal gun ownership
- Every single day a gun owner kills people for fun
- Military grade automatic rifles 15's are sold by NRA
- The NRA posts daily videos on how to kill people
- Most NRA members are white, which statistically is the most dangerous race and is killing people the most

Looking forward to following the lawsuit. I stocking up on popcorn.

Flawless logic there.

Studies have proven that NRA members have mentally unstable children and are more likely to abuse said children. Same study also revealed that NRA members are heavily into black-on-white cuckold porn.

This is a reminder that these posts are structured COINTELPRO, deliberate propaganda.

Attached: gCcwVGD.png (624x628, 81K)

This is fairly maliceful. Accusing someone of domestic terrorism in most instances would be a nightmare for the average joe.
Even for groups or companies with “good” legal representation you’re talking hundreds of thousands in legal expenses at the least, if not millions should the government believe it may be remotely true.
At the very least, the civil liability of damaged reputation is easier to prove with polling and loss of revenue statistics from loss of advertisers and membership loss.

Defense exhibit A

Attached: dana-loesch.png (672x372, 300K)

1

Attached: 1520041146387.jpg (486x800, 73K)

2

Attached: 1520320816896.jpg (489x800, 77K)

3

Attached: 1520320834883.jpg (489x800, 71K)

4

Attached: 1520320852412.jpg (487x800, 76K)

5

Attached: 1520320868305.jpg (487x800, 77K)

6

Attached: 1520320885199.jpg (489x800, 72K)

7

Attached: 1520320916242.jpg (489x800, 79K)

It's not just true, it's a fact.
Think about it like this, 99.9% of victims of gun violence are injured or actually killed by a bullet. Care to guess what you load inside a gun to make it shoot? What if I told you it was bullets? That's right, the same bullets that kill millions of innocent children everyday.
*Mic drop*
Now you woke

8

Attached: 1520320938506.jpg (489x800, 63K)

9

Attached: 1520320959208.jpg (490x800, 89K)

No. That Governor is actually an Anti-American liberal.

Now the BLM and Antifa are actual terrorists.

10

Attached: 1520320991697.jpg (486x800, 72K)

11

Attached: 1520322242941.jpg (488x800, 72K)

All reposting this stuff over and over does is confirm more deeply that you are a shill.

Attached: ha ha yes sickos.png (152x254, 40K)

12

Attached: 1520321016921.jpg (490x800, 53K)

>one man's terrorist is another man's freedom fighter

>twitter.com/JulianAssange/status/972190598219292672
>CIA officers flood into Democratic party for 2018 mid terms
>wsws.org/en/articles/2018/03/07/dems-m07.html
>An extraordinary number of former intelligence and military operatives from the CIA, Pentagon, National Security Council and State Department are seeking nomination as Democratic candidates for Congress in the 2018 midterm elections. The potential influx of military-intelligence personnel into the legislature has no precedent in US political history.

Attached: 1520626071261.png (595x336, 50K)