Who are the "Tolerant" Ones?

I have Liberals right now telling me that the US needs to get rid of Freedom of Speech and institute "Tolerance" laws to make sure that Americans respect each other.

They think there should be "laws" that force you to like each other. And they are saying that the Republican party should be outlawed and that the presidential election should just be between Clinton and Sanders.... "for Tolerance because only tolerant people should be able to be president."

What the fuck. Who gets to decide who the "tolerant" ones are?

Other urls found in this thread:

europarl.europa.eu/meetdocs/2009_2014/documents/libe/dv/11_revframework_statute_/11_revframework_statute_en.pdf
youtube.com/watch?v=-Yss1iugyGY
twitter.com/NSFWRedditVideo

Being tolerant is retarded.

...

The thing that really gets me is that "Tolerance" gets to be decided by whom? BLM? What would their "tolerance" look like?

The Democratic Party? Would the DNC say Bernie is bad because his crowd is "too white" and "too male" like they've said a million times?

What if only women got to enforce "Tolerance"? Would it be all "don't question that rape victim carrying the mattress or else you're being intolerant!"

That will eventually lead to the opposite effect and incite extremism. And freedom of speech allows you to fully understand what's going through the minds of different groups, and eventually root the problem, or at the very least understand what's causing people to develop that mindset.

I believe in full freedom of speech, in a sense that we should also be allowed to debate genocide, as when you have enough people encouraging the act against a group, then that specific group must be a serious problem within that population and something would have to be done to come to a solution. I'm fine with the current laws we have, but it's still not good enough.

The EU currently has laws about how you have to tolerate people.

And that's why police got in trouble if they tried to arrest or question the rapists in Rotherham. Are there more examples of this type of "forced toleration"?

Hmmm... can I get more replies if I post more boobies.... let me give it a try.

>WE DEMAND TOELRANCE UNLIKE THOSE EVIL LIBERALS
>MEXICANS ARE RAPISTS AND MUSLIMS SHOULD BE BANNED FROM COMING TO THE COUNTRY
ah, the right-wing's definition of "tolerance"

top kek

Don't you have some Paki's that you have to let rape your wife's daughter in order to prove how "tolerant" you are?

Doesn't sound very tolerant to me. Sounds like they want to impose their ideals on everyone else. That's like the opposite of tolerant.

This. There is no one more pathetic than the "Muh freeze peach" shills. I won't see it in my lifetime, but it does my heart good to know that hate speech will be restricted in a few generations.

Literally no one has said this you faggot. He just doesn't want to illegal immigrants.

Liberals are the new face of tyranny, censorship and extreme intolerance in America.

They conveniently forget that freedom of speech does not just cover things you agree with. They will use any means necessary to silence and intimidate their critics and opponents, and this includes violence.

Growing up I always thought this threat would come from the extreme right, however now I realize the enemy has been standing behind me the whole time.

Apparently the EU already did this in laws called the "Statute for the Promotion of Tolerance".

It's now being enforced by FaceBook, who will now turn europeans over to the government who are "not tolerant enough".

Here's the link to the European Law that Liberals are wanting enforced here. Right now FaceBook deletes "non-tolerant" posts in the US. But they want tobe able to have those people arrested by the government and get the 1st amendment repealed.

europarl.europa.eu/meetdocs/2009_2014/documents/libe/dv/11_revframework_statute_/11_revframework_statute_en.pdf

You can tolerate whoever you want and whichever group you want, but you can also blame the groups for behaving in ways that lead people to develop a bias against them. All terrorists being Muslims, people will develop a natural tendency to dislike Muslims, it doesn't matter if "not all of them are terrorists", your cognitive instincts will subconsciously tell you to be careful around that group.

For the same reason you have an inclination to not just tolerate but also appreciate people from Denmark, for example, because they built that positive image for themselves as a group according to their actions throughout History and as a people in general, so others will develop a natural bias in favour of Danes, which also leads to empathy. Same goes for South Koreans, Australians, the Dutch and so on.

If those Americans dislike Mexicans and Muslims, you can only blame the Mexicans and Muslims for building a negative image upon themselves, not the Americans who dislike them.

>they are saying that the Republican party should be outlawed and that the presidential election should just be between Clinton and Sanders

Liberalism means tolerance of liberalism. It is the freedom & liberty to agree with them or suffer the consequences.

Pathetic post f a m

Who cares, post more titties.

KEEP YOUR HATE SPEECH OFF OF CAMPUS
KEEP YOUR HATE SPEECH OFF OF CAMPUS
KEEP YOUR HATE SPEECH OFF OF CAMPUS
KEEP YOUR HATE SPEECH OFF OF CAMPUS
KEEP YOUR HATE SPEECH OFF OF CAMPUS

That doesn't sound tolerant to me

"Liberals" are nothing of the sort. They aren't liberal at all.

They are totalitarians and an existential threat to western civilization.

This is what I thought I was talking to. Some college SJW liberals who only want to tolerate liberals.

But one just said that people who don't think 6 million Jews "or more" died in the concentration camps should be thrown in prison "until they learn the truth".

Oh, I will as long as this thread keeps getting replies.

Anyone got some of those images of things like the Rotherham police getting in trouble for trying to stop the rapes? Or the parents having to be "reeducated" because they didn't want them to become racist after paki's raped their kids?

>The Democratic Party? Would the DNC say Bernie is bad because his crowd is "too white" and "too male" like they've said a million times?
White, maybe, but not male. I would say a majority of his supporters are women, certainly more than Hillary.

Show them this video

youtube.com/watch?v=-Yss1iugyGY

Pretty much. Mostly because their ideas can't stand up to scrutiny.

Tell them hating conservatives isn't tolerant. Tell them to read 1984. Tell them their way of thinking has killed millions. Then tell them to eat shit and suck the business end of a .45.

No, the only reason people are mad at illegal squatters is "ignorance". The only reason people are suspicious of a group that in majority supports religious violence is "ignorance".

The Nazis didn't like an ethnic group too, therefore all considerations of logic or causality are ignorant.

YouTube also singed on to the EU thing last week. They will begin removing "non-tolerant" videos and reporting the uploaders to the authorities in each EU state.

Frank Raymond
When Giants Awaken
Based non-white describes what he likes about white people and condemns CultMarx and what he calls The Sneak-Rulers.

I agree.

Also, white men have also built up an image over the last few centuries: slavery, concentration camps, world war etc.

I think tumblr are right to have a bias against white men.

>leftard defending gimmegrants

You should commit suicide

With Open Gates set a bad precedent. Took literally millions off-narrative. Won't be allowed again.

The left is responsible for Stalin, Mao and Pol Pot, this mean that leftist ideology should be banned and people like you sent to a gulag.

Please hang yourself

The right is responsible for Fascism, Nazism, slavery, colonialism, both World Wars etc.

Kill yourself :)

Nobody on the right of politics believes in tolerance. You believe in tolerance for your opinions and nothing else.

>europarl.europa.eu/meetdocs/2009_2014/documents/libe/dv/11_revframework_statute_/11_revframework_statute_en.pdf

Parts of the EU law that American Liberal SJWs want to copy here:

Section 1: Telling truth does not matter if it speaks ill of a group. If history is not tolerant, you may not use it as a defense about not being tolerant. You may not use history to promote intolerance.

This is why leftists are inherently incompatible with a free society and need to be physically removed.

So to speak.

I hope you get raped you cunty nigger faggot. Free speech for life.

>>europarl.europa.eu/meetdocs/2009_2014/documents/libe/dv/11_revframework_statute_/11_revframework_statute_en.pdf
Section 1.2: You are required by law to accept all groups of people as well as the ways they express themselves as a group.

The right-wing showing their tolerance for others by saying those who have different opinions need to be "physically removed" and "get raped"

I know this Sup Forums but the lack of self-awareness is stunning. Stay mad stormcucks.

>>>europarl.europa.eu/meetdocs/2009_2014/documents/libe/dv/11_revframework_statute_/11_revframework_statute_en.pdf
2e: YOU ARE REQUIRED BY LAW TO BE A FEMINISTS.

This is EU law.

I think the first amendment in this country is taken too far. It seems to do nothing but incite hate.

This guy sums it up pretty well

Doesn't this create a sort of recursive paradox though? Because banning intolerance is in itself an intolerant action of what you perceive as intolerance.

So I say "fuck niggers". Then someone complains to the police and I get arrested for being intolerant of niggers. Then the person who called 911 gets arrested for being intolerant of those who don't like niggers. Then the person who called 911 on the person who called 911 also gets arrested for being intolerant of those who are intolerant of those who hate niggers...

>national socialism and collectivist ideology
>right wing
I can't wait for Muhammed to bring you some "enrichment"

>>>>europarl.europa.eu/meetdocs/2009_2014/documents/libe/dv/11_revframework_statute_/11_revframework_statute_en.pdf
2e you are also, required by law, to be pro-homosexual and accept the holocaust killed at least 6 million Jews.

Side note: 1984 has just been removed from kindle.

The right never claimed to be the ideology of progressive tolerance though.

I don't give a shit about tolerance, I actually belive that fascit didn't killed enough of you...
I also belive that leftards are apes who didn't manage to evolve into proper humans, leftrads are so dumb they can't use logic and are forced to use feelings to explain their delusions

Actually Stalin killed more people than Hitler.

>>>>>europarl.europa.eu/meetdocs/2009_2014/documents/libe/dv/11_revframework_statute_/11_revframework_statute_en.pdf
No. Ther's actually a part of the EU statute for Tolerance that says you do not have to tolerate people who are intolerant.

It's part of section 4f. It says: "There is no
need to be tolerant to the intolerant."

This is EU Law.

Nobody never told here that leftards should be tolerated... In fact nobody care about tolerance nor think it's a vertu of some sort, tolerance is rather a synonymous for decadence.


Go seek a psychiatrist

Aren't you the ones who want to ban Muslims from immigrating to the US?

Everybody want to ban muslims

>>>>>>europarl.europa.eu/meetdocs/2009_2014/documents/libe/dv/11_revframework_statute_/11_revframework_statute_en.pdf
Section 3.3.iii - says that it is the government's job to force each individual to be tolerant, and that the government must go beyond simply forcing businesses and institutions to be tolerant.

>Uneducated fool
Your opinion, disregarded. Friendly reminder, Amazon will deliver toothbrush and toothpaste to your door now. No reason to let those teeth go to pot, English cuck.

I wish my country would have let Hitler walk into your shithole country.

That's both pathetically sad and hilarious at the same time.

Jesus christ, what the fuck.

>>>>>>>europarl.europa.eu/meetdocs/2009_2014/documents/libe/dv/11_revframework_statute_/11_revframework_statute_en.pdf
Section 3: not giving people housing, medical insurance, "social insurance", and freedom to go wherever they want is a form of "intolerence" and therefore is illegal.

Safe place generation

>>>>>>>>europarl.europa.eu/meetdocs/2009_2014/documents/libe/dv/11_revframework_statute_/11_revframework_statute_en.pdf
Section 4: you must tolerate and accept migrants. Not doing so is illegal according to European Union law.

>>>>>>>>>europarl.europa.eu/meetdocs/2009_2014/documents/libe/dv/11_revframework_statute_/11_revframework_statute_en.pdf
section 6 c: the organization that shall oversee "tolerance" is not to be voted on and will have zero oversight. Nobody may question their decisions.

Remember guys... this is EU law.

figure it out, peasant, or ur going to be dead along with all the rest of us

>>>>>>>>>>europarl.europa.eu/meetdocs/2009_2014/documents/libe/dv/11_revframework_statute_/11_revframework_statute_en.pdf
Section 7: totalitarian ideas are outlawed.

Who the fuck gets to decide who is "totalitarian" or not? Isn't this "tolerance" shit totalitarian?

Fuck you plebian. I'm providing something the people want.

>You believe in tolerance for your opinions and nothing else.

Wow, that's legitimately funny.

You realize Orwell wrote 1984 about the left?

It always starts with millenialist notions of a perfect society once you get rid of all the bad thinkers.

Your kind killed tens of millions in the 20th century. Hitler was a drop in the bucket in comparison.

And you'll do it all while you imagine a halo above your head.

>>>>>>>>>>>europarl.europa.eu/meetdocs/2009_2014/documents/libe/dv/11_revframework_statute_/11_revframework_statute_en.pdf
Section 7.b: Juveniles who break these statues will be sent to re-education camps to learn better toleration.

I'm not making that shit up even. EU law demands "re-education camps to teach and instill a culture of tolerance."

Guys... this is the big one. This is according to EU law, and this is what Liberals are now demanding in the United States. This is fucking turning my stomach.

>>>>>>>>>>>>europarl.europa.eu/meetdocs/2009_2014/documents/libe/dv/11_revframework_statute_/11_revframework_statute_en.pdf

Section 8 demands that all media, all television, all books, all magazines, all on-line interactions, all art, and media will promote tolerance. The government is respponsible to make sure this happens and can dole out punishments against those who do not follow orders, or give grants to those who make good art or media that does promote tolerance.

>There is no one more pathetic than the "Muh freeze peach" shills.

I do 100% believe you mean that.

Only correct opinions will be allowed.

this Tolerance law is Totalitarian, no?
google description for Totaliarian is:
>of or relating to a system of government that is centralized and dictatorial and requires complete subservience to the state
look close on this part
>requires complete subservience to the state

Despite all the propaganda, fascists are the left and liberals are the right.

...

>freeze peach
Re.ddit shills aren't even trying to blend in anymore

If you know them name them for freedom.

>>>>>>>>>>>>>europarl.europa.eu/meetdocs/2009_2014/documents/libe/dv/11_revframework_statute_/11_revframework_statute_en.pdf
Section 9 says that a certain percentage (to be determined) of all education, leraning, and media must be to teach tolerance.

Not according to liberals though. Their "version" of totalitarianism is the "good kind".

>should be banned
You've got it wrong. I think they should all be killed. That being said if it's fun enough to kill them we could certainly import more as live game.

>Historically fascist regimes emerge from the left as the left offers the easiest access between the elite and the nation's coffers
>When the regime fails they blame the right by pointing out that said regimes were racist and nationalist which they think is a predominately right wing thing to be
>People fall for it, time passes, history is rewritten and the left power grabs again by citing that all other fascist regimes were right wing because they were racist and nationalist and that socialism has "never been tried" because of said racist nationalists
>Proceed to dip their hands in the coffers
It's like poetry.

>Not according to liberals though. Their "version" of totalitarianism is the "good kind".
I believe we have term for this but name have escaped from my mind.

SRS posters should have their families ground up into liquid, then stuffed in a coffin along with the liquid and buried alive.

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>europarl.europa.eu/meetdocs/2009_2014/documents/libe/dv/11_revframework_statute_/11_revframework_statute_en.pdf
The last bit says that you are not allowed to call this EU law "censorship", since the media groups themselves will do the censorship and not the government itself. Calling the law "censorship" is illegal.

Actually it's a bummer.

We're seeing the shape of the struggle of the first half of the 21st century.

In one sense it's the same old shit - totalitarianism is on the march again, but this time it's in a much more insidious form. No speeches, no invasions. It's just the slow creep of a grey, bureaucratic tumour that consumes dissent.

Populism might be the only answer to it, because they must confront that directly. Populism is the will of the people, expressed. Either they don't answer it at all, or they combat it. Either response shines a light on the real shape of them..

This is an infantile straw man argument. Try again.

"Liberals" in the US are actually the Regressive Left and they stole they term and defiled it.

Okay guys, that's the end of the EU law stuff that I can go over. That's law. That's legally binding "tolerance". And why are no EU people posting in this thread right now?

>I have Liberals right now telling me that the US needs to get rid of Freedom of Speech and institute "Tolerance" laws to make sure that Americans respect each other.

And Trump wants to change the law so he can sue people for libel if they say things he thinks are mean.
And republicans want to ban scientists from talking about climate change.
And conservatives want to ban effective sex ed and replace it with abstinence-only jibberish.
And right-wingers try to make it illegal for schools to even discuss homosexuality in a neutral light.

Yeah, yeah, you poor persecuted right-wing crybabies are huge defending of free speech... selectively. Cry moar, hypocrites.

Wow. None of that shit have I ever heard of... except the homo stuff. But that is more of a "Why do schools need to talk about this at all? They certainly shouldn't be pushing it."

It definiteiy isn't "It should be illegal to mention faggotry".

the choice to use the word tolerance is interesting to say the least
it imply's the choice to ignore something inherently negative

>leave in nipples
>photoshop out pussy

wtf

I had to look for myself but yeah all the free versions are unavailable. Thanks Jews

CP, delete this

Really? Shit. They don't remove them anywhere else. Including this pic from the same shoot from the same girl.


Anyway, anyone have more pictures of "tolerence" and "diversity"?

1. Slander/Defamation is already an offense prosecutable offense.

2. No.. that is entirely false. It smells like shit, like where it came from. Your ass.

3. Only thing republicans seem to be concerned as far as sex goes is keeping men in men's bathrooms and Women's in Women's, that and abortion.

4. citation. never ever heard of such a thing.


WHEREAS. I could list off 100 things liberals/leftists have done to drive the country into the ground, endless double speak, cognitive dissonance, riots, burning down cities for fuck's sake.


Even if all what you said is true, there's a very objectively lesser evil here, and it's not you faggots.

Joseph McCarthy was a Republican

>The last bit says that you are not allowed to call this EU law "censorship"

I actually brought up McCarthieism with the libs I was arguing with... saying that the "no totalitarian" stuff from the "tolerence" laws would mean that Bernie Sanders wouldn't be able to run in the US because it was classified as "totalitarian".

This brought them back to saying that all conservatism should be outlawed and that only liberals should be able to hold office.

In the name of "divercity and tolerance of others".

I'm intolerant of Islamic intolerance, sorry.

Also, sorry to say, but the freedom and tolerance legally afforded to US citizens applies solely to US citizens. We are not a one world nation. You can shove your globalist tripe elsewhere.

Not to mention, no one is trying to legally prevent you from calling people shitlords, that would be a violation of your free speech. They're just trying to prevent you from doing the reverse.

Best indeed.

Liberals are a cult bent on instituting their version of morality to replace conventional morality. The goal is removal of personal responsibility and the eventual destruction of functional society. They will render everyone retarded and the state will "care" for them. Total state control.

Dear German, who pretty much is the head of the EU because every other country there sucks and lives off your German economy.

Can you please explain this EU law about "Tolerance" shit?
This is law over you. What the fuck duetsch-bro.

>Can you please explain this EU law about "Tolerance" shit?
What? I just came into the thread, but if it sounds like it is out of 1984 it's probably true.

>tolerance of the inalienable right to free speech
>tolerance of the illegal presence of subversive cocksuckers who have zero business even being here in the first place
>thinking these are the same thing

Wait... you came into the thread just to look at some girl's butt and didn't even realize we were talkingg about the "forced tolerance law" that apparently is over the entire EU?

I really don't remember which asses/tits I've posted yet. Shit.

EU is authoritarian cancer, nothing new, they will pay some day.
I'm going to bed.

Heinrich are you ok? Are you basically on autopilot at this point waiting for Europe's pain to end?