Who was in the wrong here?

Who was in the wrong here?

GOd was aka the creator

I was thinking about this movie a while back, but I couldn't remember the name. What was it?

I remember that kid made me feel like such a bitch, I mean he listened to Led Zeppelin when he was like 13.

I remember playing the playstation game for hours, the multiplayer arena was awesome.

Small Soldiers

Little privates

The guy who put munitions chips in toys.

Mini colonels

Wee warriors

fucking kekaroonie

definitely a movie about the MELANOID DEFICIENT "man" THAN LOL!

...

>yfw archer and bros will eventually power-down somewhere out in the middle of the woods and they'll be slowly dying as their battery drains and they won't know why

Tiny Troops

Crazy Commandos

Miniscule Military

We all die, m8. How's it any different from age?

Toy soldiers.

Inanimate Combatants

That kid was a species traitor. No better than the wheelchair dude from Avatar

You can't handle the Rodeo Burger

Petite platooners

Feature-length Commercial

Mini musketeers

Lilliputian Legionnaires.

Kek'd

Belittled brigade

What was the conflict over? I recall siding with the military because the others had weak voices and no direction in life. military toy just found out he is a toy and his life is a lie but he got his shit together and is on his way to taking over the world. as for their fictional conflict than I side with the military (same as in avatar)

Best one

kid was pro his species. toy men are not the same as real men

Runty recruits

...

Bite-sized brigadiers

short sentries

best ones were Nick Nitro and Brick Bazooka. Gorgonites had way cooler toys though

Favourite gorgonite? Punch-it masterrace. Slam-fist is a very close second.

diminutive draftsmen

They were all faggots. The soldiers should have won to teach kids a lesson about the real world.

Implying it wasn't insaniac, whose had a torso that could lift up and allow him to go into spin-mode.

Also, Flatchoo was /ourguy/

This is the only one that didn't look like complete shit

Why was flatchoo such an outcast? He had like 1 scene in the movie and wasn't even in the pc game. I had his action figure too for some fucked up reason.

Idk, i guess because his name was a combination of boogers and farts and he looked like volcano shrek, not exactly hero material

Archer looked pretty good, but he was generic hero man so he wasn't cool

Far right looks like Sadistic Wojack.

>not exactly hero material
Definitely /our guy/ then

Microscopic Marshals

>What was the conflict over?

It was their programming as toys to hate each other.

Im not seeing it

yeah but I mean in the in universe fictional story that they came from. it was something like avatar, right?

I hate the fact that I have to share this planet with people like you.

Compressed Conscripts

elaborate. would you really side with the navi?

Diminutive Marines

Unendowed Units

>you never got special microchips that would bring your toys to life

The idiot who programed the dolls to destroy each other instead of an elaborate hide and seek plus wrestling.

I guess he thought doll killing would support long term sales.

Weren't the chips military or something too? Been ages since I've seen it.

no one was really in the wrong in this movie.

Gil Mars

The disgusting mutie scum were in the wrong, for existing.

What do you mean?

>Why root for the Humans in Avatar?

Humanity needed Unobtainium to survive, ppl were starving back home.

So not only were the Mercs correct on strictly Utilitarian grounds (Earth population > Na'vi population), but they were doing what was needed for their OWN PEOPLE, who in their eyes SHOULD come first (unless your a cuck like Jake or that Ripley woman).

Add to that that the superstitious and uncooperative Na'vi were impeding the human mining efforts even though the loss of Unobtainium was not a matter of life and death for them (it was more a matter of the 'sanctity' of their forest) and they become even less sympathetic.

Granted that the Na'vi and humans did not have a very good dialogue set up, so that the Na'vi were mostly in the dark on some issues, but the fact is that time was running out on negotiations, because Earth was suffering and its a long trip home for these humans.

They gave the Avatar program a good shot, but once it started going off the rails it was WAY past time - they had to intervene militarily.

The fact is that the onus was actually on the leaders of the NA'VI to come to some sort of agreement, since they had vastly less power and more to lose if it came to an armed conflict.

Instead they showed nothing but animal contempt for mankind, with the film implying that they were at least partly under the control of the Planet-scale Pandora organism.

So in the end its one being (Pandora), trying to horde its Unobtainium (which it can't fucking use) from the billions of humans who desperately need that resource, and refusing to even negotiate properly, even though it has zero means of effective resistance against the full scale of human military power. Instead it uses its peons to stage a religious war.

Pandora is - at best - committing suicide by cop. At worst, it is genocidally anti-human.

Pretty fucking obvious who to root for.


>pic not related

Why are you replying to me?

It was their planet you dipshit.
If aliums came to earth spouting your bullshit you'd be singing a different fucking tune.

Manlet Mercenaries

>It was their planet you dipshit.
>ownership existing beyond the bounds of being able to legitimize it through force

True cuck.

Fucking kek

>It was their planet you dipshit

Right, but if you take the Tragedy of the Commons approach (ie "Get the fuck away from my stuff you filthy starving hobo!") then you're essentially committing to 'might makes right', which is is fine in my book, and should actually make you support the humans, who were by far the stronger party, and were only negotiating etc to be nice.

Your point supports my argument, essentially.

I meant to put in as well.

is a massive cuck and probably #WithHer

yes you dumb shit. When you are part of X side you should side with your own people. also if aliums wanted to trade technology and some of their other stuff for metal I had no use for yes I would trade even if they had to blow up mount rushmore to get to it.

>yes I would trade even if they had to blow up mount rushmore to get to it
>yes I would let a nigger bang my wife if he was bigger and stronger than me
>but if you side with the navi or the gorgonites you're a cuck
rly makes u think

are you retarded? how is blowing up mount rushmore same as giving away my wife?

Bad Company

Letting a foreign body have dominance over your property is pretty fucking pathetic.

lmao

Guys we're having a cool naming stuff thread over here, could you stop ruining it with your Sup Forums projectile vomit?

atomic armada

Im not letting foreign body have dominance over my property. Im letting them trade me some of their goods for a resources that is useless to me, even if it means destroying/ moving a sacred monument

>cool
micro bros is not really cool

Micro Machines

AY YO IMMA GIV YO 50 DOLLA TO GIVE YO WIFE MA BBC

IF U DON IMMA FUCK U UP GOOD HOMIE YA DIG?

>o-o-okay mr large black man

Now that im redpilled I see it was just multicultural agenda pushing

more like
>can I take your lawn mower for $20,000
>sure

When you are redpilled everything is multicultural agenda

>Humanity needed unobtanium to survive
No they didn't, they needed to continue their current way of life
>Mercs correct on strictly Utilitarian grounds
It is demonstrated throughout the movie that the Na'vi can teach a more sustainable way oflife,and thus killing them is a terrible move
>even though the loss of Unobtainium was not a matter of life and death for them
The unobtanium is concentrated at sites that hold the consciousness of their dead, destroying these sites is basically genocide
>They gave the Avatar program a good shot, but once it started going off the rails it was WAY past time - they had to intervene militarily.
Just as it was showing fruition, but they were uncomfortable with it's findings
> onus was actually on the leaders of the NA'VI to come to some sort of agreement, since they had vastly less power and more to lose if it came to an armed conflict.
except it came to an armed conflict and they won
>Instead they showed nothing but animal contempt for mankind, with the film implying that they were at least partly under the control of the Planet-scale Pandora organism.
They show contempt after aggression and it is never implied they are under the control of some hive mind

Problem Child 2

the darkie

A little army?!?

Agree on all counts, pretty much.

inadequate infantrymen

It was the white devil actually.

MINE'S GIZMO

infinitesimal insurgents