This was some true Libtardation...

This was some true Libtardation, I just hope reform doesn't happen just because a bunch of High Schools Fags walked outside of class. Especially when 2% of these kids can't even vote yet

Attached: image000000_06~2.png (1440x1571, 1.73M)

Other urls found in this thread:

merriam-webster.com/dictionary/militia
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Girandoni_air_rifle
twitter.com/SFWRedditVideos

Can actually vote*

Attached: a782d29771f02afe1c4600bf48f82b2f.png (272x255, 109K)

it would take a lot for them to totally over turn the second amendment. I don't think any of them understand that that demand it. It would take senate and rep majority, president approval, supreme court approval, and then 3/4 of the states have to agree on it. The bill of rights is no joke, it isn't just like any other law or the rest of the constitution. these people are retarded is all

>calls for reform.
>doesn't even know the current laws.

/thread, neither do they understand that there is already gun control laws. if the FBI would have done their job and flagged Cruz after the shit ton of reports they got on him. He wouldn't have been able to buy a gun, so right there. the government can't even enforce the current ones and they want more. just so fuckin braindead

Fake news

Attached: 52C5CF49-FD8C-4429-9431-8FB14C0C61AE.jpg (750x836, 203K)

"Gun violence has its roots in racism and bigotry."

Lol what? Gun violence has its roots in inner-city niggers murdering each other then getting famous rapping about it.

fuckin keks, the Hitler dubs just perfects it

This reminds me a lot of something Jordan Peterson said in a lecture about why he thinks that activism like this is useless.

It is like a drug, it makes you feel good when you do it, but then what? They have done nothing but waste hundreds of man hours on gathering and chanting at people who neither care about their opinion nor have the power to grant their wishes. Effecting change in society takes time, effort and determination the likes of which will consume a man entirely and you have to be ready to dedicate your entire life to doing something to make any sort of permanent change. This is why activism in general is so dangerous, it gets the restless parts of society together so they can get it all out of their system and at the end of the day they can pat themselves on the back and feel good about themselves. Look at these kids in the picture, they look so pleased making their statements and holding their signs but just take a minute and ask yourself one question.

What are they going to do tomorrow?

Tomorrow they are going to go back to their schools and feel good about themselves and eventually forget about that day they went out and rebelled against "The Man". Some of them might find another cause to champion for awhile, some might just get laid and forget they ever wanted to protest, a few others might just dedicate their life to solving "the problem", but in the end all this is just feeding a massive circle-jerk where people with hate and angst in their heart and a need to progress towards something, have someone to look at and call a nazi.

Why the fuck are other high school kids so retarded

I never heard any of them mention revoking the 2nd amendment. Wanting common sense control i.e "Well Regulated Militia" is not the same as repealing.

Except people are doing what they can to remove existing safeguards already. One safeguard that could have prevented this was repealed by Trump executive order.

Just take a moment and appreciate how these people are going to be the new workforce.

Yes it is. Owning a gun was always intended to be a prerequisite for joining a militia, not the other way around. The intent was always for citizens to own guns, and form militias if they wanted to or events required it. What you are proposing is absolutely unconstitutional.

muh rights, 2nd amendtmtnt cant be changed!!!

jesus, I hope all fucking americans shoot eachother into exctinction, they like to pretend as if their laws were made by some kind of god and are perfect and cannot be changed

No it's not. Anyone that has a gun is a member of a de facto militia. As such requirements such as training, registration, and licensing is within the scope of federal powers.

i was just thinking it was probably him

And there we have our evidence. This asshole isn't an American, but thinks he knows what's best for us. I don't tell your country how to govern itself, how about you extend the same courtesy?

Do you know what a militia is in this context? I don't think you do. Cite your sources.

well, they can't be changed, that is the point soy boy

Attached: 1487731078065.jpg (539x720, 60K)

there's a process for amending the constitution. it's been done a couple dozen times. gun grabbers are welcome to go down that road, but what they can't do it an administrative end run around the bill of rights, which it what they're doing (there's nowhere near the support required to change the 2nd amendment itself)

eat shit you swedish fucking faggot

this. they think the founding fathers were thinking of weapons 1000x more advanced when writing the constitution.

>2% of these kids can’t even vote yet

Did you mean that ONLY 2% of them CAN vote, or do you seriously misunderstand how old high schoolers are? Or what voting age is? Or both?

Do you? If you are thinking of the contemporary notion of a non-aligned military group e.g. anti-government militias that had been in the news a few years ago that is not what it means.

pretty sure they were, since resisting a tyrannical government was one of the express purposes of the 2nd, and that obviously requires access to similar firepower

And retards like you are stupid enough to think they believed that all technical innovation stopped in 1750.

They can be, that's why we have amendments. We had an amendment to repeal prohibition that was part of a previous amendment.

Cite your sources.

At the time of the founders, they could not possibly envision a communication medium like the internet. Therefore, free speech should exist on the internet.

Look, I can make stupid arguments about historical context too~!

No, just that they couldn't perceive the kinds of weapons that we have now.

bro just wants to bang a fatty, leave him out of it

should not*
fuck i cant type today

Its as if this nigga forgets that pucket guns existed in 1722

merriam-webster.com/dictionary/militia

Also:
United States v. Miller (1939), the Supreme Court ruled that the Second Amendment did not protect weapon types not having a "reasonable relationship to the preservation or efficiency of a well regulated militia".[
Granted, Heller V DC revised that, but I firmly believe that it was mistake and should be revisited.

Yes it can be, but it sets such a dangerous precedent that I don't believe ANY amount of lost lives would justify it. What goes next? 4? 9? 10? Maybe they'll just grab straight for 1?
The day the Second Amendment gets altered or repealed is the first day of the beginning of the end of the United States of America.

>pucket guns
You mean the Puckle gun? It may have existed back then, but how well known was it? How widely was it used?

ITT: Everyone forgets the 2nd amendment says "The right to bare arms" It does not specify small arms, just arms. Our gods the Fore-Fathers wanted us to have everything and anything we could afford, right down to the main guns on a battleship.

If a man so had the means and the will to own a 16" main cannon off a decommissioned Iowa class battleship I say let him.

well since militias are for fighting armed battles against military groups, just what type of weapon is excluded under that quote? wmds maybe.

yeah i don't see the "only the weapons that existed in 1776" crowd defending the right to own the huge cannons on battleships of the time

Attached: 1517036612119.png (443x479, 231K)

In terms of modern firepower it would really be irrelevant. No amount of personal firepower can stop something like F-22 Raptor firing missiles from 3500 feet.

People do own some of those. Collectors.

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Girandoni_air_rifle

Almost as if they don't like the possibility of being shot.

You can stop an F-22 raptor from firing that missile before it ever leaves the ground, attack the supply line, fuel or munitions factories. Hell you could even go after the airframe mechanics.

Fuckin A dude. I just found myself a goal in life, but I want the whole damned ship, I think we should recommission the Missouri for a coastal militia capital ship.

Attached: 1441219768560.jpg (3000x1998, 1.53M)

Now you are getting into battlefield strategy and logistics. If the federal government were to go rogue and initiate first strike there would be no opportunity to stop them on the tarmac.

>If the federal government were to go rogue and initiate first strike there would be no opportunity to stop them on the tarmac.

which is why the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan only lasted a few months each right?

Again, logistics. Any strike at home could involve attacks launched from multiple points around the country. Here in the US there are tens of thousands of aircraft, armament, etc that could be used. What we have overseas is minuscule compared to that.

Not the user you replied to but I'm butting in. I don't think we'd have much advance notice of incoming artillery but jets wouldn't be of much use on infantry, I'd expect blackhawks or similar. Regardless, still not likely to be used in a guerilla civil war beyond recon, killing citizens enmasse would be a PR nightmare for the government and a dream come true for anarchists.

>tfw nobody checking my battleship trips

Attached: 1489337890115.gif (460x313, 1.73M)

Attached: eb0.jpg (500x500, 40K)

>Any strike at home could involve attacks launched from multiple points around the country.

you mean exactly what fucking happened in Iraq and Afghanistan.

>Here in the US there are tens of thousands of aircraft, armament, etc that could be used.

and? just because you have first strike doesn't mean that you'll eliminate your enemy. hell NATOs strategy against Russia and China kind of relies on that fact.

additionally your scenario assumes that everyone in the military will carry out aforementioned strikes as ordered, without any resistance whatsoever.

Attached: 1518719928183.jpg (1007x748, 739K)

>0 real world experience
>think their opinion has any validity at all

fuck off randy

no u

NO! U!

Attached: 1499903590215.gif (500x500, 198K)

>live in east coast
>30 degrees outside
>libtards decide to go outside
>5 min they go inside
>tfw you stayed inside and did something more productive

Attached: 20170424-4O1GHDF3vyAAcQfG8B1r.jpg (1280x1290, 119K)

antiaircraft batteries and other f-22 raptors could stop one. we should be able to own those too.

How did the United States become a country where people march in the streets that the government restrict their freedom?

Attached: 0952E40A-7316-411B-82D9-DB79085C8EC1.jpg (750x616, 174K)

It's most people over 21 who are saying that, not 16 year olds. 2/10 for the reply.

Attached: 1517532874101.jpg (554x527, 23K)

And how widely are the legally purchased and licensed "assault weapons" that all this legislation is aimed at actually used in instances of gun violence? Very very rarely.

Gotta b8 harder ATF

Attached: Really_Cool_Pic.png (211x301, 77K)

Here is a britfag who applauded his sand nigger mayor for banning people from his country for being Christians...oh I mean terrorists.

Because a government restricting the rights and freedom of the citizens always results in utopia, right?

So all the kids who skipped high school today based on that message are 21?
0/10 for not using basic logic.

why aren't you fighting against the regulation of tide pods?

Utopia based on the Greek root utopos means “no place” or “no where”.
Actions directed towards achieving utopia will never result in utopia.

Because there’s no amendment referring to the right and protection of tide pods

Are you trying to be stupid?

>Literally nothing wrong with allowing the purchase of personal firearms at 21 instead of 18
>tfw any person without prior convictions can walk into a gun store and buy one despite not being trained to use it
Yet training is not a requirement. Why?

Attached: newfag.jpg (640x400, 106K)

Go read the federalist papers and learn how wrong your revisionist interpretation of the second amendment is.

>Yet training is not a requirement. Why?

what, like safety training?

Basic safety and range time.

>Literally nothing wrong with allowing the purchase of personal firearms at 21 instead of 18
Except for the fact that you’re denying that age range between 18 and 21 (legal adults) their 2nd amendment right which is illegal, hence lawsuits.

>Basic safety and range time.

probably because each gun has a different set of safety features and specifications, in regards to the safety thing. how would range time decrease the likelihood gun related fatalities?

there is though. they have the right to decide on their design. to regulate that is government tyranny.

It is required for conceal and carry jackass. Not to buy one for home defense to stay only on that property inside the house.

I think they were suggesting a change, not forcing. But okay, call everything a fascist like every other normie.

i bet you don't even think gun regulation is genocide, you fucking libtard.

Why not also make porn (getting into or owning) 21. Hell why not 25. Since the human brain doesnt stop developting until 25-27

Hell why not make the age of consent 25 too. I mean if you cant own guns now until legal drinking age then why not just make every adult right be when your mind is fully developed.

With parent/guardian signature and proper documents a 15 year old should be able to own certain weapons. 18 would lift the parents being needed. But still full background checks. 21 shouldnt change shit

It won't be illegal when we raise the legal age of adulthood to 21.

A lot of gun-related fatalities are safety related accidents, it's a precautionary measure.

WEW. Not even what I'm speaking of.

Added to You can buy a dirt bike and drive it legally with no cdl at your property, but you cannot buy a Harley and drive it on the highway with no cdl. It’s the same basic concept.

A dirt bike is a strictly off-road vehicle. Apples and oranges user, I get what you're going for but it's not the same.

I can't tell if you're pro or opposed to to gun control

>Voted trump.
>10 year nra member
>lifelong gun advocate
>Made fun of you for calling things fascist
But I’m the perceived libtard

Why not make it 27 then?

Does your illiterate ass know I’m for gun rights? Jesus fuck kid. Stop sperging and comprehend something.

A gun bought for non conceal and carry use is strictly for home defense. Don’t think so hard.

fuck off libnazi. fight for the pod or kys.

Also want to stop gun crime

1: Already happening. I know CNN wants you to think 100000 babies are being AR15nd but gun murder has gone done. So has voilent crime

2: Stop promoting single parents and cheap hookups. Most shooters. (Or bad people) come from homes with no father. Maybe tell women to pick better men and not just looks (Yes you can actually find a 20/10 looking guy who also has morals and values. Omg. Its almost a fucking miracle)

3: Force weapon training to any gun owner. It would be free to anyone in the NRA and would go over everything from terms. Trigger disipline. Laws. Safety

4: Any police dept who ignores signs of a voilent person should be heavily punished. 30+ warnings.....

5: Cruz wasnt put on lists due to some cucked up obama leftist "law" that made kids safe from being put on lists due to "?muh blacks being held back" (yes its a real thing. And yes it was meant for black youth)

6: Keep the goverment far away from kids and people in general. Only thing the governent should do is making sure nobody is fucked with and making sure the right laws are being used

Attached: ahh.jpg (1071x808, 323K)

Personally, I think full legalization of the consumption of Tide pods needs to happen.
After a couple months there won't be anyone left alive that's fucking dumb enough to eat Tide pods.

Exactly