Are there any legitimate arguments for letting women vote or all they all muh feels?

Are there any legitimate arguments for letting women vote or all they all muh feels?

Other urls found in this thread:

youtube.com/watch?v=YruxhWO8QSY
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Assemblywomen
twitter.com/NSFWRedditGif

all muh feels

I can see the importance of it if you live in an oppressive theocracy but other than that it's all muh feels.

For that matter, is there any reason to let blatantly retarded trolls that post on /pol vote? Or OP faggots?

Or people to vote in general, other than to give them the illusion of choice?

Are there any legitimate arguments for letting anyone vote or are they all muh feels?

lel at this weak attempt at derailing

roasties getting toasty lmao

found the sjw

Is she white or do I have jungle fever?

That's my kind of woman.

They have cognitive abilities approximating male abilities and they have a vested interest in the future. Also, at least for Americans, you have the whole issue of taxation without representation.

If there's any women that have something at stake (like property or businesses) I see nothing against it.

Same with men. NEETs shouldn't be able to vote.

Why am I so attracted to light brown girls?

Gas the neets

go back to sargon kido

>i don't understand how the election works therefore it is an illusion

becuase they are like me

>falling for the forced jewish meme of feminism
>being this pathetic of a meme soldier
We may need to make a bootcamp for th meme militia

>Jews BTFOing british men in the Meme War by using the feminist meme

This is World War Meme: The Battle for Gender roles

>They have cognitive abilities approximating male abilities

For men who know how to actually be the head of their house, it means that they get twice as many votes.

But for nu-males, it means the "I are womyn 'n' we is stronk!" get twice as many votes...

So basically but much has changed, it just inflates the votes one way or another. Unfortunately, the rise of the nu-male and war on masculinity ensures the imbalance

Margaret fatcher was a conservative
KKK for women surprisingly had far right women voters

They vote for socialism and are ruining the world.

Just look at Canada.

The average IQ is about the same

Of course you can cherry pick anything, but averages are what matter. Bottom line is that women as a group always vote farther left than men.

The ability to control the destiny of the state comes from willingness and ability to protect it.

Women generally lack the former and all of them lack the latter. Women also vote based on short-term gains which is why they've wracked up national debt through their control of the state similar to the way they do with family credit cards.

...

they have no group loyalty and are driven by emotions.

They pay taxes, they should vote.

Once you begin discriminating which citizens can vote, it fundementally destroys the idea of democracy. If women are too stupid to vote, then why not poor people? If poor people are too stupid to vote, then why not government employees only? Then the government simply has absolute power and the whole thing collapses.

Sure, when it's measured on kids when girls have a developmental advantage over boys.

youtube.com/watch?v=YruxhWO8QSY

why are women hobbies always baking, reading, sowing, and other waste of time shit?

This girl is Indian if she doesn't smell like curry then I'd make babies with her.

It's incredible as I've gotten older and becoming more and more red-pilled to see just how fucking bonkers women are. Virtually all women are self-centers idiots who will do literally anything to serve their interests.

From the beginning, the US discriminated on who could vote and it didn't collapse. In fact, restricted voting rights kept the size of government in check for like 100 years. If it wasn't for women, a lot of the problems the US has today wouldn't exist.

Shitposting is a much more sophisticated pasttime

kek

Most of them derive from house chores and reading used to be the only "entertainment" you had before TV.
But what boggles my mind is that you can be an avid reader (like a lot of women still are) and still not retain any intelligence from it...

>implying thats all I do

Hold up faggot. Reading is a wonderful hobby and can really make you think (no seriously).

>reading is a waste of time

You can't possibly believe this

There is: zionism

Pure coincidence. Drink your fluoride water goy.

>Producing food is a waste of time
>Producing garments is a waste of time

Remember that "50 Shades of Grey" is a book, and counts as reading.

Without sowing there would be no crop in the Fall.

Well politics affect women so it's natural according to democratic and egalitarian principle that women should be allowed to vote. Are you dumb or something?

Only feels.

Votes should be based on families, not on individual people.

One vote per family

Sup Forums hates sargon, filthy SJW kike

Easy to disguise blemishes, imperfections, and other perceivable topological signs of bad health. It's basically camouflage against your brain's innate quality mate radar.

The important difference is: they do not mature, they stay on child level maturity wise. Beside that they are illoyal cunts.

The only arguments for voting *to begin with* are much feels, but women are most definitely the most egregious examples.

All democracies throughout history have inevitably cannibalized themselves within the space of 2 or 3 centuries (long enough for both the founding stock, and those who remember the founding stock to die), but looking at the historical records, the points where a society allows female emancipation greatly intensify and accelerate the dysfunctional transformation.

There's something people don't understand if you vote with muh feels.

Eventually your civilization will fall. It may take 100-200 years, but it's the beginning of the end unless you bring back reason.

Who knows? We don't have all the answers.

The greeks knew da shet
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Assemblywomen

Our original reason for not allowing women to vote was that votes were to represent an entire household. The man would take into consideration the opinion of his spouse and any children old enough to grasp the politics of the vote before casting his vote--much like the electoral college system we have now but in a much more micro-scale.

I think allowing women to vote is a legitimate thing to do, as the family values and focus on the nuclear family has waned into the current system of independent women and men waiting until their thirties to get married and extended their adolescence into their 20s. I think that, if we were to remove women's right to vote, we would need to raise the age required to vote to make sure women are getting a voice through their spouse. Today's youth would never allow this, despite our brains not being fully formed until ~25.