If anything, they're underrated, because a huge majority of their fans and all of their detractors are incapable to recognize how remarkable their musicianship and songwriting was. So many of the people I know IRL that claim to be "into music" aren't even passingly familiar with their catalog. I think it's because of the popular rock of the 60s and 70s that so many people irl and here associate them with. Just look at all the people that unironically think that a band as terrible as The Kinks were better than the Beatles, but since they don't have that image association, people use the Kinks to fill that void.
Xavier Clark
>beatles start making more intelligent music >this means they hate women Its honestly funny that she's basically implying all women are brainlets
They're extremely popular, but only on a surface level to a lot of people, the majority of their "fans" haven't really delved into their deep cuts, which is true about most bands honestly
Jose Jackson
>transformed the Beatles from being a band teenager girls could enjoy to 'respectable art'
this has to be satire. this makes the feminists look irrationally misandristic, not the beatles irrationally misogynistic
Jose Thomas
The Beatles were from the beginning very interesting musically speaking, you very rarely have a dull song from them in terms of music, and they were great musicians in terms of how the band as a whole interacted - hell, Ringo has a particularly distinctive drumming style when he's the worst member technically speaking, and that's bloody difficult to pull off. The way they kept innovating and bringing experimental stuff to pop music when they were on top of the world is very impressive. Pretty much every musician spoke highly of them.
Jason Jenkins
that's a strange conclusion for the lady in the pic to come to, since that's their album that rocks the least and sounds the faggiest.