Sup Forums, why do so many people cuck themselves by supporting the democratic party? Serious answers only...

Sup Forums, why do so many people cuck themselves by supporting the democratic party? Serious answers only, I'm genuinely confused.

Attached: cuck.png (2000x1950, 93K)

Other urls found in this thread:

youtube.com/watch?v=YfxDhNysSpg
usnews.com/opinion/articles/2016-10-06/why-the-economy-does-better-under-democrats
youtu.be/x55kAJn6-3U
mediabiasfactcheck.com/us-news-world-report/
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Theodore_Roosevelt#Domestic_policies
history.com/topics/us-presidents/theodore-roosevelt
theauthoritarians.org/about/
theauthoritarians.org/options-for-getting-the-book/
twitter.com/NSFWRedditVideo

Most are naive and think they still stand for fairness, logic and equality. That ended a few years ago and went nuclear after Trump.

The education system has flipped to empower girls at the expense of boys, resulting in a generation of women with hyper-inflated egos and a generation of men who are pussy-whipped into going along with their delusions.

Affiliating yourself with any political party is for cucks. It's fine to say you mostly agree with one party or another, but anyone with a brain votes for candidates, not parties.

Probably because we've been winning so much with Trump, we're all just sick of winning. I mean, talk about all the meaningful change he has made in the lives of those of us who are not billionaires, wow. I just am so tired of winning all day long that I must support the democratic party. And like wow, Mitch McConnell has totally been bringing home the bacon. It isn't like Kentucky is the home to 3 of the top 10 poorest counties in the United States. Yup, just sick of winning.

This

And what about people that dedicate political views to be a personality trait?

Attached: corallll the cuck.jpg (600x615, 39K)

> cuck cuck cuck train wall cuck maga coat cuck libtard cuck

>Hillary would've been a good president gais, stop laughing :(

Attached: kekekek.png (3889x2333, 264K)

name one liberal that isn't the polar opposite of masculine
>lesbians dont count

Attached: aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaayyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyy.jpg (600x528, 37K)

most people that identify as republican--the way i do--simply don't give a fuck about wimpy bitch ass society and don't need to try to look like a caring SJW to keep friends, get laid, get hugs, etc. i'm a man. there are many "republicans" that do it because they're trash in a cultish group scene they adhere to, but not the majority of "conservatives" are like that; they just hate silly experimentation and bitch ass feelings of the left wing.

democrats, on the other hand, are... what i already described.

youtube.com/watch?v=YfxDhNysSpg

Since the eighties the American populace has had the cognitive state of their minds altered to value comfort, humanity and safety over freedom, liberty and duty.
This isn’t exclusive to the Democrats however

Attached: 9B73B449-A0B4-4C1A-8B59-4574ACEA34B8.png (960x504, 33K)

because most people vote their wallets and democrats are better for that.
1.) under democrats you will pay less taxes under a certain wage bracket, under trump we end up paying more because people like the rich end up paying less
2.) Some companies love when democrats are charge because they know poor people will have more money to buy their crap.

OMGGG you are so totally right. Wow, I bow to your superior intelligence. You are probably sick of winning too. We just won soooooo much I feel like ponies and unicorns are coming out of my cornhole. So much winning can't take it no moar.

Attached: Yup I'm a bad ass alright.jpg (640x480, 75K)

Attached: theodore-roosevelt.jpg (1200x675, 105K)

>be me
>live in liberal washington
>the knd of cucks that did the school walkout area
>yeah
>those kids
>80% of the guys at my school are the polar opposite of masculine
>haven't even seen guns in their life
>for their anti gun posters they pry googled "ass alt(right) rifle"
>this isnt even a greentext
>this is my life

usnews.com/opinion/articles/2016-10-06/why-the-economy-does-better-under-democrats

democrat=/=liberal

>opinion

Attached: stupid fish.jpg (160x160, 8K)

Well the democrats have been running on the “le socialism meme” since Woodrow Wilson. They control the many institutions of information, like the media, learning, entertainment. Ted Kazinsky actually noted how the left would control people with technology. And the democrats also run on a platform of victimhood which is easy to use for their mob rule.

no true scotsman fallacy

Roosevelt was a Republican

man North Korea is sure still riding our asses with those nuke threats huh

too bad we didn't have a frail old liberal woman to deal with that scenario, she would've used her woman power on ol' stubby

I ask that question all the time

That's the party platform mate.

You also need to repeat soy about 12 fucking times

youtu.be/x55kAJn6-3U

Attached: 1522208755568.jpg (630x630, 22K)

everything is a fallacy fallacy

>when your best political meme is the equivalent of mocking your friend's laughter after they roast you

Attached: cunt.jpg (960x960, 85K)

>Using the unabomber as a source for anything

Attached: Ice Cubically.jpg (480x514, 25K)

How is what he said not true. Sure he killed people. But for the sake of his argument.

mediabiasfactcheck.com/us-news-world-report/

hmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm

Stalin was probably right about some shit too, but using him as a source in an argument is tying your laces together, find someone reputable that says the same thing.

repubtard baiting

>Stalin was probably right
found the nigger on welfare

Attached: stupid yyyy.jpg (320x320, 14K)

Here friend, let me provide you with a link to a reputable source on the life of Theodore Roosevelt: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Theodore_Roosevelt#Domestic_policies

He was an enemy of corporate America, passionate about regulating out-of-control oligarchs, and was a big fan of higher taxes on the rich. No wonder the economy was exploding when he was president!

Oh, and check out his election map. Only the ultraconservative south was voting against him...

This is why.

Attached: 1500393872835.jpg (850x800, 148K)

>this guy started the process of eliminating monopolies which helped the economy, so therefore I can apply this to a political argument generations later with completely different context and zero corporational monopolies

Attached: 1512190604599.jpg (676x858, 51K)

I was obviously using him as a broken clock metaphor, you baiting shitdick.

now that's a politician I can support

Attached: schlumpth.jpg (600x450, 36K)

>baiting shitdick

Attached: Helen Keller.jpg (700x369, 35K)

Republicans only care about identity politics and don't give a shit about policy or governance

>There are moderately politically minded people on my side but not on the other side

You might not be the even headed guy you think you are.

Also if you call yourself a Republican and you're not already a millionaire you're literally retarded. Conservative viewpoints are one thing, but the American party is gutter trash.

Certainly his policies were the very definition of Progressive Liberalism (Trust-busting, conservationism, food quality regulations, workers' rights, etc.) but he was still a Republican, even if only in name.

Regardless of that, this faggot asked for a liberal who isn't the polar opposite of masculine. It's hard to imagine a person of any political creed more masculine than TR, who once dove off of a horse to knife a cougar to death.

This is a clearly well researched and formulated political opinion.

>zero corporational monopolies

> corporational monopolies

> corporational

I thought that was the democrats.

>>There are moderately politically minded people on my side but not on the other side
>Also if you call yourself a Republican and you're not already a millionaire you're literally retarded

>mediabiasfactcheck.com/us-news-world-report/
>Left-center factual reporting: HIGH
>Notes: U.S. News & World Report is an American media company that publishes news, opinion, consumer advice, rankings, and analysis. It is lightly biased toward the left, but generally very reliable for information.

Thanks for linking this fam

>attacking phrasing instead of the argument because you know you're wrong
>you know you're wrong
>you're wrong

>Too stupid to understand the difference between parties and ideologies

brainlette

Jobs created under Trump so far per month: 216k

Same time last presidency under obama: 186k

>muh republicans bad munnee

>Whereas I'll just make asinine and groundless statements with no regard to the contemporary truths of oligarchic monopolists running our global economy in a feigned voice of the other person and fake it like I have actually constructed a lucid argument.

>Too stupid to formulate a decent argument without tripping over yourself

cringe

anyone far to end of the party line always typically are

>oh shit im wrong better grab the dictionary nigga

Higher than Obama's last month, but still lower than Obama's high months. At no point has trump beaten out obama's high months.

Try again

i wanna see the poll of how many republicans vs. democrats get laid

Attached: 1500526819207.jpg (250x191, 6K)

Yeah, but you see pal, the difference there was that Obama was repairing a broken economy at this point in time, while Trumpkin has been busy destroying a functional economy.

>high months mean more than median months
>I got more money than Bill Gates this month because I won the lottery, therefore I am better than Bill Gates

try again

>repairing a broken economy
>less people have jobs
>therefore harder to create jobs
>more potential
>less output
>logic

or maybe I just have a better vocabulary than you do.

Attached: butthurt young skywalker.jpg (320x218, 12K)

I would if the JFK era ever made a comeback.
most of my family have been democrats since FDR.
they all sat out on the election. probably haven't voted since Clinton.

Before the Southern Strategy, both Democrats and Republicans had liberal and conservative wings. Hyperpartisanship only really manifested in the 70s and 80s.

Looks like a case of Nu Normal Tourette Syndrome... Quick! Give him a cabinet post!

>>

Right! You figured it out my little cuckpublican bottom!

Look at the stats of how many "jobs created" were created in the first few months (aftereffects of Obama) of Trumps presidency, and the numbers have been trending down ever since. Obama was still losing jobs in the first months of his presidency (aftereffects of Bush) but his numbers were trending up.

Eisenhower was a republican that led the troops during WWII which is exactly what you’d expect from a republican, Later on he talked about being diplomatic with the Russians and warning everyone about the military industrial complex, something a liberal would say.

So party doesn’t mean fuck all, it’s the person.

Here we can compare. Red lines mark Obama's presidency, black bars mark the months we're comparing.

As you can see, Obama's median is significantly brought down by the recession at the start of the presidency. Obama's high months are generally higher and more frequent, and all after a bit in to his presidency.

The points in time you're comparing are literally the end of the recession to now.

Attached: you're stupid as hell.png (1721x857, 162K)

progressive =/= liberal
Progressives are authoritarian leftists, liberals are closer to what libertarians are nowadays.
Democrats havent been liberals since the beginning of the 20th century.

And Trump's administration has been enjoying the fallout of the Obama fiscal and economical policies.

both sides are major faggots
nobody should support a single party

>zero corporational monopolies
I, too, have cognitive disfunction, user.

>>>Progressives are authoritarian leftists, liberals are closer to what libertarians are nowadays.

haha. "Classical Liberal" is closer to libertarian and still racist, sure. But you know that's not what is being referenced here. Teddy Roosevelt was a leftist in his time. He is colloquially a liberal.

Liberal principles overlap most democrats so that why people shoehorn them together.

Teddy Roosevelt was a Progressive Republican and a Bull Mooser (Progressive).
Progressivism has been in both major parties since the beginning of the 20 century.
Its also part of why i refuse to vote for either of them.

and how was he authoritarian again?

Does it meet Altemeyer's prerequisites of authoritarianism?

Come to Canada we have a party called the progressive conservatives, no fun when they’re in power.

Roosevelt was a progressive imperialist, not authoritarian. Does nobody rememver Teddy these days? Jesus, good thing I'm way beyond high school.

he was the biggest government republican on record, he created more offices and bureaus in the executive branch than any other republican, he was all about centralizing power. was also the prototype progressive for the later democrat FDR, also was the major intermediate progressive between Woodrow Wilson and FDR.

He's a shibboleth used by modern Republicans who deny the Southern Strategy while worshipping their liberal founders.

that's not what authoritarianism is dude. hahahaha

(Hey, what's one or two big fleets o' white battleships between friends, really?)

Will it be 7 years into trump and you’ll still say “you can thank obama for that”

orly? then do explain please.
Centralizing power leads to more authority at the government level.. the epitome of authoritarianism.

Well, yeah. Getting us out of a recession won't ever change there bro.

It’s fun to learn cause knowledge is power!

history.com/topics/us-presidents/theodore-roosevelt

I was referring to the fags that still say the enconomy and job creation 18 months later is still owed to obama

>At the expense of personal freedom when obediece to authority is enforced then it is called as Authoritarian Government
>Oxford Dictionary

No, that's not what authoritarianism is or means.

The world's leading expert on authoritarianism wrote a book he gives away for free.

theauthoritarians.org/about/

Dr. Robert Altemeyer is the number one dude who understands it.

free downloads here: theauthoritarians.org/options-for-getting-the-book/

Fiscal years are how these things are tracked, so really it's been about... six months.

Attached: Liberals.jpg (1200x909, 327K)

That’s why the release monthly job growth reports. Ok...

lol... and do explain how centralizing power doesnt impede on the personal freedom of citizens.. you create all these unelected bureaucrats writing laws that bind the hands of the average person, with no recourse against it.

see

Dude you are like a full-power 33rd level wizard retard. The US lost 3.6 million jobs in the first months of the Obama presidency because Bush had decimated our economy.

You really can't compare the two because Trump came in on a strong upswing in job GROWTH. He inherited an easy start, because the country had been put back together and was running well after being completely fucking destroyed by the Bush years.

So yes, he does owe his current success to Obama, just like he owes his business success to not paying his bills, cheating his suppliers, and inheriting millions from his daddy.

They are highly fearful of a dangerous world. Their parents taught them, more than parents usually do, that the world is dangerous. They may also be genetically predisposed to experience stronger fear than people skilled at “keeping their heads while others are losing theirs.”

They are highly self-righteous. They believe they are the “good people” and this unlocks a lot of hostile impulses against those they consider bad.

They are aggressive. Given the chance to attack someone with the approval of an authority, they will lower the boom.

They are highly prejudiced against racial and ethnic minorities, non-heterosexuals, and women in general.

They will support their authorities, and even help them, persecute almost any identifiable group in the country.

Their beliefs are a mass of contradictions. They have highly compartmentalized minds, in which opposite beliefs live independent lives in separate boxes. As a result, their thinking is full of double-standards.

They reason poorly. If they like the conclusion of an argument, they don’t pay much attention to whether the evidence is valid or the argument is consistent. They especially have trouble realizing a conclusion is invalid.

They are highly dogmatic. Because they have mainly gotten their beliefs from the authorities in their lives, rather than think things out for themselves, they have no real defense when facts or events indicate they are wrong. So they just dig in their heels and refuse to change.

They are very dependent on social reinforcement of their beliefs. They think they are right because almost everyone they know and listen to tells them they are. That happens because they screen out sources that will suggest that they are wrong.

Because they severely limit their exposure to different people and ideas, they vastly overestimate the extent to which other people agree with them. And thinking they are “the moral majority” supports their attacks on the “evil minorities” they see in the country.

They believe strongly in group cohesiveness, and being loyal. They are highly energized when surrounded by a crowd of fellow-believers because it makes them feel powerful and supports their belief that “all the good people” agree with them.

They are easily duped by manipulators who pretend to espouse their causes when all the con-artists really want is personal gain.

They are largely blind to themselves. They have little self-understanding and insight into why they think and do what they do. They are heavily into denial.

>unelected bureaucrats writing laws that bind the hands of the average person, with no recourse against it.
>unelected bureaucrats writing laws
>unelected
You have no idea how the legislative branch works, do you?

Attached: 1522302622829.jpg (488x410, 44K)

centralized power ensures that we the people are in control and decentralized power lets individuals and organizations gain more pore. Why do you think corporations are always weakening the government? Its so they can get away with making more profits and control the media.

Can you honestly believe that the party for poor people are the bad guys while the party for the powerful are innocent and under attack?