/gg/ - Guitar and Bass General

J Mascis Squier Edition

How do I start learning guitar?
>justinguitar.com
Suggested Practice Routine:
>i.imgur.com/yfgsTaq.png
Guitar chords and inversions
>chordbook.com/guitar-chords/
String tension calculator (D'Addario-based):
>stringtensionpro.com/
Music theory:
>musictheory.net/lessons
Hal Leonard's Bass Method:
>mediafire.com/file/sayviwqxfcxfjon/
Steve Vai's Ten Hour Workout
>mediafire.com/download/kzw6kjuocgicwks/Ten_Hour.pdf
Guthrie Govan's Creative Guitar 1 & 2
>mediafire.com/download/bn8803xzlrbds3b/Guitar1.rar
>mediafire.com/download/9uhtufuf3z9cx8m/Guitar2.rar
Advancing Guitarist - Mick Goodrick
>mediafire.com/download/cvfno10fv4lf4a8
Chord Chemistry - Ted Greene
>mediafire.com/download/61n5op7eiifxztg
Mickey Baker's Jazz Guitar
>mediafire.com/download/zq35xorj2iaqh22
Modern Chord Progressions: Jazz and Classical Voicings for Guitar - Ted Greene
>mediafire.com/download/oflu4wdwofhqqtb
Jazz Guitar: Single Note Soloing Vol. 1 & 2- Ted Greene
>mediafire.com/download/07o65qdh5in1nsq
>mediafire.com/download/jmu86f7dj8bdxcd

Previous thread:

Other urls found in this thread:

youtu.be/Vw4xn5SLz_U
youtube.com/watch?v=YK9Id0YP5Fc.
youtu.be/fyqlN6oCDDg
twitter.com/SFWRedditVideos

>Squier
Vomit

Brazil zil zil

>hey guys, I'm gonna review this $300 guitar
>now don't mind me while I run it through several pedals and a $2000 amp

This. I hate how every guitar or gear review now is processed af through the computer.

Oh I think that poor fellow has made a huge error with the design of that guitar. You see the truss rod access point being at the nut is a terrible design flaw. Picture related, a high quality guitar should always have the truss rod access point at the heel. Rookie mistake.

I watched some random video that popped up in my recommendations the other day
>here's literally the cheapest piece of shit I could find on Amazon
>now let me run it through a Mesa Boogie and a fucking EQ

>t. I have to justify the money I spent.
Fuck off, Richfa/gg/™, with your fancy shmancy guitars. Not just one, mind you, but two! Squier is just as good as either without having to pay for a stupid label on the headstock. A couple of hardware upgrades and it's off to the races. Hope you're happy putting some other schlumps kids through school.

>processed through a computer
explain exactly how someone is supposed to get a gear review online without processing it through a computer

What he means is they put it through a totally produced mix. Hard to tell what something really sounds like unless you hear it raw.

Is this playing considered 'good enough'?

youtu.be/Vw4xn5SLz_U

i can't watch people who remind me of myself sing bc i cringe so hard at myself singing so i'm not watching this

Being this dumb on purpose
Get a job poorfagg
Thanks for clarifying

once again how are you supposed to hear it raw after its been processed through a computer

being faithfully digitized != being manipulated by a DAW

How about i do your mom raw and then process that on a computer? Would i still be doing her raw?

a recording by definition would be a digital process which would take place through a computer which would negate anything even remotely resembling a raw or faithful reproduction of an organic/natural sound because of the digitization process

see

>straining at gnats this small

wtf it is the most faithful reproduction of the microfone's output as it doenst add analog artifacts or saturation.

digital recording is processing and manipulation by definition

manipulation extends to making it sounds different than it does live in ways like compression, eq. quit being stupid, it irritates everyone and you get nothing from it

reproduction = copy = process to mimic an original signal

i saw that shit too.

someone turned me onto 60 cycle hum who does some spotlights on cheap gear every now and again. Of course they're still guilty of "run this cheap guitar through expensive equipment" but they often break down the faults of the equipment and whats worth looking at.

like this for the First Act 222: youtube.com/watch?v=YK9Id0YP5Fc.

Autism

I just wish people that obviously have the money would run cheap gear through an amp the person buying it would probably use with no EQ. It would be refreshing.

You mean Fluff?

What's the difference between the PHONES output and outputs 1 & 2 on the back?

Because I plugged in my speaker to the PHONES output and got more way bass out of it. Like, the bass was nonexistent from the regular outputs.

But on my studio monitors in my dorm I get good sound using the back outputs.

setting an input level is a manipulation of the original signal
digital recording is a process that produces an approximation of the original sound

Goddamnit stop. Just stop.

i said shit tier trolling

(You)

For reference this is the speaker I'm using. It doesn't have a TRS input so I used a 3.5 to banana splitter and a 3.5 to 1/4 adapter.

tl;dr this sounds better through phones output, why?

youtu.be/fyqlN6oCDDg Dug through my history.

I've tried the korg miku stomp for a week before and got some usage out of it after getting around the latency. That being said, is it worth 200$ still.

Fluff

What gets my goat is fuckers who use expensive guitars, mics, etc. on cheap amps then process that shit to sound great then you go and buy that amp because you're stupid and damn it fuck!

yeah if you mic an amp really good you can make any piece of crap sound great

If you're looking to record a nice Julien Baker type guitar sound through a Fender Deluxe III, what sort of settings do you want? What kind of mic and what sort of placement for the recording? What pedals?

i asked for someone to explain exactly how someone is supposed to get a gear review online without processing it through a computer and instead of an explanation i got arguments which claimed no processing was taking place, all of which i have now soundly put to rest. if you care to answer my original question with a proper answer i'm all ears

sm57

Stop. You're not clever. You're not funny, you're not smart. You're not impressing anyone.

i'm still waiting on that answer user

>Guitar has pearloid on it
Why is it so common, it's fucking hideous and ruins the aesthetic of every guitar it touches

You've been BTFOd just stop man

>pearloid
the discerning guitarist calls this mother-of-toilet-seat

I dunno, I think it looks nice on my Martin.

Daily reminder that stratocasters are ugly

I have once fantasized about the most versatile guitar you can imagine
just as a thought experiment
What would you come up with?
The abomination I would end up with would be something like this:
-8 string
-Fanned frets
-Big scale
-Jumbo frets
-Floyd rose bridge
-G#BEADGBE
-3 D-tunas on the bottom 3 strings for max drop tuning possibilities
-Fuckit, D-tunas on all strings for switching between tunings even easier (let's assume the fuckers even work as intented)
-Tremol-no for maximum bridge type choice
-HHH pickups
-5 way selector
-coil tap for whatever the fuck reason (Blues/jazz?????)
-let's throw in active/passive switch for good measure
-and a killswitch at that

For the sake of the thought experiment; let's assume all things work as intended (especially fucking d tunas goddammit)

>-8 string
Unironically stopped reading right there.

>truss rod adjustment at the heel
Very nice my friend. Take note everyone, this is what a high quality, well designed guitar looks like. All accomplishments start off as aspirations, if you ever intend to be a real guitarist then owning a guitar with the truss rod access at the heel is a must somewhere along that journey.

>thinks tortoise shell is pearloid

>martin
>quality
Puke, next you'll tell me the les paul is the pinaccle of electric guitar design.

ayo gotta be 4 semitones higher than a bass guitar or you ain't shit

>thought experiment
>thought
>/gg/
not likely

There's lots of pearloid on the guitar. A closer look.

That's acceptable, I'm talking about this garbage

Where's the truss rod adjustment access point on a Les Paul my friend? I think you just answered your own question.

This is the best /gg/ meme in ages

hot take: J Mascis Squier is as good if not better than most current Fenders

nice intonation you got there FAGGOT

Push/pull pots that can put the humbuckers in parallel > coil tapping
Single coily tone with no hum.

It doesn't matter at all. You'd be lucky to get a les paul where the truss rod actually does something, even if the adjustment placement is retarded it might as well not be there at all in most cases.

Both of my Pauls have truss rods that work just fine.

Delusional poorfags should be banned on site

See

they must not say "gibson(tm)" on the headstock

One of them does. It works just fine. I have used it to make adjustments.

He probably can't check cause threw the headstock out after it broke off.

finding a good amp is the source of a good tone only took 2 moths to a any new guy


but these online communities including Sup Forums always have fender/gibson shills perpetuating axe sales by being ultra snobs/elitists

My Gibson Les Paul's headstock has remained intact in the 15 years I've owned it because I am an adult who can take care of his shit like an adult. It goes in the case when I'm not playing it. None of that stand bullshit.

>buying a gibson

>thinks abalone is pearloid

Haha, I like pearloid on surf guitars but not black pearloid.

I wouldn't buy one now but I don't regret buying the one I did 15 years ago. It's a great instrument.

i'm sursprised you don't hang on the wall next to your state dentistry cert

>tfw only a Gibson™ is good enough

>2002 gibson
>great instrument
Indeed, almost as good as the early 80s when the plants were filled with people getting fucked up on the job. Nothing like like determining complex measurements after polishing off a pint of canadian whisky in your morning coffee.

>Learn member of a band plays a Gibson™ Les Paul™
>Delete all their music and never listen to them again

ok so this general is just shitposting from beginning to end right

>reach pearly gates of Heaven
>St. Peter asks "What did you do with your life?"
>respond, "I shitposted by telling other people how good their instruments were, without having ever played them, on a Cambodian pictograph website"

This is Sup Forums. Every thread is just shitposting from beginning to end.

yes hello

it seems like everyone who posts here has an ax to grind

An axe? Like a guitar? Hahaha oh user!

There certainly doesn't seem to be too many happy people on Sup Forums.

>Gibson haters
>people licking Fenders asshole
>no actual advice or feeback
>shitposting about guitars you don't even own
>everybody accuses you of being a certain troll, perpetuating the shitposting
It's worse than /vg/ in here.

who are you quoting?

>if you don't like gibson then you like fender
It's like the American political system, 2 choices that benefit no one.

more like an axe to shred

literally practice it

yeah, no one... perfectly right, go-user!

>Henry Juszkiewicz
>CEO of Gibson Brands, Inc

>evaluating an instrument based on its brand rather than based on examining its individual merits in person via visual inspection and playing it

>tfw brands sold on rondo music have better qulality control than gibshit
I've never came across an agile that needed fretwork from the factory, with gibsons it's been more than 70% that need it.

i can give you my handmade takeda gyuto and watch you lose a finger trying to slice an apple, i can take your sysco/gfs/etc machine stamped knife and make a perfect brunoise of the same apple.

the manufacture of the tool matters lass than the hands using it.

>Even thinking about buying anything from an American guitar company

I only buy glorious nippon wood, chopped 4 million times

I could hand you a gibson and watch you lose a finger sliding across the expised fret tangs. What's your point?

>lose a finger sliding across the expised fret tangs
are you a woman? you exagerate like one

Are you a twink? Because you must only play open chords

i never said any such thing bitch.