Why do western governments allow mudshits to set up in enclaves where they will never assimilate...

Why do western governments allow mudshits to set up in enclaves where they will never assimilate? Why does the government allow them to convert the area into a crime ridden shithole and hotspot for "radicals" like the countries they came from?

Because of weakness and moral bankrupcy.

Because diversity is our strength :)

Because people are fucking stupid

if they did this in burgerland niggers would steal their shoes

Because they're to busy fapping to Sup Forums

Literally because it gives them good boy points.

I used to think it was some sinister plot, but the truth is just that they're ignorant. These politicians have ludicrously childish and naive views of the world. They sincerely believe that all these refugees from extremist muslim countries will be patriarchy fighting feminists as soon as they step foot in their new country. They cannot, and will not, ever see reality how it really is.

Socialists desperately need votes.

Thanks you cultural Marxism. The idea behind mass immigration is that within one or two generations of assimilation, the immigrant descendants would adopt their host countries culture in the West. They would eat burgers, drink coke and watch Friends. For groups like Chinese, Indians and Christinan Africans this was true. However, in the case of expansionist puritanical cultures like most Middle Eastern Muslim nations it seems that not only do they not assimilate, they can become actively hostile to their host culture. Basically they lump Islam in with a few good races and turn a blind eye to their shenanigans in order to save face.

Tfw i just want to be surrounded with people who are like me.

Exactly, we don't import anything good from these people except kebab shops. I used to have a couple of Muslim friends as a kid, but after school it seems as though they go entirely their own way and regress to the Islamic mean. This is true of most of my friends who knew Muslims as well.

tbf, probably because I spent most of the time in the pub from 18 to 21 so maybe we're the real problem.

Displacement of ethnic Europeans. You see, politicians think that, for example, Germans have a "fascist gene" and must be purged completely.

Pt I.

I have a plan to destroy America
by Richard D. Lamm

I have a secret plan to destroy America. If you believe, as many do, that America is too smug, too white bread, too self-satisfied, too rich, let’s destroy America. It is not that hard to do. History shows that nations are more fragile than their citizens think. No nation in history has survived the ravages of time. Arnold Toynbee observed that all great civilizations rise and they all fall, and that “an autopsy of history would show that all great nations commit suicide.” Here is my plan:

It's just that governments in the west haven't controlled where people live directly for hundreds of years.

They are just given the same autonomy everyone else is.

PT II

1. We must first make America a bilingual-bicultural country. History shows, in my opinion, that no nation can survive the tension, conflict and antagonism of two competing languages and cultures. It is a blessing for an individual to be bilingual; it is a curse for a society to be bilingual. One scholar, Seymour Martin Lipset, put it this way: “The histories of bilingual and bicultural societies that do not assimilate are histories of turmoil, tension and tragedy. Canada, Belgium, Malaysia, Lebanon all face crises of national existence in which minorities press for autonomy, if not independence. Pakistan and Cyprus have divided. Nigeria suppressed an ethnic rebellion. France faces difficulties with its Basques, Bretons and Corsicans.”

2. I would then invent “multiculturalism” and encourage immigrants to maintain their own culture. I would make it an article of belief that all cultures are equal: that there are no cultural differences that are important. I would declare it an article of faith that the black and Hispanic dropout rate is only due to prejudice and discrimination by the majority. Every other explanation is out-of-bounds.

Pt III

3. We can make the United States a “Hispanic Quebec” without much effort. The key is to celebrate diversity rather than unity. As Benjamin Schwarz said in the Atlantic Monthly recently, “The apparent success of our own multiethnic and multicultural experiment might have been achieved, not by tolerance, but by hegemony. Without the dominance that once dictated ethnocentrically, and what it meant to be an American, we are left with only tolerance and pluralism to hold us together.” I would encourage all immigrants to keep their own language and culture. I would replace the melting pot metaphor with a salad bowl metaphor. It is important to insure that we have various cultural sub-groups living in America reinforcing their differences, rather than Americans emphasizing their similarities.

4. Having done all this, I would make our fastest-growing demographic group the least educated. I would add a second underclass, unassimilated, undereducated and antagonistic to our population. I would have this second underclass have a 50 percent dropout rate from school.

It's literally only during Ramadan you see Muslims gathering up... otherwise all during the year at max you'll find 3 - 5 Muslims inside.

And that's usually the older ones - the young Muslims are mostly secular - and their kids will just probably be atheist and don't even bother with Islam.

Pt IV

5. I would then get the big foundations and big business to give these efforts lots of money. I would invest in ethnic identity, and I would establish the cult of victimology. I would get all minorities to think their lack of success was all the fault of the majority. I would start a grievance industry blaming all minority failure on the majority population.

6. I would establish dual citizenship and promote divided loyalties. I would “celebrate diversity.” “Diversity” is a wonderfully seductive word. It stresses differences rather than commonalities. Diverse people worldwide are mostly engaged in hating each other–that is, when they are not killing each other. A “diverse,” peaceful or stable society is against most historical precedent. People undervalue the unity it takes to keep a nation together, and we can take advantage of this myopia.

Look at the ancient Greeks. Dorf’s “World History” tells us: “The Greeks believed that they belonged to the same race; they possessed a common language and literature; and they worshiped the same gods. All Greece took part in the Olympic Games in honor of Zeus, and all Greeks venerated the shrine of Apollo at Delphi. A common enemy, Persia, threatened their liberty. Yet, all of these bonds together were not strong enough to overcome two factors … (local patriotism and geographical conditions that nurtured political divisions …)” If we can put the emphasis on the “pluribus,” instead of the “unum,” we can balkanize America as surely as Kosovo.

Pt V

7. Then I would place all these subjects off-limits–make it taboo to talk about. I would find a word similar to “heretic” in the 16th century that stopped discussion and paralyzed thinking. Words like “racist”, “xenophobe” halt argument and conversation. Having made America a bilingual-bicultural country, having established multiculturalism, having the large foundations fund the doctrine of “victimology,” I would next make it impossible to enforce our immigration laws. I would develop a mantra –“because immigration has been good for America, it must always be good.” I would make every individual immigrant sympatric and ignore the cumulative impact.

8. Lastly, I would censor Victor Davis Hanson’s book “Mexifornia” –this book is dangerous; it exposes my plan to destroy America. So please, please–if you feel that America deserves to be destroyed–please, please–don’t buy this book! This guy is on to my plan.

Because doing anything differently means they're being oppressive and discriminatory, after all, they wouldn't care if it was all white people setting up a christian community which values honest hard work :^)

I say it as a joke, but it is true. Blacks are usually pretty pissed that gay white guys come in droves to what used to be black communities, then they improve everything so much that the blacks can no longer afford to live there and so the blacks leave and now it's a white gay heaven rather than a black ghetto and that's "bad".