...
Why pitchfork can't give hip hop albums terrible scores, even when they are terrible
Other urls found in this thread:
medium.com
twitter.com
...
Tbh it would be kind of racist to totally destroy a hip hop album. It's a predominantly black genre, meaning the people who make it are sort of expecting it to be shit on by white folks.
holy shit it's like they try to be as wrong as possible
>tfw lil peep has a better score than the mars volta
Sup Forums btfo
White guilt, and they have to pander to their audience.
Is that why Nav got a 4.8?
It's called [spoiler]white guilt[/spoiler].
SremmLife 2 was good, HNDRXX isn't hip hop
checked
what's wrong with lil peep's album?
...
id say 7.3 is a pretty accurate score actually
Deserve least... so much less
It's because their core audience is poptimists and progressive yaas kween types
Same with fantano, because they're trying to get short term popularity boosts
>still a 5 though
fantano is actually a risk taker and shat on kanye at the peak of his popularity
but Kanye is a easy target
Quints confirm
they don't give new releases anything lower than a 5
they love niggers too much
>tfw
>doesn't post a face
Fuck off, you buzzwording newfag
checked
It's just as racist to effectively go 'awww look what the widdle baby did! Did you do this? Good boy!' by fluffing the review score
Didn't they give Saturation a 5 or 6?
Isn't Lil Peep white?
>has a better score than every Mars Volta album
>last show he ever does was in El Paso
fuck dude, i still can't believe that frances the mute review really happened. p4k is just trash really, their reviews are so ridiculously pretentious and badly-written at the same time. i'll take some juicy melon videos over them anytime
medium.com
Chris is the best writer they ever had.
shitty bait
Yes, russian
Why do you still take them seriously?