/sag/ - South Asia General: Sons Of Mars Edition

...

Other urls found in this thread:

politico.com/story/2017/06/13/jim-mattis-not-winning-afghanistan-239488
hindustantimes.com/world-news/can-t-adopt-white-child-try-in-india-british-sikh-couple-told-by-uk-agency/story-d1q2x79j3psuvwntkupFrO.html
twitter.com/NSFWRedditVideo

BIG AFGHAN COCK

Rajput ki ma ki chut.

The poonited states of americrap should also be added to that picture 2bh

>politico.com/story/2017/06/13/jim-mattis-not-winning-afghanistan-239488

Even secretary of defence mattis says that they are getting bacha baz'd

How can britbongs even compete?

lel 20+ years in Afghanistan still not winning
really activates m.......

Kek u curry niggers are so subservient. There's only one afghan in the general and u accept his BIG AFGHAN COCK.

Honestly has America won any war since WW2?

Utter shitshows in Korea, Vietnam, Iraq and Afghanistan.

Muh pe bol ke dikha, pandit kutte. Jabb teri aurton ko turkon ki raand banane se bachaya tha, tabb galiyan kahan thi tikke waalon ki?

Agar baniya goo khaniya hai toh jawab dena hi bekaar tha.

Atithi Devo Bhava

There are two options

1. Accept the BAC and enjoy the experience

2. Don't accept the BAC and cry throughout

Those picking option 2 are just setting themselves up for a world of pain, for no rational reason. Just accept it.

The first gulf war, kosovo war, bosnian war

better than the brahmin and baniya dogs

>Kek u curry niggers are so subservient
>Says jimmy chong

>Muh pe bol ke dikha
Kek. Are you in school kid?

>Jabb teri aurton ko turkon ki raand banane se bachaya tha
Don't confuse yourself with Guru Teg Bahadur. Rajputs were the original cucks.
>marrying off your sisters and daughters to the Muslims
>talks about saving others

>Agar baniya goo khaniya hai toh jawab dena hi bekaar tha
Wtf is that even supposed to mean. Please stick to English.

>Getting D&C this easily
>Also assuming he is a pandit
user I.....

Guide to beating the "strongest military force of all time" in two simple steps

>1. employ guerilla warfare
>2. See step 1

>Don't confuse yourself with Guru Teg Bahadur.
Why are poojinders such cucks?

>Atithi Devo Bhava
>'The guest is equivalent to god'
>WOULD WILLINGLY ACCEPT BIG AFGHAN COCK

A day in the life of pajeet
>Wake up
>SHIT ON STREET
>SUCK BIG AFG COCK
>Back to sleep

Legitimate reasoning, dutch fag should be extra gentle with you when delivering the BIG AFG COCK


PAJEET MOUTH IS RIPE FOR BIG AFGHAN COCK

Gulf War 1

>He confuses hyperbole with subservience
Fuck off back to your crack pipe nigger

There is no subservience ITT. We all homies.

>A day in the life of bogan
>Wake up
>get drunk
>beat wife
>eat your dog because chinks are your overlords now
>poo in roo
>get mangled on an escalator
>.01 chink yuan have been deposited in your family's account

mein meme spreads

I HATE fat ppl

Obligatory

Well it does a good job shutting off "muh khalsa" larpers

>tfw guy on right would be 10/10 in India

>"Egalitarianism is bad because nature"

- the finest Hindu intellectuals

>less than 60 mins and this thread is already off to a flying start
Save us Ram lala

>implying humans are not part of nature
Couldn't resist the bait this time desu

So by your reckoning, since humans are part of nature, egalitarianism (a human doctrine) is also "natural"

hindpoo intellectuals Btfo

>since humans are part of nature, egalitarianism (a human doctrine) is also "natural"
No, that's what you reckon and not me.

>hindpoo argumentation

>Afghan intellectuals can't into comprehension

Bro you are making no sense

Pajit and Afghan, Egalitarianism is shit, not because it's natural or unnatural, but because it's a wrong moronic belief system.

>Bro you are making no sense
(((sense))) is a jewish ploy to keep goyim from knowing that there is no inherent order/sense in the universe.

"If we use your own viewpoints we seem to find a contradiction with your earlier statements"

>no u

Hindu argumentation everybody

Why do Indians HATE equality so much? Is it the castes?

lel What equality? there is no such thing.

"If we reply to our own post we can btfo everyone"

Afghan argumentation everybody

I meant that people are treated equally before the law. You know, egalitarianism.

>people are treated equally before the law

where does this amazing thing happen?

It happens more in the West than elsewhere.

Nowhere is perfect, but that is not an argument.

Rich, powerful, influential, connected people can always afford better lawyers. There is no such thing as egalitarianism.

As I said, no country is perfectly egalitarian. But that is not an argument.

You can trivially see that a country like Denmark is more egalitarian than China.

>It happens more in the West than elsewhere.
You mean how after the 2008 market crash, the rich got themselves paid even more from the bailout money?
Yeah I know it's not an argument.

Bailout money was given so that all banks would not collapse simultaneously, creating a crisis much worse than we experienced and losing many trillions more.

What you mean is more rich and not more egalitarian.

No I don't. I mean more egalitarian. The USA has a higher GDP per capita but Denmark is more egalitarian.

>Bailout money was given so that all banks would not collapse simultaneously,
Yeah I know that, but what became of it? How many of them saw jail time?

got to go afghaaaaaaaaaan

>most famous dutch sitcom of all time (running for like 30 years) has a new character
>it's a refugee from afghanistan
>fucking dutch bitches

BIG

What should the bankers get jail time for?

>What should the bankers get jail time for?
Then who should we hold responsible for that mess?

Why do you want to jail bankers because of a financial crash?

They're an inherent part of the system, maybe even of human nature. Look at the Dutch tulip bubble. Would you have jailed people for that?

>Why do you want to jail bankers because of a financial crash?
>maybe even of human nature
>hold no one responsible
>but people are treated equally before the law in west than anywhere else
JUST
U
S
T

>hold no one responsible
>but people are treated equally before the law in west than anywhere else

What the fuck does the first even have to do with the second?

You can't even answer my question: WHY should the bankers be jailed. Name the law they broke.

>he literally can't

BAC'd

>Name the law they broke.
>targeting borrowers with less than perfect credit scores and less than adequate savings
>manipulating credit ratings to sell them off as good investments
You and I know where you're going with this.

Now answer my question:
Who should be held responsible for that mess?
Also
>They're an inherent part of the system, maybe even of human nature
Human nature is to kill rape and steal, should we discount those from law?

>targeting borrowers with less than perfect credit scores and less than adequate savings
>manipulating credit ratings to sell them off as good investments

So they didn't break a law? Exactly.

>Who should be held responsible for that mess?

Regulating bodies should have had more stringent requirements regarding leverage ratios and whatnot. This is addressed in Basel III. Done.

>Human nature is to kill rape and steal, should we discount those from law

Many bubbles and subsequent crashes are the result of irrational investor behaviour. How do you want to punish that? Moreover, why?

Every investor knows the risks of stock markets.

It seems so fucking simple to be honest. Learn from the countries that are doing things better than you. Take a look at Scandinavian countries that are the most egalitarian in character. People who speak against it are those who spend more time on bullshit rather than learning the basics of philosophy and economics.

To the Pajeet speaking against egalitarianism, take a look at John Rawls, his books will answer all your concerns about an equal society.

You are making logical arguments, but you haven't read about the 2008 crisis in detail. It happened because of perpetration of -fraud- on a massive scale. To explain in extremely simple terms: they had people buy overpriced thing by lying about their worth

All bubbles (Real estate, Dot com) were artificially and intentionally created.

tl;dr this is what a debate between people who are ignorant of the topic reads like. If you guys can expend effort on spouting bullshit you can also open a book and read.

Kill yourself poojeet. You know absolutely nothing about finance

>All bubbles (Real estate, Dot com) were artificially and intentionally created

Never reply to me with this fucking conspiritard bullshit again

>the outrage of the ignorant
I was about to post reportage from a reputed magazine, but won't bother now. Continue your stupid debate.

>So they didn't break a law? Exactly.
As I said we both know where we are going with this, but are you genuinely gonna overlook the greed that propelled bankers to do this? What about paying bonuses to themselves after the fact while the common people lost their savings and pensions?
Yes those things are not against the law but neither is pouring oil in all the water wells I can find, doesn't mean I should be doing it.

>Regulating bodies should have had more stringent requirements regarding leverage ratios and whatnot
But weren't most of them dissolved or intentionally kept understaffed? I'm not so sure about this so I might be wrong

Many bubbles and subsequent crashes are the result of irrational investor behaviour. How do you want to punish that? Moreover, why?
(((Greed))), so you don't punish that and the next time when it happens again you again bail them out? Do you really think that the "free market" will regulate itself?

>Every investor knows the risks of stock markets.
Yes but not every common person does, which is why they were the ones hit hardest from the crash. If your investor keeps telling you to buy this stock because it'll triple your money and you do only to loose all your money, that sounds like a fair game to you?

You still haven't answered this:
>They're an inherent part of the system, maybe even of human nature
Human nature is to kill rape and steal, should we discount those from law?

Feels like I'm debating a brick wall
>You still haven't answered this

I did.

>Many bubbles and subsequent crashes are the result of irrational investor behaviour. How do you want to punish that? Moreover, why?

This was my answer.

Are you geniuenly this retarded?
What you did was cleverly disguise the greed the bankers had under the "irrational investor behaviour" which according to you shouldn't be punished since there is no law against it.

What I asked was since can I chalk up rape and murder to the same "irrational human behavior" since it maybe is part of the human nature, should it be punishable as well?

>I was about to post reportage from a reputed magazine
post it here, I'll learn something maybe

NEED to bum gaypaki

>name an edition after a non-desi God
WRONG.

free khalistan WHEN?

kek
rationalists BTFO

not the bankers you fucking retard, the investors

it's investors who cause bubbles, not bankers

jesus christ it's like talking to babies who have zero knowledge on finance

>muh banker boogeyman

fuck off socialists

>caste shit
you realize the moment you step outside of india, that the rest of the world sees you guys as poojeets all on the same level?

What fuck you two are still at it?

hol up hol up
so bankers arent responsible for the 2008 bubble??

>implying poojets and poojinders have any level of self awareness

Make Bhejakhalistan in Kanada, pajinder.

you realize sikhs are pretty much the only indians respected by other people, the rest of indians are looked at as subhuman

the banks had very high leverage ratios because the CDOs they sold to retards. high leverage ratios mean that banks get fucked extra quickly when they lose money.

This is NOT illegal. Now with the Basel III accords they will put some kind of cap on how these ratios can become, I think.

>we are sikhs bro
>we are bro tier
>we are so different from other indians bro

hindustantimes.com/world-news/can-t-adopt-white-child-try-in-india-british-sikh-couple-told-by-uk-agency/story-d1q2x79j3psuvwntkupFrO.html

how HIGH

>takes more than 90 minutes for his reply
>no valid answer to any question in the last post
>b-but muh bait and switch will work
>maybe throw in socialist as an added insult, boy that'll show him.
Thanks for showing everyone here what a pathetic fucktard you are, I really wonder how you got your "bsc in physics"?

>ignoring the fact that sikhs have contributed to india's defence more than 1bn malnourished veggie munching hindoos

shitty bait pics wont change anything, friendo :^)

Honestly in all my years on Sup Forums I have never had a discussion with someone who is as retarded as you.

I know when someone is baiting or just pretending to be a retard. You are not pretending. You are legitimately stupid.

I'm just wondering, is it just that your English is not that good so you don't really understand what you're reading, or are you actually just that fucking stupid.

I hope it's the former but I suspect it's the latter. All the poisonous fumes from the designated shitting streets must have killed off your braincells.

I can't believe I seriously had a discussion with some barbaric savage halfway across the world about the merits of an egalitarian society.

I guess it's true that barbarians cannot be civilised through words. I should let the barbarians fester in their retarded religions and castes and whatnot.

> All the poisonous fumes from the designated shitting streets must have killed off your braincells.
Says the literal inbred retard who's ass got bacha bazi'd by his maulvi.
You're right, you can take a retard out of his country but you can't take the retard out of him.

Pretty shameful that if this guy had stayed in his country, the flag would've made it for his stupidity.
But I guess it's a brave new world out there, where actual subhuman spawns of rapists can hold bachelor degrees from prosperous countries.

>indians itt are against everyone having equal rights and starting from a blank slate on birth because of the caste system
lmao

glad my parents left that shithole, sad that I have to go back every few summers
>mfw my face upon landing in india and the poo fumes entering my nostrils

Thankfully his savagery will problem never leave the pissant village he comes from.

and yet you still suck indian dick, kill yourself

The Indians who have freed themselves from the shackles of Hindpooism are great people. Same for the Pakistanis who have freed themselves from the shackles of Pisslam.

>The Indians who have freed themselves from the shackles of Hindpooism are great people
they're the ones insulting you itt

non sikh and non kashmiri indians are trash, gujaratis are fine too

The argument started because the Hindpoo didn't agree that egalitarianism was good. I assume this retarded opinion of his was a result of his Hindpoo castist upbringing.

One day, I'm sure he'll embrace his true subhumanness, all that rape and pillage blood that runs in his family and end up as the headlines on 9'O clock news.
I'll have a good chuckle then

those are all pakis, aka basically indians

nah kill yourself, indians are subhuman and so are you for not acknowledging that

Nice try, but fuck off

>One day, I'm sure he'll embrace his true subhumanness

He himself embraced it a long time ago it seems.

those guys are all mirpuri and punjabi pakis