Dis tru pol?

Dis tru pol?

Literally Islamification

Well yeah of course.

We are the ones with the warrior genes. The ones who are not passive feminine fags.

And when we take power in November there will be such a reckoning....

>he thought day of the rope was satire

/thread.

>Liberal: Oh you support Trump? Then it doesn't matter what I do to your house, car and kids!
There, fixed it for you.

I can remember talking to liberals 10+ years ago, about power shifting to them and what they'd do with it. They went on and on about how fair they'd be, how they wouldn't do to others what was supposedly done to them etc.

Here we are in 2016, and they're largely doing exactly what they said they wouldn't do.

...

>We are the ones with the warrior genes.

Fucking kek, doesn't seem like it. ATM the right are the complete cucks of the left. And you neck-beards just stay in your homes shitposting on Sup Forums talking about how masculine you are and how you have "warrior genes".

Pic related is your average Sup Forums user.

Most Liberals are useful idiots who are barely active in politics. Maybe the people you spoke to fall into that group and remain un-involved today.

Most people I know in commie-fornia are SJWs, but they won't bring it up unless you say something "problematic" at which point they will light up and spout some rehearsed bullshit. Otherwise they are harmless, but they influence politics through their passive-aggressive intimidation.

It's a Godwins law slippery slope straw man.

Moderate right wings are less dangerous than fascist left wings, the real message should be that advocating censorship, silencing debate, controlling information, having dual ideologies (one for in group members and another for your detractors) is something either extreme side of the bipartisan spectrum is capable of... Except libertarianism or classical liberalism. It should be what fascism actually means, pragmatic intellctut dishonesty.

I'll show you fascism, you little faggot. C'mere

Liberals advocate free speech?

FALSE!
Liberal: Everyone who isn't a Liberal is a fascist and everything they say is hate speech and should be illegal.
Everyone else: That's crazy!
Liberal: SHUT UP< FASCIST!

In principle, agreed.

FPBP

I'm going to kill cucks because they put my children in danger

wow, this is such a retarded post. weeeeeeeeew I cannot believe someone can be this stupid.

Why do they always talk about how "hate speech" isn't free speech then?

Yep

freedom isnt free

>free speech should be limited to those I deem worthy

If everyone has free speech then you should be able to debate and use the same power of free speech to defeat the hate speech. Basically this tweet is saying he wants a one sided arguement.

You're fucking parrots...You add nothing, its just regurgitated bullshit..


Do you actually think you have anything to add to the discussion..ANYTHING we haven't heard a million times in school, movies, kike tv etc..

What could you possibly say that hasn't been said a million time

very true, I don't understand why western left does not see that islam is a fascistic ideology

everyone a liberal disagrees with is a fascist and deserves violence

>liberals
>free speech

LIberal: Anyone who disagrees with my views should be jailed, perhaps violently assaulted or even murdered.

Fascist: I don't exist

Trump Supporter: Please stop calling me a fascist and using it as an excuse to attack me and oppressing my 1st amendment freedoms

You can jiggle this around for Europe and Farage, Wilders etc etc.

>implying liberals have ever been in favor of freedom of speech

Don't know what liberals you've been talking to, but Anti-Fa have been saying since the 80's (at least) that they spend all day, erry day dreaming of the Great Gulags and Purges.

>fascist will necessarily gain power once they're allowed to talk

Leftists seem to have a great degree of confidence in fascism.

Liberals just got done fighting Trump supporters in San Jose.

islam is not fascism

Also;

>Liberal

You mean Leftist or Marxist.

You're not a liberal.

I wish they'd stop using that terminology and I wish the right would stop giving it to them.

>liberals
>willing to hear any opinions different from their own
That's where he's wrong

Eh, it pretty much is. Fits the bare bones definition.

His point makes sense, which is why every group needs their own country. Democracy doesn't solve disputes, borders and sovereignty do.

Not a legit quote senpai

>internationalist anti racist theocratic ideology fits fascism

this

If you gave a fuck you'd already know the answer.

>This is what liberals really believe

Yes. That man is a cuck.

Huh, this strawman kinda makes you think doesn't it? Hmm

The funny thing is that the actions of neo-""""liberals""" are literally fascist by definition.

Who would've fucking thought.

>liberals think their system protects free speech

Leftist: We must use the guns of the state to suppress any fascist opinions.

Fascist: We must use the guns of the state to suppress any contrary opinions.

it protects "free speech" as far as they define that

i.e. "what they dont mind hearing"

>the man has no dick

> Liberal: You can't have free speech to insult me
> Fascist: kys faggot

>(in general use) extreme right-wing, authoritarian, or intolerant views or practices.

I guess "technically" World Wide Caliphate counts as a "nation", hence...Nationalism?

Yes it is. Are you retarded?

>@thatsnotkosher

Sup Forums's right again!

No one remembers Lebanon

Humanity shows it's true face when hidden under a mask

damn no takers, and you even posted a picture. better luck next time

what do u mean u fucken ass ahahahaha

>Liberal: fascists should have free speech and a platform

No, it's not true.

>No one remembers Lebanon
someone redpill me on lebanon

Deep inside, we're all big guys.

how

>Liberals advocate free speech?
so long as it agrees with their views, otherwise its "hate speech" which "should be a crime"

Took the b8

Yes it is. Freedom of speech is an inherently liberal concept and right.

You not knowing what words mean does not actually affect change upon said words. Maybe you should try learning about the world from sources of information with more complexity then easily digestible soundbytes by marketers, pundits and demagogues.

That would take effort though.

>Liberal: everything that I don't agree with is "hate speech" and should be banned

FTFY

For you.

It's bullshit. Reality is more like this:
>Liberal: Fascists shouldn't be allowed free speech and must be sent to re-education camps
>Fascist: When I get into power I will kill you and all your kind for destroying freedom all these years.

You can have all the free speech you want as long as you agree with them.

what does that fucken mean that sounds so gay holy shit

pol is a board of faggots fuck

We're are like 2% of the population and scattered all over the world we must find something to get the power because raw power won't do it in this year and time

Was it your plan to get caught in this discussion?

> islam
> internationalist
> anti racist

what the fuck are you talking about?

Classical liberalism and liberalism are not even close to the same thing.

Classical liberalism looks more like libertarianism

He is not a liberal he is a progressive its different

That's the complete opposite of what we saw in San Jose.

>Liberal: X should have free speech

Holy shit, that is fucking rich.

no. this has been a very weird experience for me, of which I will lament for years to come. I will look back on this thread with mystery and awe, at what transpired here

Don't be silly. We won't kill you, we'll castrate you. You will be fine. Trust me.

Liberal: socialists should have free speech and a platform
Socialist: Thank you, as soon as i get into power im going to starve you all and send those that disagree with me to the gulags. 100 million more deaths on "but its not actually true communism."

It doesn't matter how inherently or historically liberal the concept is if modern liberals in general don't think it should apply to fascists.

Unless you're arguing that liberals generally believe that fascists should have a right to 'free speech and a platform', in which case I'd have to disagree. At best liberals would be split on that issue.

Upon further image manipulation, I have produced this.

More accurate.

>Liberal: fascists shouldn't have free speech and a platform, also everyone that doesn't agree with us is a fascist

First post is best post.

Well congratulations, you got yourself caught.

>a little muslim immigration
>a little more
>a little more
>did anyone else notice half the population is muslim all of a sudden?
>civil war
>no more christians

>@thatsnotkosher
Oy vey!

>"leftist": we should support violently Mexican fascism because they'll kill white men who say "fuck"
>Mexithugs: *indiscriminately murder white people and Jews*

>Jew: jews

caught with what

ur freaking me out faggot

Replace Mexican with Muslim and you've got Europe.

Literally the exact opposite of that

You could say the exact same thing about conservatives.

...

Jesus christ, this is what happens when you don't let your kids grow up on Sup Forums

Fucking cuck should be burned and then put in the gas chamber and then burned again twice

If I pull that mask off, will you die?

"warrior gene" is a name cucks gave to a gene that literally cases a person to be incompatible with others
its very very uncommon for people to have this gene, even blacks if you believe
but more blacks tend to have it than whites
cucks named it the warrior gene so it sounds more desirable

no, i'm invincible

australia get out

LIberals literally applauded shutting down Trump's Chicago rally because they were "shutting down facism"

...

The fire rises.

>Sup Forums is an imageboard of piece

More accurate
Although fascists, by definition, were lefties

Exactly what happens everywhere. More and more muslims, religion of peace, even more muslims, few legislators here an there, some politicians, some laws here and there, sudenly to much muslims, dhimmy, jizya, bullying and then ethnic cleansing when slimes grow bored of you.

I really think there is some block in people's heads. This shit happened in several countries just in the last half a century, and literally few years back someone drew a picture of their pigfucking prophet and millions of muslims all across the world (including Japan for fuck sake) went out to burn and destroy. I never see anyone mention it when they go 'muh tolerance, religion of peace'. Blind and deaf, even if the info is a click of a button away. You can even talk with people who were target of ethnic cleansing.

Why would you respond to a shitposter before kicking him out of a thread?

source please. because i cant seem to find one