Thoughts on st vincent?

thoughts on st vincent?

Other urls found in this thread:

youtube.com/watch?v=fVhCo7PoVpA
youtube.com/watch?v=CTg4WKcOJ3g
vocaroo.com/i/s1umRMhofTzp
vocaroo.com/i/s0HfR529GP0S
youtube.com/watch?v=zYPhXA2zHCU
twitter.com/SFWRedditGifs

Is that a holder for her latte?

I don't appreciate her music, and try as I may, I can't get into objectifying her sexually.

came here post these words

Why is she trying to sell her music with sex all of a sudden?

nice to see she's whoring up her image to sell more records good role model for young artists

then why the fuck are you even here?
t. underage idiot

mommy

It's sad that she's going die this year

quads confirm

Fuck guys, we can't just keep killing musicians

Never heard that one before

>that ass

I like her noise rock influence, but can't listen to more than 3 St. Vincent songs in a row.
She's a hot mommy though

>then why the fuck are you even here?

If we don't like something we insult the fanbase. It's the Sup Forums way.

cut that shit out user

her covers are better than her music

mostly because they’re not her music

Dumb SJW who makes average music

lmao owned

BRRAAAAAAPP

that guitar looks so fucking retarded.
legitimately can't take her serious as a musician because of it.

BASED
youtube.com/watch?v=fVhCo7PoVpA

Why do brainlets have a hard time understanding obvious concepts? That's my question.

It just looks like an Explorer with the ends chopped off. Why the hate?

An open question was fielded to all who read it begging for a reply. We replied with negativity. If op just wanted a circle jerk thread of "ain't Annie so hot and creative I wanna have her babies and suckle them with my soyboy tits", it should've been worded differently

fucking finally

youtube.com/watch?v=CTg4WKcOJ3g
Awful

Got damn

She'll be fine.

Jesus fucking Christ. I threw up in my mouth a little.

you're being baited

she aight

Why is she dressed like that? Is she a slut?

vocaroo.com/i/s1umRMhofTzp

>>Listen or I kill this guy

witnessed

That's something I can't understand, if you're going to dress like that, just post some nudes already. People gotta fap, for fuck's sake, and all you're accomplishing is making their lives harder. One thing you're certainly not doing is managing to avoid being a slut, just being incompetent st that. And if you try to be a slut and fail, bitch you don't deserve to live

i assumed it was ironic in some way but I'm still not sure what point she's trying to make

annoying af

The joke is that she's portraying herself as a tease and is justly getting the reaction she seeks from people. Every time I see posts like this I'm gradually more convinced that this is her smartest and heaviest record.

That people are obsessed with sex and as a result there is a widespread commercialisation of it? It's pretty obvious in my opinion.

Dunno, it's rare but some cunts manage to not get some fatal venereal disease on the first year of becoming whores. Plenty of non-fatal ones you can get before.

>ironic
It's the slut version of 'XD i was just pretending to be retarded to troll u'

I thought that's what she was going for too, but I was hoping there was more too it than that. kinda disappointingly simple honestly

photoshopped that pathetic ass

that's stupid

This is like saying Chaplin dressing up as Hitler was him "pretending to be retarded". It's a good thing you don't even have to pretend, user.

I'm not. It worked. Look how angry people are at her "whoring out". And look how many people immediately jumped to the conclusion that she validly used sex to sell records. It's exactly the type of reaction that proves the point of the record.

keep going

Thank you for your service

vocaroo.com/i/s0HfR529GP0S

No, you're just despaired to defend her because you're a faggot. It's not the same, unless Chaplin, in order to perform as Hitler, had to kill jews. A normal woman is shy of showing her body in public because she doesn't want to be a slut. If you do the action, you don't have that instinct.

All of this is unsubstantiated bullshit and you're removing artistic intent from what is clearly a part of art as a medium of expression.

she's pretty

>part of art as a medium of expression.
Ok, don't forget to call me to fuck your wife in front of you, when you marry a pornstar.

What you're functionally saying is that Annie can't play a part without being a slut. It's like saying Chaplin was a fascist because he played one. It's the same level of stupid.

Also, it's telling that you consider scantily clad women to be "sluts", but that's a slightly separate matter.

because she relies on shocking people, except this time the shock will be us noticing she's getting older, losing her looks and trying to cling to them

im gay

OP: thoughts on st vincent?
user: i dont like her
anon2: OMG WHY ARE YOU HERE THEN GTFO, I CAN'T GET YOU PEOPLE

T. a person who hasn't followed her career

I know and I accept you ;)

No, I'm saying that Chaplin could play Hitler without doing any action that would change his status of not being Hitler (or like Hitler). Her performance requires that she enact something that in itself is only possible for a slut, so in that specific case the performance aspect does change her (assumed) previous status of not being a slut.

What would you say of Cosey Funny Tutti, from Throbbing Gristle, or Catherine Ringer? Both musicians who said they made pornography, like literal pornography, Catherine even ate logs of shit, as a form of artistic expression or performance? Would you say them too are sheltered from the moral judgment that would be passed upon any other porn whore?

Shell be fine
(apart from being an ugly saggy bum skinny slag)

Saggy and skinny? Each to his own I suppose.

Is Annie taking Taylor Swift pills???

So you're gonna say somebody like, say, Madonna, whores herself out to "send a message", and not because she knows it will sell and she's taking advantage of it?

Never reply to namefags

>proves the point of the record.
The point of the record being that sluts who dress like sluts are not sluts? lol

pretty ugly

But Chaplin didn't literally play Hitler. Just a fascist based off of him. By the application of your logic, he is unable to perform this role without exhibiting fascist tendencies and inspiring fascist sympathies. Of course, this isn't true. Neither is it true that Annie is inherently a slut for dressing in an overtly sexual manner, especially when there's a clear objective that has absolutely nothing to do with sexually titillating people.

It's very important to keep actions and the presentation of an artist in context with what they're trying to accomplish, but you don't seem interested in that at all.

Madonna was demonstrably a cynical and capitalist-minded person. But you're being kind of disingenuous if you think that if somebody does something similar to another person, then they must have the same motivations, conceptual drive, and beliefs. Please don't tell me you actually believe this.

Jesus, is this Lemmy all over again?

Doesn't she rely on shocking? Her entire career is "look guise! look how artsy I am! "
But no matter what she does, someone will always defend her because of
>artistic intent
This is the same reason why Basquiat is celebrated by pretentious "artsy" people
This is the same reason why there is "feminist art" in which the "artist" puts a used tampon in a cup.
> wow! so rebellious! sending a message!

so sexy

Elaborate on how her career has revolved around that in any way. The reverse of people ever defending anything she does is people hysterically making baseless accusations they don't corroborate.

They're on completely different levels, not even fair to bring Taytay up, she'd obliterate Annie any day. Tay don't play.

Is there a video of this performance? If not, dump more pics.

No, you retarded brain failing cripple.
There's no argument in the world that to play a part you need to have a tendency or be inspired by what you're portraying. You just invented that and are now throwing around like you do lube in your gay orgies.

Your side of the argument still sustains that two different things happened:
a)she dressed up in that way
b)she did that with an artistic intent
Those were the same thing in time, but are two different things. a) is obviously truth, as there's photo evidence of it. b) is just your opinion.

Now, I'm saying that regardless of b), a) in any circumstance makes someone a whore, because it's an act in and of itself, which consists in whoredom, in mine and of morality's point of view.
I get that you disagree with that, and think that b) somehow justifies it, but I disagree with that. In your Chaplin argument there's no a), or any act that can be judged negatively in isolation, so it can't be judged bad in that context. In the case of this bitch, there's an act that would be judged negatively, by some, in isolation, and is also in this context, if the person making the judgment doesn't agree with your point of view that b) is a fair reason to do that act.

she's gained mass

You do realize you're overcomplicating an extremely simple diagnosis for the sake of white knighting her? How do you know she's not a cynycal capitalist minded person? Because she's artsy? Because she has indie cred? It's not like she squeezed the stories with Kristen Stewart and Cara Delevigne to make bank, right?

I love TayTay :3

St. Vincent and Kristen Stewart were dating? How am I just finding about this now wtf?? It's a shame Kristen Stewart turned into a lez, such a waste :/

liking the new sorta trashy mommy taytay look. shame about her new music though

HNNNNNNGGGGGG

It sounds bad, but that might be because it is live for television.

when did tay get so scrumptious

>There's no argument in the world that to play a part you need to have a tendency or be inspired by what you're portraying. You just invented that and are now throwing around like you do lube in your gay orgies.
You're implicitly (fuck, almost explicitly) saying that when you call her a slut because she's incorporating sex into her new album's/tour's concept. You're the one making the argument by dismissing the artistic intent she's displayed, not me.

>Now, I'm saying that regardless of b), a) in any circumstance makes someone a whore, because it's an act in and of itself, which consists in whoredom, in mine and of morality's point of view.
Again, I'll make the comparison to Chaplin portraying a fascist: "Regardless of Chaplin's intent, he portrayed a fascist, and is therefore a fascist". You seriously have no argument. You're asserting things as fact without giving them a grounding. Explain the following: why is she a slut/whore for dressing the way she does, or incorporating sex into her act in any way? Why are you ignoring the way actresses can play whores but not be whores?

>I get that you disagree with that, and think that b) somehow justifies it, but I disagree with that. In your Chaplin argument there's no a), or any act that can be judged negatively in isolation, so it can't be judged bad in that context. In the case of this bitch, there's an act that would be judged negatively, by some, in isolation, and is also in this context, if the person making the judgment doesn't agree with your point of view that b) is a fair reason to do that act.
But this is how performance art works. I'm not understanding what's fundamentally negative about the things Annie has done in the same general conceptual playing field of playing a role for art. You're not really explaining that, man. This isn't JUST my opinion, and your argument rests on that instead of establishing the negativity in what you're arguing against.

She needs to have kids soon. I don't wanna see her whoring herself out in her 30s for attention. She's pure, she deserves better.

Another comparison: Julia Roberts is literally a whore because she played a whore. It's ridiculous to call Annie a slut/whore because of this album and the performance art aspect of her live shows.

Tay is so sexy

youtube.com/watch?v=zYPhXA2zHCU

She doesn't look happy in that pic. What have they done to her? What happened to that sweet girl?

The important thing here is that you're asserting something you're not attempting to prove. There's evidence that these things we're discussing are artistic in nature (the name of the album is Masseduction, for fuck's sake, and she's made parallels between women and mannequins as a representation for how women are commercialised and objectified), but not a lot to suggest that she's doing this just to sell records. Just argue against things I'm saying, or don't.

Tay needs real love

ay

But actresses are whores.
>oh but X actress
What number do you think is higher, actresses who whore themselves or those who don't? Do you really think Weinstein is the only villain and not just a guy who messed with the wrong people? Do you think whores are rare in Hollywood? Have you never heard of yachting and related practices?

The thing is what defines a fascist is not his clothes. He might have a trademark wardrobe, but that isn't a sign he's a fascist. A sign that he is a fascist would be some sort of authoritarian measure or action. A whore on the other hand is recognized by the way she dresses, because she's exposing herself, the very same thing which makes her a whore. If I wore a Hitler mustache that wouldn't make me Hitler as long as I didn't repeat his actions. If I wore high heels and panties in public though that would make me a whore. It's not that hard to grasp.

Who?

I'm gonna have a heart attack
HOW CAN BLACKS EVER COMPET?

fuck off, why do fucks like you have to make everything about race.

Whore themselves out in what way? Literally? Figuratively? Speculatively? I like how you're onto me for asserting things as fact based on B) (my opinion), when you're doing far worse: asserting things based off of dozens of people you don't know because of trends in Hollywood. I'm not naïve, but I also don't assert that women are whores because gossip websites tell me so. You're committing a more egregious crime of placing opinion above fact than I am right now.

As for Chaplin: he said and did fascist things while dressing up as one. If you define a whore by the way they dress, then you clearly don't know the definition of a whore. Same thing for "slut", which is so incredibly subjective and vague as to be a completely meaningless way to describe women. Like you literally just said
>A whore on the other hand is recognized by the way she dresses
This is untrue. It's not the definition of the word and it makes you look intellectually dishonest for saying so. Establish the negativity behind dressing scantily.

:/