Gun Ban Immenent, According to DNC

>The video of Schaefer decrying private gun ownership comes just three days after presumptive Democrat candidate Hillary Clinton refused to answer George Stephanopoulos’ question as to whether the right to bear arms is constitutional.

Stephanopoulos asked the question twice and both times Clinton avoided answering it. The closest she came to answering it was when she said, “If it is a constitutional right, then it–like every constitutional right–is subject to reasonable regulation.”

google.com/amp/www.breitbart.com/big-government/2016/06/08/dnc-platform-member-nobody-gun/amp/?client=safari#

Pic unrelated.

Other urls found in this thread:

en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Federal_Assault_Weapons_Ban
youtube.com/watch?v=tgH6nhusfEM
twitter.com/SFWRedditImages

>democrats are antigun

Thank you, I had no idea.

Nothing new here.

Hillary is a criminal who wants to take away you rights, and everyone that owns a gun knows this.

Nothing's going to change this season, because neither one will get anything done.

>because neither one will get anything done.

That's loser talk.

Wow, amazing. She represents the moneyed elite who have been astroturfing and propagandizing gun control forever because they know a revolution would put them neck first in to a rope.

So will Trump.

Stay vigilant.

Trust no one.

oh stuff it.

get this fear mongering bullshit back to Sup Forums. Nobody cares about your conservative paranoia.

You have convinced me, I am now a HillBilly

The Messiah of memes will only live up to how well we meme it. Meme harder and we will reap the rewards of a better tommorrow. Make America great again!

The same words were echoing through my head... the right is afraid of their own shadow.

>every constitutional right
>subject to reasonable regulation

>wants to regulate 2nd Amendment rights
>has voted for every war and sold arms to literal terrorists

Doesn't this rather belong on ?

It's time to stop posting, Hillary.

Just fycking vote whoever is Republican and get both the House of Representatives and Congress as well as the Supreme Court as conservative/ Constitutionalist Libertarian as possible and we won't have to get our firearm rights taken away

>If it is a constitutional right, then it–like every constitutional right–is subject to reasonable regulation

wat

Are you fuckers SERIOUS? Perhaps you've already forgotten about $hillary's little pet project of a failure. You might've heard of it.

en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Federal_Assault_Weapons_Ban

As much as in your autistic world you want to place everything on Sup Forums into neat little boards where subject matter can never bleed over into other boards, it doesn't work like that.

I wanted to know whether applies to news of total gunbans or not, you don't need to immediately get asshurt over it.

Can't wait to vote for the God Emperor.

>Democrats literally come out saying that they want X or Y type of guns banned
>Every Democrat run state has a shit ton of anti-gun proposals
>Hillary says on record that she doesn't agree with the 2nd amendment

>URR DURR YOU GUYS ARE PARANOID!!!

How the fuck can you even function with a brain that small?

Please tell me you're joking.

He's been for and against gun bans and we have no idea where he actually stands on anything.

He literally takes inspiration from Hitler.

Only one asshurt here is you brah. Sorry your autismo standards can't flex.

>he takes inspiration from hitler
I love him even more

(you)

Go ahead and vote for Crooked Hillary. I want to be on the right side of history when the time comes.

>Trusting a New Yorker
>Ever

>“If it is a constitutional right, then it–like every constitutional right–is subject to reasonable regulation.”
There are people who agree with this statement.
Let that sink in

They're ALL New Yorkers. May God have mercy on us.

Can't wait for shillary to "regulate" free speech and freedom of the press

I hope all of us "Flyover states" just decide to split off so that a bunch of Coastal urban assholes stop deciding what goes out here

I'm probably not voting for anybody, I couldn't have it on my conscience voting for either of them.

Trump is a bigoted idiot rallying his followers with vague promises of glory and pride, his suggestions are absurd and he has no skills needed to lead.

He's a litigious, self centered asshole running purely on ego who doesn't give a fuck about the damage he does to anyone, including his own followers, as long as they believe his bullshit long enough to give him power.

He doesn't want to be president, that has too many restrictions and legal accountability.

He wants to be Caesar.

I do, but what I consider reasonable it probably a far cry from what Hillary does. Needing to pass the background check at your FFL is a reasonable regulation. Literally all it does is see if you're a felon or not.

Legitimate threats of violence should not be protected under free speech.

Freedom of religion should not protect you if your religion involves sacrificing babies.

There are reasonable limits to all freedoms, the issue is what people consider "reasonable".

Hillary isn't a fucking New Yorker, fuck you. She's a carpet bagging whore from Arkansas.

we have pretty damn good reason to be fearful
>multiple gun control acts reducing rights over the decades
>a very openly anti gun society (we have pro gun groups as well, but its pretty clear who gets the attention)
>a presidential candidate whos been under investigation for over a year for criminal charges is one of the finalist and only survived this long because of her power
>shes been anti gun for years, of all political things she goes back and forth on guns is the one thing she hates

Im all for mocking the trnfoils but being a little scared seems fair

>Trump is a bigoted idiot rallying his followers with vague promises of glory and pride, his suggestions are absurd and he has no skills needed to lead.

It has been said that the best politician is the one who does nothing.

>I'm probably not voting for anybody

the opposite of life is not death, it's indifference

I'm not indifferent, I would vote for another option if it were present, but I refuse to chose between two terrible choices. I can chose to do nothing than chose one of two alternate evils.

Here's hoping, but he could do a lot of damage. His hating on Mexico threatens to damage a relationship with one of our largest trade partners, he's openly hateful of our strategic allies and the projects he has been clear on (mostly the stupid wall) are huge money sinks that only serve to make his followers feel good.

The thing that scares me most about him is how he says he wants to open up and rewrite the libel laws to make it heavily punishable to 'spread lies' about him, which we all know means he wants the power to jail anyone who criticizes him.

>TFW Bernie Sanders is the only consistently pro-fun candidate.

Too bad Shillary cheated.

That was actually her shithead philanderering husband that sucks the cocks of Jews in the banking industry, but your point is taken. The danger of a federal ban is low unless the Congress shifts control (which might actually happen because of Congress' obstinence on certain issues). I'd be more worried about how the SCOTUS will shift since so many will likely retire or die over the next 4-8 years.

He's not pro gun at all.

There aren't any true Pro-gunners. Even the Libertarians managed to fuck up somehow

Yeah everyone knows Hillary doesn't wan to take your guns. These Sup Forums white nazis are crazy.

doing nothing is the definition of indifference

even if you don't like both choices, vote for the lesser of two evils to help out those of us who actually give a shit

you can "refuse to choose between two terrible choices" if that's enough justification but in reality you're just a do-nothing bitch with no right to complain how bad the candidates are

Illegal spic lover detected.

youtube.com/watch?v=tgH6nhusfEM

Here he tells a Gun control advocate what a retard she is.
But then he goes on to says some very anti-2nd amendment things.

He is not pro gun in the same sense most of us are, not at all. He will support and AWB and a mag ban and he will also probably support anti-self defense laws.

Illinois, actually.
Please stop repeating this. Senator Sanders stated that he supports a new assault weapons ban and has repeatedly voted for more gun control.

Bernie is not a pro-gun candidate. He's just less anti than Hillary.

>There aren't any true Pro-gunners. Even the Libertarians managed to fuck up somehow
I would have thought that the guy who said that gun laws and bans don't work and that gun ownership is a constitutionally protected right that shall not be infringed would be pro-gun. I guess Gary J is a gungrabber like all the rest.

So by your reasoning, if someone offered you a choice between choosing to drink arsenic or eat a cyanide pill, it's wrong to chose to abstain completely?

I wouldnt worry about it

This thinking gave us Obama.
Kys.

That is a flawed comparison, as you will have one or the other.

You are just demanding that someone else choose for you.

>libertarians

That reminds me of how utterly disappointed I am in Johnson. He doesn't not seem to be a trustworthy ally for gun rights and his VP candidate is guaranteed anti-gun.

For fucks sake, one of the defining characteristics of libertarians is to support individual rights and responsibility and to support gun rights. What the fuck happened?

>his hating on Mexico threatens to damage a relationship with one of our largest trade partners

1. He doesn't "hate Mexico" he hates illegal fucking immigrants, and rightly so

2. The only benefit from trade with Mexico is cheap labor, jobs which should be given to domestic workers, look at the domestic car companies with production plants in Mexico instead of Detroit

I'm prepared at this point to vote for whoever is most likely to bring on the Happening.

I wonder if the Libertarians are trying to market themselves more as in the middle than the other two parties.

This election season is pretty fucked

To be fair Mexico is probably safer than Detroit.

yeah, better to abstain 'n complain right?

Trump will bring forth a cleansing of America. The best kind of happening.

see this user

The Libertarian party candidates suck worse than the main parties candidates.

Gary Johnson is hamfisted at best and that running mate of his is a raging antigunner.

Whatever the Libertarians had going for them they squandered it with those two.

I wish Rand Paul would've made it further or at least held on.

You're one of those people who actually thinks you can just bring back jobs and boost the local economy. The world is so globalized that you would crash your economy before you could get rid of outsourcing.

Don't get me wrong, I agree that more manual labor jobs are required in the US for US citizens, but destroying trade with countries is not the way to go about it.

>1. He doesn't "hate Mexico" he hates illegal fucking immigrants, and rightly so
And the problem isn't that the illegal immigrants can get in; the problem is that companies in this country have jobs for them in the first place or companies abuse H1-B work visas so they can avoid hiring Americans and bullshit like NAFTA that incentivizes companies to shift their production facilities across international borders while reaping the benefits of the broken US tax system.

Even if Trump gets elected there's no jobs to bring back. China outsources labor to poorer Asian countries and Africa. The factories aren't in the US anymore, and Trump's solution of greatly increasing tariffs will only exacerbate the problem of poor buying power for consumers in the US because "$1 stores" will suddenly become "$3 stores" while wages stagnate.

I'd argue that it's not that they need regulations on rights, and more that there's a clear point where it wouldn't be right anymore

ie.
Threatening/inciting violence or injury on someone would not be considered free speech since it's basically a claim to infringe on another's right to life

Freedom of religion is freedom to follow/believe/preach any damn thing you want, but is not a free pass to infringe on anyone's rights to life, liberty, and pursuit of happiness

And of course, just like owning guns is a right, but killing someone unlawfully is still murder

>He literally takes inspiration from Hitler.
That isn't an insult on Sup Forums. Here is your $0.50 though.

At least we didn't make this mess then.

But injuring some one is already a crime.

Do you really want to become the thought police?

Actually, paid $hillary bot™ detected.

No, I just meant to provide a quick example but my point is that rights aren't a get-out-of-jail-free card for breaking the law

Daily reminder that, since the Presidential election is a first past the post system, a vote for anyone other than Trump is an effective vote for Hillary, and will directly lead to an overturning of the DC v. Heller trial (a 5-4 Decision) once she fills scalia's spot with a liberal judge

>inb4 what makes you think trump will pick a conservative judge?

I'd take a dice roll over a double-headed coin anyday

Exactly. Leftists want to absolve personal responsibility with laws and regulations and by turning the state into a caretaker, because they believe that the state is a bastion of moral superiority and that people are too stupid to care for themselves.

No it didn't. That thinking would've given us either McCain or Romney. The Anointed One™ was ushered in to office by millions of rapturous first time voting fans.

...

They are progressive false flaggers specifically intended to split the right wing vote and allow the corporatist elite to install their bildeberg approved Manchurian candidate.

These are the people constantly accusing everyone of being Sup Forums, gungrabbers in our midst

>implying bans on guns and ammunition no one should have in the first place aren't reasonable, "common sense" solutions to the EPIDEMIC of gun violence in this country
saged, reported, contacted the UN Security Council

Are you fucking retarded or did you not read my post at all?

Things like this just make me wish more and more that the fed would stop doing all they can to condense power at their level, and leave most of it up to state/local government.
Or we could Balkanize, that probably has potential to not be awful.

Your sarc detector appears to be defective.

>You are just demanding that someone else choose for you.
They already do. Your vote for POTUS is so meaningless in the first place that everyone should vote with their convictions first, and out of fear of "the other guy" last.

See

MAGA and love gun ownership. Or kill the constitution with hillary. You're a part of the problem if you don't vote.

>make everything a scantily clad girl, because anime bro hue hue

fucking degenerates

Fucking
This

And that's your right.

Just don't complain about what the next president does.

There's no doubt in my mind Trump will be better on the Second Amendment, but I can see him selling out in a second if the wind shifts. Congress is our best chance. That's why it's so important for Republicans to turn out in November even if they hate Trump for the down ticket candidates.

Cry me a river homo

>implying trump isn't going to make anime real
get a load of this faggot

honestly I don't care what he does in office as long as he gives us 1-3 new traditionalist supreme court justices. the worst thing that could befall this nation in decades is a hillary presidency and it would taint constitutional interpretation for decades to come. I'd take "may fuck the economy due to "volatility" and be a big meanie" over a saul alinsky trained globalist who destabilized the whole middle east at the behest of her banking masters and sells weapons to dictators as long as they donate to the clinton foundation and give bill million dollar speaking fees. She even stole the fucking whitehouse china and trashed the place during Bills inauspicious end of office.

And remember, a Trump presidency means legal post '86 machine guns. Hollis v commies will come down the pipe and be decided by the new appointee.

>/k/ riles itself up arguing about whether we should have no gun laws or only the bare minimum of gun laws
These threads are such circle jerks of defeatism and vaguely gun related conservative rants.

I still find it hard to understand why he quit

Don't you have some dicks to suck?

What is your solution friend?

>I guess Gary J is a gungrabber like all the rest.
Didn't he come out in support of an AWB last week?

Nobody voting for you will do that.

If you're voting for Trump because your convictions say that he'll be the best president then do it. But if you vote for Trump because you're scared of Hillary then you're a bigger coward than jobless, coffee shop liberals who don't vote at all and I hope you enjoy getting bullied by CNBC, Breitbart and Fox News.

Isn't this against the sticky?

To make a board dedicated to political discussion, because everyone has strong views on political issues, so political discussion inevitably destroys otherwise good threads.

>“If it is a constitutional right, then it–like every constitutional right–is subject to reasonable regulation.”
>regulation for free speech
>regulation for freedom of religion
>regulation regulation regulation regulation regulation regulation regulation regulation
>fuck the constitution

Johnson's VP pick is pro-gun control. Johnson is not.

So don't vote or vote for Johnson/Stein/Mike Tyson because "muh feels" and lose the election, and the few remaining gun rights we have, to Clinton. Sounds great

You can bitch and moan about your convictions and rights all you want. But if we dont get conservative judges into office, we wont have any rights left to defend.

Not him, but it's a vote of the best of the worst. Voting for a candidate that isn't Hillary or Trump is throwing your vote away.