Bill Clinton carried out genocide of 1.5 million Iraqis. Why do liberals love him?

Bill Clinton carried out genocide of 1.5 million Iraqis. Why do liberals love him?

Other urls found in this thread:

youtube.com/watch?v=omnskeu-puE
twitter.com/SFWRedditImages

>caring about iraqis

Shoulda genocided more desu

But now they're angry at us whiteys when we could've just let them kill eachother like they normally do.

Because (((((((Maedeline Albright))))))) said it was ok

youtube.com/watch?v=omnskeu-puE

Because he has a D by his name instead of a R. Most Americans are stupid when it comes politics, or anything that matters.

that is why the US allows isis to live: so that the iraqis can get mad and start killing each other again.

but really I think it is a good thing that iraq is facing an existential crisis for, hopefully they will become more united under a banner of some nationalistic ideology, and thus bring peace to the middle east.

>they will become more united under a banner of some nationalistic ideology,

You mean like it was under Nasser and Saddam?

When Gaza City was governed by Nasser, there were no Islamists in the city. When Israel took over in 1967, first thing they did was double the number of mosques, then they started flooding it with Islamists. British Intelligence trained the Muslim Brotherhood to try to assassinate Nasser, today American money is funding Jabhat al-Nusra.

Americans hate secular nationalism in the middle east, they want islamism to take root cause they know it is destructive.

>1967

dude that was during the cold war, and spreading radical islam probably was the US policy, but I doubt it is necessarily the case today.

on Saddam: I think the US is thinking about the long run, saddam was rather unruly and a destabilizing factor in the middle east and thus he had to go. I think if saddam was still around, iran would have never have had agreed to the nuclear deal, even with all the faults it is said to have.

...

i dont. not to fond of his wife, either.

Rape: A Clinton Family Tradition

Because they only "listen and believe" when they want to.

LIBERAL LOGIC

LIBERALS ARE FUCKING RETARDS

AND ONLY GIVE A SHIT ABOUT THEIR PERVERTED AGENDAS

AND HOW TO LIE, SHILL AND PROTEST TILL THEY GET THEM

>confirming your own bias
It wouldn't even matter if they raped somebody.

Former democrat and I loathe the bastard

say what you will about his sexual preferences, but he was one hell of a president.

word of advice, though, if you bring up his sexual assaults and hillary's character assassinations it'll raise doubts in the minds and hearts of the comfortable ladies of a certain age who are otherwise inclined to support hillary this season.

Because he's slick as hell

They don't. Democrats love him. There's a difference.

I don't care about Iraqis, think about Serbian-bros.

Because he served the jews, gave heavy support to Israel, thus he receives good reputation in return for the left.

Anyway, keep ranting about Vince Foster or Islam or whatever, I'm about done telling you basement-dwelling fucks how to be effective.

Because nobody gives a fuck about Brown people when they are in their own country

This. The fact that he left so many Iraqi survivors is the real tragedy.

>Let Bill take credit for the tech bubble

Because the left can only survive on narritive and not facts

Liberals like Bill Clinton for the same reason they liked Ted Kennedy, he's a confirmed serial rapist.

I dought that the tech bubble would raise the median income, maybe the mean yes but not the median for the tech industry is not that big.

also the people that work in tech are already on the half of the population so an increase in their income would not raise the median, unless people are joining the industry from the lower echelons of society, but again the tech industry is not that big so I doubt that that fact alone would contribute to such an increase in median income.

They are monsters