What does Sup Forums think of Los Angeles, North America's third-largest urban area with around 17 million people...

What does Sup Forums think of Los Angeles, North America's third-largest urban area with around 17 million people? It is also Mexico's fourth-largest urban area, between Monterrey and Puebla, going by the number of Mexican nationals and their kids.

Other urls found in this thread:

youtube.com/watch?v=OpA3ORYlgGs
youtube.com/watch?v=uCEeAn6_QJo&ab_channel=areneros
twitter.com/AnonBabble

Never been, but it looks comfy from above desu

youtube.com/watch?v=OpA3ORYlgGs

I would never go there
It looks like a strange place

...

...

...

Anyone going to this? Also, can I sneak in past the gate?

...

not bad tbqh

better than bay area

...

>tfw Lisbon's population is only 500k

My city is 200k . Honestly better than overpopulation but also better than having nothing around you

Don't ever go to LA it is a fucking shithole

Miami is best hispanic/latino city world.

LA isn't really a hispanic city. It's more multicultural.

Área Metropolitana de Lisboa is almost 3 million, though. The city of Los Angeles is only 4 million, but the entire urban area is bigger. The LA region has a LOT of sprawl.

>LA isn't really a hispanic city.
It has a Spanish name and is populated by mostly hispanic and latinos.

With that said; Miami is cleaner, has better beaches and less traffic.

Yeah but Miami is basically 100% Latino and has latinos from everywhere whereas Los Angeles is Mexicans/Persians/Armenians/Asians/WhiteMidwesterners/Jews and then everything else scattered around.

>Los Angeles is Mexicans/Persians/Armenians/Asians/WhiteMidwesterners/Jews and then everything else scattered around.
Maybe thats what makes it such shit.

Miami > LA

make no mistake, the overabundance of Mexicans is what made L.A. shit.

other way around bud. Not sure how people tolerate that dry, smoggy city unless they have beachfront property. And San Diego is clearly superior

I wish I grew up in one of those american houses in a cul-de-sac, playing with the neighbours' kids everyday and bicycling around the suburb.

Bay Area sucks now because all the shit people from Socal moved up here and all the chill Bay Area fags moved down south

The whole states lost its chill. The only place I remember in SoCal that's like the old days is Idyllwild but that's only because that's where all the hippies went to retire.

needs to be sunk into the ocean

I know I'd be better living in LA than in Brazil, but I really don't like this american "retangular urbanistic style"- so to say. Really loks weird.

The pic shows how my ideal city would look like.

There are a lot of shit SoCal people in Berkeley, maybe you're on to something.
I hate the word chill because of SoCal people. "Yah that's chell" in valley girl accent.

The good parts of California are in the Sierra Nevadas and north coast. I hate that if I leave here people will hate me for being Californian and ruining their state.

would be fun to just light up a joint while cruising down one of those streets

youtube.com/watch?v=uCEeAn6_QJo&ab_channel=areneros

America is in a state of prolonged decadence. There are two options

1 - we grasp to maintain our material comfort, slowing our fall so that the transformation into Brazil 2.0 is less painful
2 - we crash hard, and we bring the rest of the planet with us

There are no other options

I live in Los Angeles County.

If you live close to your job and were able to buy a house when they were cheaper or live in a rent controlled apartment, then life is very good. The weather is awesome and the cosmopolitan nature of the area means there's a ton of shit to do.

If however, you are spending 4 hours in your car every day commuting, then your life probably sucks.