Neo-paganism

I just can't wrap my head around how people can CHOOSE to adopt a new religion purely for pragmatic cultural reasons and not because they actually believe in it. Its like pretending to believe in something you don't. I don't get it.
Its extremely autistic. I don't get it.

Other urls found in this thread:

youtube.com/watch?v=dbvp8wXPYYo
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Clemens_von_Galen
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jurgen_Stroop
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Catholic_resistance_to_Nazi_Germany
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Society_of_Jesus#Jesuits_rescue_efforts_during_the_Holocaust
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mit_brennender_Sorge
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Religion_in_Nazi_Germany#National_Socialist_attitudes_towards_Christianity
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Identifying_reliable_sources#Questionable_and_self-published_sources
youtube.com/watch?v=KCwG13K7TAo
youtube.com/watch?v=MV1sVDU9E2E
youtube.com/watch?v=Sz42hBg4jys
youtube.com/watch?v=vat2wprB-0U
nobeliefs.com/HitlerSources.htm
twitter.com/NSFWRedditVideo

Well it is strictly for cultural reasons, like, people wouldn't be christian if it didn't have it's pagan cultural roots (holidays, architecture etc)
Or would really someone worship jewish mythology centered around a shitskin communist hammered on a cross?

...

christians on Sup Forums do this too though. no one here actually believes except the more insane people.

it's literally conservative social signalling

>Its extremely autistic. I don't get it.

Autism is meme fuel.

(1/4)
youtube.com/watch?v=dbvp8wXPYYo
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Clemens_von_Galen
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jurgen_Stroop
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Catholic_resistance_to_Nazi_Germany

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Society_of_Jesus#Jesuits_rescue_efforts_during_the_Holocaust
>The Nazi regime considered the Jesuits one of their most dangerous enemies. According to John Pollard, the Jesuit's "ethos represented the most intransigent opposition to the philosophy of Nazism." A Jesuit college in the city of Innsbruck served as a center for anti-Nazi resistance and was closed down by the Nazis in 1938.[73] Jesuits were a target for Gestapo prosecution and many Jesuit priests were deported to concentration camps

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mit_brennender_Sorge
>Written in German, not the usual Latin, it was smuggled into Germany for fear of censorship and was read from the pulpits of all German Catholic churches on one of the Church's busiest Sundays, Palm Sunday
>It condemned breaches of the Reichskonkordat agreement signed between the German Reich and the Holy See in 1933
>It criticised essentially those parts of Nazism that contradicted Catholicism, and condemned pantheistic confusion, neopaganism, "the so-called myth of race and blood", and statolatry i.e idolatry of the State
>It contained a vigorous defence of the Old Testament out of belief that it prepared the way for the New[4] and, in the opinion of some, contained a veiled attack on Adolf Hitler
>Thus the encyclical was primarily concerned to confront the Nazis anti-Catholic propaganda:
>to defend the Church in the face of totalitarian dictatorship
>Pacelli wrote to Cardinal Faulhaber on April 2, 1937 explaining that the encyclical was theologically and pastorally necessary �to preserve the true faith in Germany.�
>The encyclical also defended baptized Jews, considered still Jews by the Nazis because of racial theories that the Church could not accept.

(2/4)
>Nazi response[edit]

>The (censored) German newspapers made no mention of the encyclical.
>The Gestapo visited the offices of every German diocese the next day and seized all the copies they could find.[18]
>Every publishing company that had printed it was closed and sealed,
>diocesan newspapers were proscribed,
>and limits imposed on the paper available for Church purposes.[19][20]
>Frank J. Coppa asserts that the encyclical was viewed by the Nazis as "a call to battle against the Reich" and that Hitler was furious and "vowed revenge against the Church".[15]
>Thomas Bokenkotter writes that "the Nazis were infuriated, and in retaliation closed and sealed all the presses that had printed it and took numerous vindictive measures against the Church, including staging a long series of immorality trials of the Catholic clergy."[6][21]
>According to John Vidmar, Nazi reprisals against the Church in Germany followed thereafter, including "staged prosecutions of monks for homosexuality, with the maximum of publicity".[22] One hundred and seventy Franciscans were arrested in Koblenz and tried for �corrupting youth� in a secret trial, with numerous allegations of priestly debauchery appearing in the Nazi-controlled press, while a film produced for the Hitler Youth showed men dressed as priests dancing in a brothel.[23]

(3/4)
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Religion_in_Nazi_Germany#National_Socialist_attitudes_towards_Christianity
> the long term aim of Hitler was the "total elimination of Catholicism and of the Christian religion", but that given the prominence of Christianity in Germany, this was necessarily a long term goal.[54]

>Bullock wrote that Hitler had some regard for the organisational power of Catholicism,
>but utter contempt for its central teachings,
>which he said, if taken to their conclusion, "would mean the systematic cultivation of the human failure".[52]
>Many Nazis were anti-clerical in both private and public life.[127]
>The Nazi party had decidedly pagan elements.[128]
>One position is that the Church and fascism could never have a lasting connection because both are a "holistic Weltanschauung" claiming the whole of the person.[126]
>Adolf Hitler himself has been described as a "spiritualist" by Laqueur; but by Bullock as a "rationalist" and "materialist" with no appreciation of the spiritual side of humanity;[129]
>and a simple "atheist" by Blainey.[130]
>His Fascist comrade Benito Mussolini was an atheist.
>Both were anticlerical, but understood that it would be rash to begin their Kulturkampfs against Catholicism prematurely.
>Such a clash, possibly inevitable in the future, was put off while they dealt with other enemies.[131]

>Reply to Thread No.76753188
(4/4)
>b-b-but muh mein kemph

>Self-published sources (online and paper)

>Anyone can create a personal web page or publish their own book, and also claim to be an expert in a certain field. For that reason self-published media�whether books, newsletters, personal websites, open wikis, blogs, personal pages on social networking sites, Internet forum postings, or tweets�are largely not acceptable. This includes any website whose content is largely user-generated, including the Internet Movie Database (IMDB), CBDB.com, content farms, collaboratively created websites such as wikis, and so forth, with the exception of material on such sites that is labeled as originating from credentialed members of the sites' editorial staff, rather than users.
>"Blogs" in this context refers to personal and group blogs. Some news outlets host interactive columns they call blogs, and these may be acceptable as sources so long as the writers are professional journalists or are professionals in the field on which they write and the blog is subject to the news outlet's full editorial control. Posts left by readers may never be used as sources; see WP:NEWSBLOG.
>Self-published material may sometimes be acceptable when its author is an established expert whose work in the relevant field has been published by reliable third-party publications. Self-published information should never be used as a source about a living person, even if the author is a well-known professional researcher or writer; see WP:BLP#Reliable sources.
>Self-published and questionable sources as sources on themselves


>en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Identifying_reliable_sources#Questionable_and_self-published_sources

Speak for yourself Ahmed. Christian generals got me thinking about God again and I went to Church 3 sundays ago for the first time in a while.

>what is all religion, the thread

if everyone actually believed in god, even the ones who claim to currently, the world would be a much different place

Read Rosenberg.
The Myth of the Blood is very real.

Take a look at what he has to say himself, More on the myth that National Socialism was anti-religion, anti-spirituality:

>Christianity is the basis of the entire morality of Germany
youtube.com/watch?v=KCwG13K7TAo
>Hitler will never forsake God
youtube.com/watch?v=MV1sVDU9E2E
>Hitler defending Christianity
youtube.com/watch?v=Sz42hBg4jys
>Christianity and religion in Hitler's Germany
youtube.com/watch?v=vat2wprB-0U
>How Hitler became an islamic pagan occultist atheist christ-killing kike
nobeliefs.com/HitlerSources.htm
View SameGoogleiqdbSauceNAO 1440447709706.jpg, 41KiB, 600x314

Also, more on the Table Talks nobeliefs.com/HitlerSources.htm

>Its like pretending to believe in something you don't.

>implying I dont actually believe in the Aryan gods

fucking really....

Stop replying to this shill thread. I am a neo-pagan because I descend from German Royalty and can feel Odin running through my veins. We are not autistic or stupid, far from it. The Jews have tricked you into believing German culture is non-sense and that a Jewish proxy religion (Christianity) is real. The Jews have done horrible things to Germany and have almost destroyed Paganism forever, there are still some Nordic Pagans left like me keeping it alive. The 1/84 German blood in my cries for revenge for what they did to my ancestors.

DUDE

A Fucking Leaf

Dude you are a Nord why are you so cucked

A fucking mongrel.

>people wouldn't be christian if it didn't have it's pagan cultural roots (holidays, architecture etc)
Nah I grew up in a deeply Christian family and there are many Christians who deplore pagan/secular aspects of Christianity. Most people who actually practice Christianity do so because it gives them hope in a fucked up world.

Sup Forums is a christian website and himmler was a paranoid schizophrenic weirdo

STFU weirdo. I am a neo-pagan and think Greek Gods were not white.

why are leafs so autistic

You are autistic because you are greek and greek gods weren't white and fuck yourself the German in me cries for revenge!

>purely for pragmatic cultural reasons
It's not purely for pragmatic reasons though. It's easy to convince yourself of something if you profit from believing it. People do actually believe the religions they convert to, just how they come to believe in it had pragmatic roots. Motivated reasoning is one hell of a drug.

This would be a pretty great place to throw out a dig at whatever ideology I disagree with, but I don't really feel like it right now.

Actually I don't profit from neo-paganism. I could just feel Odin in my veins.

You dont get it because you think "paganism" implies the believing on any form of metaphysical existance, and thats not the case. Paganism focuses on life ON EARTH.

Check out Varg Vikernes channel for more information.

Also, I am sometimes a cultural christian because there is no way I am going to abandon all those heros and art which came out of european christianity. In fact, I often dream with a "paganization" of the church, getting rid of the bible and every form of middle eastern influence, and leaving only platonism and european characteristics.

>1/84 German blood

I am probably more germanic than you mate...You are right anyways, but dont role play.

I'm 100% Germanic, you are a mongrel, please don't roleplay.

You just said you are 1/84 germanic. If that is the case, then I am more germanic than you, that is a fact.

Anyways I still do not roleplay as germanic. I feel identified with the gods of the iberian peninsula.

No I am 1/84 German. I am 100% Germanic