Naive Jazz?

Recently saw a lecture from pianist John Beasley. in the lecture, he got onto the subject of jazz, and its barriers to entry by inexperienced musicians. Specifically he talked about how "even getting a seat at the table" meant one had to take lessons and study music across many different styles for many years.

This got me to thinking about this recurring origin story that happens often in rock and pop music, of we as listeners praising the "naive" musician who "just bought a guitar and started writing". I don't say "naive" as a pejorative, just to mean that it's music that doesn't come from academia (it's a more common term in the visual arts). I really like a lot of these "naive" bands, like Nirvana, Minute Men, Shamir, Toro y Moi, who found a niche and a source of creativity from themselves, without learning the craft-oriented processes normally taught in a formal music education setting.

This led me to wonder:

Are there any Naive Jazz groups that you know of? Groups of people who said "we don't know how to play jazz, but we're just going to do it anyway". I know you could argue that many of the jazz greats of history "just jammed until they could play" but that's not exactly what I mean. I feel like for a music form that's meant to be as creative and boundary breaking as possible, i'm hearing the same rhythms, the same quoted figures in solos, the same everything. I want to hear people who don't even know what a 2-5-1 is play some jazz.

Other urls found in this thread:

youtube.com/watch?time_continue=20&v=D2gySrUgyMc
youtube.com/watch?v=wUBnArR1d4M
youtube.com/watch?v=EVJUJxCQp0I
youtube.com/watch?v=91J23lL2zzw
youtube.com/watch?v=NrS5HwjbsBM
youtube.com/watch?v=hwmRQ0PBtXU
youtube.com/watch?time_continue=62&v=rH2aeRzO9xk
moonmystmusic.bandcamp.com
johninzaneolson.bandcamp.com
twitter.com/NSFWRedditVideo

bumping because of the effort you put into writing this

thank u friend

what makes something jazz? don't you have to know certain things to make something recognizably jazz music?

possibly so. maybe it's too specific a movement to have a naive version. I don't know.

feel its because jazz is more of a consistent form of 'art music' than pop music is
with pop, there's generally no rules as its definition is that of the general populace making it. but jazz requires certain formal qualities to make it 'jazz'

what qualities does a piece have to have for it to be considered jazz?

I guess really when you boil it down, it just comes down to having a head section, then a solo section, on instruments traditionally used for jazz, like trumpets, saxophones and upright basses. I would be inclined to say "swing" is also a key element but there's a huge movement of very straight modern jazz.

really only improvisation i could be wrong but i feel this is the one essential that you need in jazz music
i guess the importance of improvisation kinda indicates why its hard for naive musicians to succeed in jazz as generally you need to either be a highly virtuosic or distinctive musician to be good as an improviser

you're welcome