I listen to audio books at 3x speed without any issues. It's very time-effective...

I listen to audio books at 3x speed without any issues. It's very time-effective. So why is it a problem if I do it with movies?

Who is that, dare I say, semen demon?

>So why is it a problem if I do it with movies?- 0 post shown.

because movies are more visual than auditory

Some gypsy whore

Fucking state of those tittties, wew

don't get your hopes up, that picture is a fluke, she's ugly as sin.

Unless the tits were shooped, I don't care bout the face

allow us to be the judge of that

>not being a face man

kys

Watch with subtitles. I usually do 2x, but I'm not a native English speaker.

Google is saying Caitlan Knapton.

>audio books
Read a book faggot.

>ugly as sin
well OP care to explain yourself?

they look fine

it's the outfit that's atrocious.

what a shame, such a cute faced young girl with those horrible saggy breasts.

in a more advanced, nudist, society this kind of shit would be avoided by natural selection.

Because linear repetitive audio where one man/woman is reading something is much easier to grasp than all the visual and audio information there is in one movie.

If you watched Memento at 3x speed the first time you wouldn't comprehend a single thing.

Imagine if she showed up to a job interview wearing that. I'm the big dicked, 6'4" ruggedly handsome manager. I'd make her get on her knees and finger her ass while she fondles my dick through my tailored pants, then I'd make her lick my fingers clean for a while, then it's THROATFUCKING TIME BABY, ALL THE WAY NO HANDS. Then I'd just make her sit on my dick, I'm talking anal here kids.

cut away the breasts and you're left with something hideous, 6/10 at best.

The tits do count for something though.

No one cares.

>then it's THROATFUCKING TIME BABY, ALL THE WAY NO HANDS.
>Then I'd just make her sit on my dick, I'm talking anal here kids.

>6/10
>hideous

What do you do with all that saved time?