/classical/ general

Rotorooter edition

Press "F" to pay respects

>General Folder #1. Renaissance up to 20th century/modern classical. Also contains a folder of live recordings/recitals by some outstanding performers.
mega.co.nz/#F!mMYGhBgY!Ee_a6DJvLJRGej-9GBqi0A
>General Folder #3. Mostly 20th century/modern with other assorted bits and pieces
mega.co.nz/#F!Y8pXlJ7L!RzSeyGemu6QdvYzlfKs67w
>General Folder #4. Renaissance up to early/mid-20th century. Also contains a folder of Scarlatti sonate and another live recording/recital folder.
mega.co.nz/#F!kMpkFSzL!diCUavpSn9B-pr-MfKnKdA
>General Folder #5. Renaissance up to late 19th century
mega.co.nz/#F!ekBFiCLD!spgz8Ij5G0SRH2JjXpnjLg
>General Folder #6. Very eclectic mix
mega.co.nz/#F!O8pj1ZiL!mAfQOneAAMlDlrgkqvzfEg
>General Folder #7. Too lazy to write up a description for this, but it has a little of everything
mega.nz/#F!pWR0zABY!xCwF1rEfXiyEy5HuhTDP0Q
>General Folder #8. The user who made this loves the yellow piss of DG on his face. Also there's some other stuff in here.
mega.nz/#F!DlRSjQaS!SzxR-CUyK4AYPknI1LYgdg
>Renaissance Folder #1. Mass settings
mega.co.nz/#F!ygImCRjS!1C9L77tCcZGQRF6UVXa-dA
>Renaissance Folder #2. Motets and madrigals (plus Leiden choirbooks)
mega.co.nz/#F!il5yBShJ!WPT0v8GwCAFdOaTYOLDA1g
>Debussy. There is not an accompanying chart, not available on request.
mega.co.nz/#F!DdJWUBBK!BeGdGaiAqdLy9SBZjCHjCw
>Opera Folder. Contains recorded video productions of about 10 well-known operas, with a bias towards late Romantic
mega.co.nz/#F!4EVlnJrB!PRjPFC0vB2UT1vrBHAlHlw
>Random assortment of books on music theory and composition, music history etc.
mega.nz/#F!HsAVXT5C!AoFKwCXr4PJnrNg5KzDJjw

Other urls found in this thread:

youtube.com/watch?v=ApS5yYGovI4
youtube.com/watch?v=FpsibYXqKw4
youtube.com/watch?v=Cegje3tdCyY
youtube.com/watch?v=WGg9cE-ceso
youtube.com/watch?v=yi4Vpp_CLyY
youtube.com/watch?v=fIvDLe5Tf-E
youtube.com/watch?v=71cTeCSN1-c
youtube.com/watch?v=2vOFFR11RQ8
youtube.com/watch?v=kiVbMB6iLPc&t=3s
youtube.com/watch?v=W3hrXBvRass
youtube.com/watch?v=oBXBUjaC8xk
youtube.com/watch?v=V280ixNS5Jc
youtube.com/watch?v=oC7t35Jv9uI
newrepublic.com/article/139816/breaking-elgars-enigma
twitter.com/NSFWRedditGif

youtube.com/watch?v=ApS5yYGovI4

youtube.com/watch?v=FpsibYXqKw4

youtube.com/watch?v=Cegje3tdCyY

no ur not i am
youtube.com/watch?v=WGg9cE-ceso

youtube.com/watch?v=yi4Vpp_CLyY
youtube.com/watch?v=fIvDLe5Tf-E
youtube.com/watch?v=71cTeCSN1-c
youtube.com/watch?v=2vOFFR11RQ8
wrong

no ur wrong, i'm right
youtube.com/watch?v=kiVbMB6iLPc&t=3s

*teleports behind you*
youtube.com/watch?v=W3hrXBvRass

I say, instead of Harriett Tubgirl.com, we should put Beethoven on all of the bills, problem solved. Or maybe half Trump, half Beethoven. It would be good.

> Brainthovenlets support Trump

...

>putting some krautfuck on American money
No, it should be John Adams or Ives.

salty anglo
salty jew and/or non-white
salty neurotypical

h8rs gon h8

I can agree to Ives but Adams is a fucking popist. Not important in the least. The only other reasonable candidates are Gershwin or Copland

but they are Jews ;^)

putting jews on money is an old anti-semitic canard and will not be tolerated

is it possible to become a decent composer while being self thought (by which i mean studying composition and theory textbooks on my own, and not just dicking around on an instrument)?

you're all wrong. no classical composer can be on a bill for the u.s., because as the great french thinker once said, no high art can come from a land of proles. Townes van Zandt would make an infinite amount more sense than any composer. And Gershwin and Copland both suck
no

Charles Ives wrote bad music that was only incidentally found to be tangentially related to developments that took place elsewhere but were uninfluential due to his isolation, and even then his interpretations of those developments were coarse and unartistic, or to put it frankly, quintessentially American. His recognition amounts to nothing more than forced propaganda and revisionism by Americans who desperately covet the garb of relevance but are in reality nothing but a tattered fingerslipper in the grand scheme of history. There are no great American composers.

I sure hope so user, or I'm going to have to kill myself.

Psst... Hey... /classical/...

This... This is Beethoven, the Ghost Version...

I'm completing my 10th symphony, and I'd like some advice from you posters. I see you have a lot of insight to contribute. What would you give me in the way of guidance?

why not, is guidance that important? What is something a textbook can't teach me

Your fugues are the worst part of your oeuvre. Just stick to your advanced classicism. You do it best.

Experiential knowledge of the sonic realm

There were none. Until I came along ;)

Yoh can be taught to write like someone else. But to be an original voice or creative it has to be there fundamentally and you build upon it. Its ine of those if it isnt there it never will be.

Psst... Hey... /classical/...

This... This is Beet-... uh... B-Bartok, the Ghost Version...

I'm completing my 7th string quartet, lol, and I'd like some advice from you posters. I see you have a lot of insight to contribute. What would you give me in the way of guidance?

I said I can agree to Ives being put on the money however we're in full agreement. America has been somewhat remarkably irrelevant in the classical music scene. Even shitty little developing eastern European states like Czechoslovakia have put out more interesting composers.

>Bartok
fuck off, pedo

You can still kill yourself anyways.

They're actually separate nations, young man

People get degrees in composition from top conservatories and go on to not create a single thing worth writing about. I think some people just have it and some people don't, although not getting a formal education will probably stack the odds significantly against you and force you to work twice as hard. I don't think composition, being more grounded in creation and ingenuity, is as stringent as performance where self teaching will never put you on the same level as a professional. Read Widor's orchestration manual. Study fucking everything that anyone ever composed and steal as much as you can while still thinking about the material in an original fashion. Good luck but don't expect much.

I think creativity is entirely separate from musicality. For instance what makes someone like Satie or even Beethoven (who was of course far more musically gifted) stand out is an imaginative essence that just as easily could have been realized in writing or visual art.

not the whole time going all the way back to Zelenka

My advice for aspiring "artists" is to get a real job and do it on the side. That way you don't put all your eggs in one basket and end up a resentful basketcase with 0 creative output and all of these people (mostly yourself) expecting work from you. I knew one such case, and he ended up being a sound engineer, and he is a suicidal severe alcoholic.

Beethoven was still creative and came up with new ideas. While I agree creativity isnt the whole thing you need some to have your own voice and stand out. And again if its not there it never will be. Some people are born to compose, some are born to perform, some or born to be football players and so on. But ultimately is it isn't fundamentally there to be built upon you'll never be anything more than in someone else's shadow

Artistry involves 0 technicality. The people who play scales all day are essentially prostitutes for the composer's whimsy. They are not artists, and the more technical virtuosity they attain, the less artistry they retain (if it was ever there in the first place) - they squelch the semen from the egg and the conception never begins, and they end up on skid row playing wedding for peanuts and handies from fat Mexicans.

While you did put it a but harshly I kind of agree. I look at players as a means to an end not much more. To satisfy something I can't do myself.

I have a real job. That might be part of the problem. I need to offset the tedium of my day to day life with some spiritual growth.

delusional

new lows even for /classical/

projection much ay? Accept your reality test user. I provided it for you for free. And nice double posting I see there
Spend your real job dreaming of your next masterpiece bitch

well to be clear this is a hobby but I don't want to be writing absolute shit all the time. Right now I am writing twelve tone beats. Lord help me

>projecting
you seem to have a good grasp on that yourself.

what's a reality test?

How's this a new low. I am not the one who said its postitution but lost of great composers were fucked up or perverts. I see nothing wrong with being sexist. How does that make me any worse than the geniuses who were fucked up. Not to say I'm as good or a genius, but how would my fucked up things make me on a base level any worse than anyone else. Like I like 17-18 year old women. So. I'm 23

i agree user great music will always be great music even if it is riddled with wrong notes, terrible phrasing, complete and utter lack of intonation, disconnection between the musicians, etc. performers fucking suck who do they think they are for just playing back a couple notes? totally braindead shit! a computer could do it!

youtube.com/watch?v=oBXBUjaC8xk

what the fuck is this post? if you're that guy a couple threads back that was talking about composing something because your underage girlfriend broke up with you you should just kill yourself already.

>i agree user great music will always be great music even if it is riddled with wrong notes, terrible phrasing, complete and utter lack of intonation, disconnection between the musicians, etc. performers fucking suck who do they think they are for just playing back a couple notes? totally braindead shit! a computer could do it!
t. shitty "performer" prostitute lol

Hey I still see nothing wrong with it and I got b& for that. But still. Real talk, my point was hows his a new low for classical music?

lol he actually took the type to screencap, imgur, crop, save image, and upload. wow that's pathetic lol

We get it. Your 17 yr. old gf broke up with you. We get it.

t. not good at anything and envious of anyone that is to the point where you try to do mental gymnastics to find ways to justify your pitiful existence

twelve tone beats lol NIGGER ALARM... NIGGER ALARM... LOL

Actually I'm a world class troll and my name is Weev.

These are all the same person.

I wont bring it up again. I guess my point was this
>hows that a new low for classical
Like werent there other composers who liked younger women?

You're right user, they really are

>51 replies
>8 posters
Hmmmm.....

That's what happens when you can't into development. No bully pls ;______________;

Okay but "some Hungarian guy a century ago was a pedo so I can be too" is a really poor justification of your problem.

I guess thats a fair point. But its just like I dont know. I'm not gonna have a therapy session on /classical/ ill probably be banned again but I guess its more of an at least I'm not the only one type thing vs just pure justification

>55 / 10 / 8 / 4

holy shit lol !

tchaikovsky 4th symphony finale
debussy- la mer - not much crash but one of the most intricate sus cymbal pieces in the repertoire
tchaikovsky - romeo and juliet overture
rossini - william tell overture
korsakov - cappriccio edpagnol / scheherazade
dvorak - carnival overture
berlioz - roman carnival overture

If I write a symphony and it gets put in a library am I allowed to walk in and tear it to pieces if I want?

10 posters!

youtube.com/watch?v=V280ixNS5Jc

>10 posters

what about it?

>Nothing matters *burp* morty! I'm composer Rick!

>Rick and Morty

>>>/reddit/

That's my point. If everyone let this kind of nihilistic bullshit attitude deter them then nothing would get done.

I'm the lad from last thread that wanted to get into classical music
You boys told me to start with Bach, so I'm working my way through the entire BWV
What have I done? Has anyone ever listening to the whole thing? Am I hitting levels of euphoria/autism that shouldn't be possible in this realm?

you got meme'd kid

this thread is so bad holy shit

In what way? Do you just go to random threads and post banal observations that might be relevant?

to be fair this thread is full of bait and unironic pedophilia

no one told me to listen to the BWV. They just said to listen to the major pieces of Bach and then work my way forward.
The only thing I can compare this to is Literature, and I know that if you just read Dante's Inferno, Moby Dick and Brave New World, you're really not going to understand the western canon.
I would assume it's the same as Classical. You're not going to fully appreciate and understand it from listening to Fur Elise and Canon in D.

yes but listening to Bach without any prior understanding of music is like reading Shakespeare in Old German but more dangerous since, because it's music, you might not realize that you don't understand it.

Start with the Romantics: Tchaikovsky, Brahms, and then Beethoven. Afterwards slowly explore either direction: listen to Rachmaninoff, Faure, and Mozart. Dabble in Bach occasionally to keep your tongue wet but always hold back until you're ready, and give him no more attention than you would Lully, Locatelli, Vivaldi, Handel, and others.

Tchaikovsky is honestly trash anyways

Good taste in spiritual teachers my man

>is it possible to become a decent composer while being self thought
>thought

nope. Thinking about the self will only get you so far.
Seriously though, you can become decent, but studying composition at university will make you decent faster and with more background information.
The university environment also gives you opportunities to have pieces played by real people, to meet and form working relationships with performers, meet other composers, potentially meet and learn from incredibly inspirational lecturers, often established composers themselves.

Its like learning a language - you can learn the basics from a book, but you will never become fluent without exposure to and immersion in the real thing.

>What is something a textbook can't teach me
A textbook can't go over your score with you and show you what could be done better or which parts aren't as effective or aren't idiomatic for the instruments. This for me was the most helpful part of university - being able to go to my composition professor and go through my scores with him outside of class time 1 on 1. I learned a lot from doing this as often as possible. As the prof was an established composer with experience in many classical genres, he always had some great input and advice. After 4 years of this I was able to do this process on my own, using my own experience of rehearsals and performances and my knowledge of orchestration.

Why do you always do this Poly? How many people who ask this question are really going to have the money and time to study at uni?

>How many people who ask this question are really going to have the money and time to study at uni?
Eh where I live its easy to go to uni. We have student loans so you can study as much as you like then just pay it back (or not - some people never do...). Hell back in the 80s University was free here.

I give this advice because imo a formal education and at least some experience with real performers is the only way to truly become a composer. If people seriously want to be a composer, its a must.

I see. I'll take this on board
Is there any reading which you would suggest for gaining an understanding of classical music? I have played piano since I was a child, so I'm not a total beginner and can appreciate most of the theory and technique simply from first hand experience.

>twelve tone beats

I have to admit that sounds horrible but still can you post one? I'm curious

America always wanted to distance itself from Europe and stand out through greatness, hence classical not being the main american musical academia focus. Though, based on Dvorak's observations, they kinda reached it through jazz, mostly due to the incorporation of African rhythmical work and European melodic and harmonic work. Hell, a walking bassline technically falls under counterpoint.

jazz aint shit nigga

I'm not saying I like it, but America has many reasons for not producing great classical composers - its brand of nationalism incorporated a folk element present nowhere else in Europe, the use of "groove" and repetitions in the vein of West African folk music, which is kind of really fucking difficult to implement in an orchestral style, so it became something else entirely.

Oh, right, this is Sup Forums.
>t. adorno

I think it has more to do with the fact that the eternal anglo sucks at making music. Britain also has a shit-tier line-up. Holst? Get the fuck out of here.

Yeah, clearly it is Anglos failing miserably at classical. Though you could argue Minimalism is quintessentially American classical but that's also based on the fusion of european melodic and harmonic work and west african and european folk rhythmic work.

>Britain also has a shit-tier line-up
Renaissance though. You know, before the U.S. even existed?
Tallis, Fayrfax, Byrd, Taverner, Gibbons and those guys.
They have some great composers in other periods too - Purcell, Delius, Britten, Ferneyhough, RVW, Holst, PMD, Harrison Birtwistle, Finzi, Tavener, Finnissy.

>Minimalism is quintessentially American classical
yeah it sums up the trash side of US composers.
"Lets get high and write some tonal music that repeats a lot. Hey if we add some subtle changes maybe people won't walk out!"

they can have minimalism. Its the worst movement. The only other thing they managed to champion was bullshit extended techniques like turning the innards of a piano into a hardware salad.

youtube.com/watch?v=oC7t35Jv9uI

Britbong detected

post DEEPEST lore
newrepublic.com/article/139816/breaking-elgars-enigma

...

recommend me something like the mozart's piano concerto 20

Mozart's piano concerto 21

Nope. not British. I just like renaissance and 20th century music.

Is that you Reich?

Mozart's piano concerto 22

Mozart's piano concerto 19+1

kill yourself

Piano Concerto 23 (the 3rd movement is really good. Probably my favorite from Mozart).

Mozart's concerto for piano and orchestra in C minor desu

Haydn piano concerto 11

Who is the best composer of the 20th century and why is it Shostakovich?