If Blacks are not superior and the master race

If Blacks are not superior and the master race
Then how come son of god WAS BLACK?
Black pride :1
White cucks crackers: 0

Fictional character.

Fuck you
Who denies the Messiah and his coming shall burn in the hell

Don't you EVER talk to God or God's step-son again!

Fictional locale.

Dont talk to my god or my gods son ever again!

When was his hair described like wool?

His eyes were also like "blazing fire", his feet "like bronze glowing in a furnace, and his voice was like the sound of rushing waters", "and coming out of his mouth was a sharp, double-edged sword". Yeah, a typical negro for you.

Jesus was invented by a mulatto called Titus Flavius, specifically to pacify radical messianic Judaism.

He never existed.

Nothing to see here.

>Jesus was invented by a mulatto called Titus Flavius, specifically to pacify radical messianic Judaism.
>buying into kike propaganda of roman sponsored christianity
Jesus was made up by rabbi Paul as a mouthpiece of his greek-inspired branch of judaism.

Wool is soft, nigger hair is hard and dry like pubic hair.

عند المصريين اعتقد ان يسوع الأسود

Those are metaphors fool, and they describe how great rapper Jesus was:

>voice like rushing water
He had flow better than Big L
>coming out of his mouth was a sharp, double-edged sword
In other words his lyrics were dope af, nigga was spittin fire yo
Jesus confirmed for strong black man

He was a jew, you retarded faggot.

He was a real person whether you are religious or not. Even historians acknowledge him.

Bronze skin is tanned white people skin

Coal black or poo brown are not bronze.

And wool is not wire. Modern wool also is spun in ways that weren't invented then so the texture/look is not comparable.

if it even does say that, it would have been a refrence to the light colour and softness of the sheep it came from. There's nothing soft about negro hair.

According to BLM everyone was black, you can be sure that if we find some alien remains they'll be claiming those were black as well.

Please lead me to these historians

>was white like wool
>was white like
>was white

was wool?

Most of accademia agrees with some kind of historical jesus being a thing. "Some kind" is a key word here as most historians also agree that gospel account is mostly bullshit.
But there are still some proponents of the mythic theory and they do have some pretty valid points, especialy concerning writtings of Paul.

I thought that too. Read Cesar's Messiah and it'll become a lot.more clear.

Bronze, not brown
He was Middle Eastern
Also

There's 1, Josephus who was sponsored by the Flavius dynasty. Without that pillowbiter Christ fags have nothing.